What are the uses of Einstine Theory?

Main Page | Report this Page

Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » What are the uses of Einstine Theory?

Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next

Author

Message

Sanny

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:09 am

Guest

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

2. Light Speed is Constant always.

Some people have made Light Travel faster than C? is it true?

3.

Just like when in a car we are travelling at X Speed and we throw a
ball inside the car at Y Speed in direction of car. For an outsider
the Speed of Ball will be X+Y.

Say we have a Big Planet Travelling at 0.9c Speed in X Direction
And there is a Accelerator Shooting Helium Atom at 0.9c Speed in X
Direction

Then for an Observer outside the Planet the Speed of Helium would be
0.9c+0.9c = 1.8c

But Einstine says nothing can go at more than c?

Why are so many people saying Einstine theory is wrong?

What does current science tell about his theory?

Why is this theory so confusing? It says a person travelling in a
spacecraft at Light Speed Time will travel Slower in that Craft and
when he returns back to Earth after 1 hour he will see everyone has
grown 50 Years Older?

Are these just Fantasis or they are correct?

Bye
Sanny

Extreme Discussions at: http://www.getclub.com/Discussion.php

kenseto

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:48 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 8:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

They are just fantasies. Read the paper entitled "Improved Relativity
Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity" in my website for better
interpretations of our universe.
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Guest

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:40 am

Let me try to address your comments:

On Apr 28, 8:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

Einstein is the proper spelling.

Quote:

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

Actually, the statement is that light always travels at c through
vacuum. In physical media, the propagation of light is altered by the
response of atoms in the medium to the presence of the electric and
magnetic fields of the light. OR another way to think of it is the
quanta of light (the photon) scattering many times as it goes through
the lens or water. Naively, the photon moves at c whenever it is
freely propagating, but gets bounced around so many times that it
takes longer to get out. It is when you describe light as a classical
wave that you say the phase velocity changes in different media, but
again, what's going on microscopically is the wave is scattering off
of the atoms and the net result of it is to make the wave take longer
to cover the same distance.

Quote:

2. Light Speed is Constant always.

Some people have made Light Travel faster than C? is it true?

There are a couple of experiments you might be talking about here, one
involves sending light into a media with an index of refraction which
is less than one (at that frequency). "It is, however, possible for
the index of refraction of a medium to be less than 1 for certain
frequencies, such as x-rays in glass. This implies that the velocity
of light exceeds c, which may seem to conflict with relativity.
However, the "velocity of light" that appears in the denominator of
the refractive index is actually the phase velocity, rather than the
group velocity, and the latter is typically the speed of energy
transfer and signal propagation. (The phenomenon of "anomalous
dispersion" can actually result in a group velocity greater than c,
but in all cases the signal velocity is less than or equal to c.)"
Quote taken from http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s8-04/8-04.htm because
the writeup there is better than I can give.

The other experiment I am aware of involves the use of frustrated
total internal reflection to get the light to tunnel through a section
of space without actually propagating through it. This is another
weird effect, and can even take place over a meter at the right
frequencies of light. But again, nothing physical is traveling in
that space, so effectively the light jumps from one section of the
apparatus to another such that it's average speed is greater than c,
but at no point during its travel is its instantaneous speed greater
than c.

Quote:

3.

Just like when in a car we are travelling at X Speed and we throw a
ball inside the car at Y Speed in direction of car. For an outsider
the Speed of Ball will be X+Y.

Say we have a Big Planet Travelling at 0.9c Speed in X Direction
And there is a Accelerator Shooting Helium Atom at 0.9c Speed in X
Direction

Then for an Observer outside the Planet the Speed of Helium would be
0.9c+0.9c = 1.8c

But Einstine says nothing can go at more than c?

The addition of velocities rule that you have used there is not the
proper one to use in relativity. It seems to be the most intuitive
one, but the proper velocity addition rule for a Lorentz-covariant
framework is:

(v1+v2)/(1+v1*v2/c^2)

if we add .9c + .9c we get:

1.8c/(1+.81) = .994c

Quote:

Why are so many people saying Einstine theory is wrong?

I honestly don't know why. Special relativity is one of the most
rigorously tested theories we have.

Quote:

What does current science tell about his theory?

Current science is in fantastic agreement with his theory. And not
for lack of trying: disproving SR conclusively in an reproducible
experiment with no other explanation would be the greatest discovery
of whatever age it happened in. The person would be remembered over
Einstein in the way that Einstein is remembered over Galileo. So the
motivation is certainly there to disprove it, but nobody has been able
to. So it seems we're stuck with it.

