Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Astro Forum  »  Weight and detecting change or creation of motion...
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 9:37 am
Guest
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch
...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 12:59 pm
Guest
On May 8, 2:18 pm, "Peter Webb" <webbfam... at (no spam) DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au>
wrote:
Quote:
mitch.nicolas.raem... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message

news:09c6cbaf-e8a8-4f31-bd7b-5bdc581c3a0e at (no spam) u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Hardly. You could be in orbit and use your motor to accelerate away from the
earth, or to declelerate and crash into the earth. In both cases, the same
"weight" would be measured inside the space craft, despite the actual
courses being completely different.

I don't believe that concludes your case. Show the math for that.
I am not talking about the gravitational field. I am speaking of
change of motion gravity alone. It is always detectable.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Quote:


Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Change of motion or acceleration is detectable
Ralph Hertle...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 3:27 pm
Guest
mitch.nicolas.raemsch at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch




Mitch:

That is an example of scientific word salad. What you say means
absolutely nothing.

In classic Post Modernist style you also fail to include precise
definitions at the top of your monolog.

Unless, of course, your goal is to integrate as many fallacies of
logic together in the same sentences as is possible. You writing
includes the fallacies of post hoc ergo propter hoc, non-seqitur,
failure to identify objective facts of existents, context
switching [+/-], unsubstantiated assertions, and meaningless
undefined terms. The grammar is so discontinuous of logical
method that it is difficult to clearly identify the fallacies of
distribution.

Even the one or two things that you have previously written, and
that seem to be true, must be discounted as mere arbitrary
assertions because of your failure to substantiate what you say
with contextual definitions, and with empirically identified facts.

Ralph Hertle

..
Ralph Hertle...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 3:32 pm
Guest
mitch.nicolas.raemsch at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch




Mitch:

That is an example of scientific word salad. What you say means
absolutely nothing.

In classic Post Modernist style you also fail to include precise
definitions at the top of your monolog.

Unless, of course, your goal is to integrate as many fallacies of
logic together in the same sentences as is possible. You writing
includes the fallacies of post hoc ergo propter hoc, non-seqitur,
failure to identify objective facts of existents, context
switching [+/-], unsubstantiated assertions, and meaningless
undefined terms. The grammar is so discontinuous of logical
method that it is difficult to clearly identify the fallacies of
distribution.

Even the one or two things that you have previously written, and
that seem to be true, must be discounted as mere arbitrary
assertions because of your failure to substantiate what you say
with contextual definitions, and with empirically identified facts.

Ralph Hertle

..
Uncle Al...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Guest
mitch.nicolas.raemsch at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Quote:

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch

Hey fucking stooopid:

http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
Dunning-Kruger effect (2000 Ig Nobel Prize): ignorance more
frequently begets confidence than does knowledge

1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.

http://www.meninhats.com/d/20040430.html
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Peter Webb...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 5:18 pm
Guest
<mitch.nicolas.raemsch at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:09c6cbaf-e8a8-4f31-bd7b-5bdc581c3a0e at (no spam) u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.



Hardly. You could be in orbit and use your motor to accelerate away from the
earth, or to declelerate and crash into the earth. In both cases, the same
"weight" would be measured inside the space craft, despite the actual
courses being completely different.


> Mitch Raemsch
...
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 12:53 pm
Guest
On May 8, 2:59 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem... at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On May 8, 2:18 pm, "Peter Webb" <webbfam... at (no spam) DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au
wrote:





mitch.nicolas.raem... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message

news:09c6cbaf-e8a8-4f31-bd7b-5bdc581c3a0e at (no spam) u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Hardly. You could be in orbit and use your motor to accelerate away from the
earth, or to declelerate and crash into the earth. In both cases, the same
"weight" would be measured inside the space craft, despite the actual
courses being completely different.

I don't believe that concludes your case. Show the math for that.
I am not talking about the gravitational field. I am speaking of
change of motion gravity alone. It is always detectable.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008



Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Change of motion or acceleration is detectable- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The creation of new motion is detectable.
Google Is Spam...
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:21 pm
Guest
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0 at (no spam) hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:482368E0.4FDAD864 at (no spam) hate.spam.net...
Quote:
mitch.nicolas.raemsch at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:

1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.

look in the mirror
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:53 am