Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Physics Forum  »  An electron changes a quark
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Guest
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:09 pm
Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Igor
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:46 am
Guest
On Apr 19, 10:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Look up the hypothetical hyperweak interaction. They'll be a test
later, which you are sure to fail, and hopefully be banned from
sci.physics forever.
Guest
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:27 am
On Apr 20, 7:46 am, Igor <thoov...@excite.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 19, 10:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Look up the hypothetical hyperweak interaction.  They'll be a test
later, which you are sure to fail, and hopefully be banned from
sci.physics forever.

There is no weak force. There is radioactive instability in my
opinion. They got it wrong having to call it a force.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
PD
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:26 am
Guest
On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD
Guest
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:24 pm
On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD

The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at
bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what
are shells made of?

Demicritus said atoms are little hard things.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Rock Brentwood
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:00 am
Guest
On Apr 20, 2:27 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
There is no weak force. There is radioactive instability in my
opinion. They got it wrong having to call it a force.

That's precisely what characterizes a non-Abelian gauge force -- the
flavor-changing interactions that underlie radioactive instability.

So, it's a force even by your own account. The electroweak force is
described by a field law comprising a non-linear variant of Maxwell's
equations and the quantized version of the force accords well with
experimental data. This is decades beyond guess work. People are way
past the point of having to guess "oh, I think this is a gauge force",
and are at the point of precisely fitting decay ratios and times
predicted by the quantized theory. GSW would never even had made the
research literature in the first place were it not for this level of
matching with experimental data.
Enes
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:55 am
Guest
On 24 Kwi, 07:24, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:





On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD

The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at
bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what
are shells made of?

Demicritus said atoms are little hard things.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Ukryj cytowany tekst -

- Poka¿ cytowany tekst -



Twice Mitch Raemsch,
you must have to know, that electrons (electropositrons rather) and
nucleons ( so, protons too) are build with the ~sames submassiv
paricles, which have (+) on one side and (-) on another once
( summary ~0).

]ohn from Enes
Enes
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:07 am
Guest
On 25 Kwi, 21:55, Enes <pies_na_teo...@gazeta.pl> wrote:
Quote:
On 24 Kwi, 07:24, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:





On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD

The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at
bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what
are shells made of?

Demicritus said atoms are little hard things.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Ukryj cytowany tekst -

- Poka¿ cytowany tekst -

Twice Mitch Raemsch,
you must have to know, that electrons (electropositrons rather) and
nucleons ( so, protons too) are build with  the ~sames submassiv
paricles, which have (+) on one side and  (-) on another once
( summary ~0).

]ohn from Enes- Ukryj cytowany tekst -

- Pokaż cytowany tekst -


Mitch, what*s about you ?
Yes, it*s new, but easy to understand :)

Let me show you an example:
http://tiny.comm.pl/?0HC
hanson
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:48 pm
Guest
"Enes" <pies_na_teorie@gazeta.pl> wrote to

Twice Mitch Raemsch,
Mitch, what's about you ?
Yes, it's new, but easy to understand Smile
Quote:

Enes wrote

Let me show you, Raemsch, an example:
http://tiny.comm.pl/?0HC
http://www.atto.fysik.lth.se/
Quote:

hanson wrote:

No, Raemsch won't understand. He is a sample of the
latter-day issues of the Einstein Dingleberries... ahaha..
So, never mind Raemsch. Raemsch does not play with
a full deck, nor does he have all the cups in his cupboard
.... but he compulsively pisses into each and every post...
like a filthy little homeless street mutt in his hope to get
noticed.... ahahahaha....
Quote:

Anyways "Enes"... your link http://www.atto.fysik.lth.se/

is quite interesting. But what does that have to do with
"An electron changes a quark"?....
BTW, is that YOUR stuff, YOUR Website?
Which one of these authors are you?
Have you PhD'd by now?
hanson
Enes
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:05 pm
Guest
On 30 Kwi, 23:48, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
Quote:
"Enes" <pies_na_teo...@gazeta.pl> wrote to

mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com
Twice Mitch Raemsch,
Mitch, what's about you ?
Yes, it's new, but easy to understand :)

Enes wrote
Let me show you, Raemsch, an example:http://tiny.comm.pl/?0HChttp://www.atto.fysik.lth.se/

hanson wrote:

No, Raemsch won't understand. He is a sample of the
latter-day issues of the Einstein Dingleberries... ahaha..
So, never mind Raemsch. Raemsch does not play with
a full deck, nor does he have all the cups in his cupboard
... but he compulsively pisses into each and every post...
like a filthy little homeless street mutt in his hope to get
noticed.... ahahahaha....

But he is reformable, rather ( for ex. Androcles no).

He removed his "twice Nobel "

Quote:
Anyways "Enes"... your linkhttp://www.atto.fysik.lth.se/
is quite interesting. But what does that  have to do with
"An electron changes a quark"?....
BTW, is that YOUR stuff, YOUR Website?
Which one of these authors are you?
Have you PhD'd by now?
hanson

It is not my website, but there is experiment good to explain

electropositron hypothesis. They do not know about it and return to
Kepler*s laws to explain.

I,m not PhD, an engineer-constructor and iventor, only.
PD
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:59 am
Guest
On Apr 24, 12:24 am, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD

The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at
bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what
are shells made of?

Atomic shells hold Halley's comet at bay from the sun?

Quote:

Demicritus said atoms are little hard things.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Guest
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:11 am
On May 1, 8:59 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 24, 12:24 am, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:





On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD

The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at
bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what
are shells made of?

Atomic shells hold Halley's comet at bay from the sun?





Demicritus said atoms are little hard things.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Non sequiter
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:32 pm