Also the GPS system has confirmed (and indeed, relies upon to work
properly) GR to amazingly high precision. See
http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/gps-relativity.asp

Particle accelerators also routinely take particles up to 99.999% of
the speed of light, and work exactly as predicted by SR.

So what current science tells us is that any theory that replaces SR/
GR must be nearly identical to it in this wide range of areas we have
explored so far

Quote:

Why is this theory so confusing? It says a person travelling in a
spacecraft at Light Speed Time will travel Slower in that Craft and
when he returns back to Earth after 1 hour he will see everyone has
grown 50 Years Older?

Are these just Fantasis or they are correct?

I can't find a link to info on it at the moment, but the US Air Force
collaborated for a high precision test of time dilation by taking two
of the best cesium clocks, leaving one at an airbase and flying the
other one in an aircraft. The moving clock was found to be behind the
stationary one by a small but measurable amount.

It's a confusing theory because we never travel near the speed of
light, in fact, in our everyday experiences the speed of light is so
large that it may as well be infinity (note that in the limit of an
infinite speed of light, SR reduces mathematically to ordinary
Newtonian mechanics). So we just have no intuition for it, it's
outside of what we experience. But being counterintuitive is
certainly not a very strong argument against it. ;)

QS

BradGuth

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:20 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 5:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Perhaps the best theory of Einstein is the theory of our continually
dumbfounding each and every "no child left behind" policy.

Or how about the theory of always getting the public to fork over
their hard earned loot, so that existing and future Einsteins are
forever funded no matters what the consequences, and of the more off-
world research the better, especially if it's loot well spent on inert
cosmic eye-candy that's light years away, and apparently forever
expanding faster than any form of physical travel could safely muster.

I often wonder, if Einstein had never existed, as to how much better
off humanity and that of our frail environment would have become.
.. - Brad Guth

BradGuth

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:23 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 8:55 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:

Quote:

This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

amusingn...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:ac7c904c-6d02-497a-8858-2a4eaa780b36@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
Let me try to address your comments:

On Apr 28, 8:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

Einstein is the proper spelling.

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

| Actually, the statement is that light always travels at c through
| vacuum.

Actually, the statements are:

"light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which
is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body"
and
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in
the stationary system, with the velocity c-v,"
so you can't even get that right.

He'd missed the one about gravitons creating secondary/recoil
photons.
.. - Brad Guth

Guest

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:44 am

On 28 avr, 08:09, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

Einstein's theory did not predict this. He took c as constant
velocity of light "in vacuum" as one of the postulates on which
he founded his theory on.

Quote:

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

Yes. But this does not depend on Einstein's theory. This is
experimentally observed info.

Quote:

2. Light Speed is Constant always.

In vacuum yes.

Quote:

Some people have made Light Travel faster than C? is it true?

No.

However, Fizeau demonstrated that while travelling though
water, a medium in which light travels at a speed a little
lower than c, if the water is set in motion in the same
direction, then the velocity of the water partly adds to
that of light in static water, and if it is set in motion in
the opposite direction, then the velocity of water partly
subtracts from the speed of light in static water.

But there never were any occurence of velocity of
light faster than c in vacuum.

From Maxwell's theory, it simply is impossible. Light can
travel at no other speed than c in vacuum. Not lower nor
faster.

Quote:

3.

Just like when in a car we are travelling at X Speed and we throw a
ball inside the car at Y Speed in direction of car. For an outsider
the Speed of Ball will be X+Y.

See above. Fizear also did the same experiment with air at
ground level pressure. Inconclusive since the velocity of light in
air
is practically identical to that in vacuum. No instrument can measure
the difference, even interferometers.

Quote:

Say we have a Big Planet Travelling at 0.9c Speed in X Direction
And there is a Accelerator Shooting Helium Atom at 0.9c Speed in X
Direction

Then for an Observer outside the Planet the Speed of Helium would be
0.9c+0.9c = 1.8c

But Einstine says nothing can go at more than c?

Even if Einstein had not said it, it still would be impossible.

The reason is that the mass of bodies increases as velocity
increases. The closer to the speed of light, the more massive
bodies become and the more energy is required to increase
the velocity more.

It would take an infinite amount of energy to get a body
as close as possible to c, but without reaching it even then,
since c is an asymptotic velocity on the velocities curve (an
unreacheable limit).

Quote:

Why are so many people saying Einstine theory is wrong?

You have to be more specific. He was said to be wrong about
what exactly.

Quote:

What does current science tell about his theory?

