Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Psychology Forum  »  John O'Keefe's theories on Language & The Cognitive Map
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Daniel Kelly (AKA Jack)
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 7:41 am
Guest
Hello,

Are you aware of John O'Keefe's theories of language (e.g. O'Keefe '96 &
O'Keefe '01), in which he extends his Cognitive Map theories (O'Keefe &
Nadel 1978) to human behaviour? If so, please let me know what you think of
them... for example: do you agree with O'Keefe that prepositions can be
thought of as defining the activity of boundary vector cells? Do you agree
that language requires an intrinsically spatial deep structure? And did
language really evolve for the purpose of communicating spatial knowledge
(e.g. the food is over there, the enemies are behind us). Why aren't
linguists catching on to John O'Keefe's ideas?

Thanks,
Jack

References:

O'Keefe & Nadel (1978) "The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map" Clarendon Press,
Oxford. Now available online at www.cognitivemap.net

O'Keefe (1996) "The Spatial prepositions in English, vector grammar and the
Cognitive Map theory" a chapter in "Language and Space" (edited by P. Bloom,
M. Peterson, L. Nadel, M. Garrett) MIT Press, Mass. pp493-529

O'Keefe (2001) "Vector Grammer, Places, and the Functional Role of the
Spatial Prepositions in English", a chapter in "Axes and Vectors in Language
and Space", edited by E. Van der Zee & J. Slack, OUP
Critter
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:11 am
Guest
O-H M-Y G-O-D.

O'Keefe is a total and complete QUACK, a Kwax Kwak.





"Daniel Kelly (AKA Jack)" <d.kellyNOSPAM@NOSPAM.ucl.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:bpsu80$hk2$1@uns-a.ucl.ac.uk...
Quote:
Hello,

Are you aware of John O'Keefe's theories of language (e.g. O'Keefe '96 &
O'Keefe '01), in which he extends his Cognitive Map theories (O'Keefe &
Nadel 1978) to human behaviour? If so, please let me know what you think
of
them... for example: do you agree with O'Keefe that prepositions can be
thought of as defining the activity of boundary vector cells? Do you
agree
that language requires an intrinsically spatial deep structure? And did
language really evolve for the purpose of communicating spatial knowledge
(e.g. the food is over there, the enemies are behind us). Why aren't
linguists catching on to John O'Keefe's ideas?

Thanks,
Jack

References:

O'Keefe & Nadel (1978) "The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map" Clarendon
Press,
Oxford. Now available online at www.cognitivemap.net

O'Keefe (1996) "The Spatial prepositions in English, vector grammar and
the
Cognitive Map theory" a chapter in "Language and Space" (edited by P.
Bloom,
M. Peterson, L. Nadel, M. Garrett) MIT Press, Mass. pp493-529

O'Keefe (2001) "Vector Grammer, Places, and the Functional Role of the
Spatial Prepositions in English", a chapter in "Axes and Vectors in
Language
and Space", edited by E. Van der Zee & J. Slack, OUP

 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:33 am