Some say it is correct. Some say it is not.

Quote:

It always turned out to be fantasy since in reality it is impossible
for us to travel at anywhere near the speed of light.

André Michaud

www.ejdoscher.com

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:45 am

Guest

Re: Sanny's question on Einstein's theory of special relativity:

Traveling in a spaceship at near the speed of light possibly could
slow down clocks and even slow down a human's aging rate. However, if
he left the earth and returned 20 years later everyone on earth would
have aged 20 years, not "thousands of years". Time can not be slowed
down speeded up. I quote from my website, www.ejdoscher.com , first
essay, paragraph 11: "I believe that time did not exist in the
universe until man invented it. Since then its use has steadily
increased, and in the modern world is used extensively and constantly
in innumerable ways; without it the world would be in chaos. One
important use of time is to relate it to events, changes, and all
other activities that have occurred, are occurring, or will occur on
earth or in the universe. However, time doesn't cause changes or
events to occur, they occur independently of time. The relationship
of time to events and changes is coincidental. Time cannot be slowed
down or speeded up. We will never be able to go back in time to the
past or forward in time to the future. Now, the present is the same
all over earth and throughout the universe, but if a star explodes now
we won’t be able to see the explosion until the light from the
explosion reaches us, and that would be years from now. What we see
in outer space now is not there now and what is there now we cannot
see now."

On Apr 28, 8:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

2. Light Speed is Constant always.

Some people have made Light Travel faster than C? is it true?

3. >> Just like when in a car we are travelling at X Speed and we throw a
ball inside the car at Y Speed in direction of car. For an outsider
the Speed of Ball will be X+Y.

Say we have a Big Planet Travelling at 0.9c Speed in X Direction
And there is a Accelerator Shooting Helium Atom at 0.9c Speed in X
Direction

Then for an Observer outside the Planet the Speed of Helium would be
0.9c+0.9c = 1.8c

But Einstine says nothing can go at more than c?

Why are so many people saying Einstine theory is wrong?

What does current science tell about his theory?

Why is this theory so confusing? It says a person travelling in a
spacecraft at Light Speed Time will travel Slower in that Craft and
when he returns back to Earth after 1 hour he will see everyone has
grown 50 Years Older?

Are these just Fantasis or they are correct?

Bye
Sanny

Extreme Discussions at:http://www.getclub.com/Discussion.php

gaby de wilde

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:52 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 2:09 pm, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Why is this theory so confusing?

It's the people arround the theory who confuse things. Most are well
aware of getting tricked into studing nonsense. This doesn't mean they
accept the undenialble fact.

You will be surpriced how the light speed entogiasts refuse to address
the verfy subject.

A long story short:

If you bring up any of the following subject you will find 99% of
mankind is brainwashed into disbelieving.

Aliens
Remote viewing
Historical high tech civilisations.
Zero point energy
Gravity engines
Anti gravity
Bio plasma
Resonance
Time travel
Telekinesis
etc etc

You don't need others to help you find the evidence, just look at your
own response. What is your prefered tactic to figure out the truth
under those topics?

1 - to guess?

or

2 - to investigate?

Now ask yourself: Is it worth bringing up any subject when knowing the
only response you are going to get is of type 1?

It's easy to defraud this. If type 1 conclusions are rational in your
world view then it becomes easy to guess what lack of content your
response will have. It becomes very much worth it not to trigger such
response.The review describes the lack of review and nothing else.

Their thoughts lack so much depth that by bringing up a subject they
instantaneously assume you have subscribed to it as if a divine fact.

When crossing the road I look left and right for traffic. This doesn't
mean I think there is a car. It means I want to know IF THERE IS A
CAR. Surely if I look out when crossing the road I must believe there
is also a car? If I didn't believe that I would run across the road
without looking? no?

So you say "antigravity" and the scientific establishment says "what a
crackpot, huhuhu" If you cite a theory and you have the credentials to
back up your opinion. Well that doesn't mean we cant cancel your
funding and prevent you from ever getting a job. huhuhu!!

Think of it like Wikipedia,

From the outside it promotes it self as an encyclopedia edited by the
masses.

But when you read the TOS then one can only conclude that FOX news has
more credibility then YOU.

You can do a million double blind tests type out a million pages and
record a million hours of evidence. For wikipeidia it will always be
"original research".

If you dare say the word plasma reactor outside the context of a movie
you are going to get it.

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22plasma+reactor

Looking for geet, we can still find pantone!(On page 2)

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22geet

"Some how" a million science links is not a sign of credibility.

http://www.google.com/search?q=geet

Here is your detailed seminar:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2KRRgjcJTg

does it work?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5238596150388648518

well does it?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1489924129552184014

That is clearly something we should ignore isn't it?

If there is any response to this post at best some imbecile will
advocate the absolute truth of his guess work. Mark my words! We cant
go ask the pschopaths when they are going to release the inventor?

http://geetfriends.net

Ah yes, in prison for thinking he could violate conversation of
petroleum.

Does that show you what people can do with Einsteins work?

I'm sorry, I cant entertain erroneous guesswork up to pretending it is
something I know for sure and killing people over it seems way over
the hill.

The size of the earth doesn't lie? TESLA's described the waves from
his wireless electricity system as going faster around the globe then
the speed of light. Nothing indicates this was a guess. Guessing it
away seems rather silly. There is no argument for it.

But we cant have you thinking about crazy stuff like that. You would
get all kinds of economically undesirable ideas and we cant allow that
to happen now can we?

Perhaps you can in stead pick up economy and study the business cycle?
hahahahahaha

Or our self-proclaimed primitive History.... hahahahahaha....

We ar so advanced, look at all those smart machines we can purchase? I
mean now knowing how your own tools work is a sign of great intellect
isn't it?

Maybe not! huhuhu

___
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
http://forum.go-here.nl
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl
http://clean-nuclear-energy.go-here.nl

Androcles

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:12 am

Guest

This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

"Sanny" <softtanks@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:73ac811a-1e85-4ed1-8781-d52ae559b3da@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
| Every theory has many Applications.

No they don't.

|
| What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

Why pick in that clown?

Dono

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:14 am

Guest

The troll who pretends to be an idiot is back Smile

gaby de wilde

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:21 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 7:14 pm, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:

The troll who pretends to be an idiot is back Smile

Eventho I should be grateful for getting any response at all. I had
already guessed the outcome of your thoughts. It was everything I
expected it to be and less. If you want to claim it is worth my time
arguing with you then please make it evident.

My guess says you are futile. :-)

Thanks,

______
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
http://forum.go-here.nl
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl
http://wind-car.go-here.nl
http://clean-nuclear-energy.go-here.nl

[unsnip]
On Apr 28, 6:52 pm, gaby de wilde <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

On Apr 28, 2:09 pm, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Why is this theory so confusing?

It's the people arround the theory who confuse things. Most are well
aware of getting tricked into studing nonsense. This doesn't mean they
accept the undenialble fact.

You will be surpriced how the light speed entogiasts refuse to address
the verfy subject.

A long story short:

If you bring up any of the following subject you will find 99% of
mankind is brainwashed into disbelieving.

Aliens
Remote viewing
Historical high tech civilisations.
Zero point energy
Gravity engines
Anti gravity
Bio plasma
Resonance
Time travel
Telekinesis
etc etc

You don't need others to help you find the evidence, just look at your
own response. What is your prefered tactic to figure out the truth
under those topics?

1 - to guess?

or

2 - to investigate?

Now ask yourself: Is it worth bringing up any subject when knowing the
only response you are going to get is of type 1?

It's easy to defraud this. If type 1 conclusions are rational in your
world view then it becomes easy to guess what lack of content your
response will have. It becomes very much worth it not to trigger such
response.The review describes the lack of review and nothing else.

Their thoughts lack so much depth that by bringing up a subject they
instantaneously assume you have subscribed to it as if a divine fact.

When crossing the road I look left and right for traffic. This doesn't
mean I think there is a car. It means I want to know IF THERE IS A
CAR. Surely if I look out when crossing the road I must believe there
is also a car? If I didn't believe that I would run across the road
without looking? no?

So you say "antigravity" and the scientific establishment says "what a
crackpot, huhuhu" If you cite a theory and you have the credentials to
back up your opinion. Well that doesn't mean we cant cancel your
funding and prevent you from ever getting a job. huhuhu!!

Think of it like Wikipedia,

From the outside it promotes it self as an encyclopedia edited by the
masses.

But when you read the TOS then one can only conclude that FOX news has
more credibility then YOU.

You can do a million double blind tests type out a million pages and
record a million hours of evidence. For wikipeidia it will always be
"original research".

If you dare say the word plasma reactor outside the context of a movie
you are going to get it.

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22plasma+reactor

Looking for geet, we can still find pantone!(On page 2)

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22geet

"Some how" a million science links is not a sign of credibility.

http://www.google.com/search?q=geet

Here is your detailed seminar:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2KRRgjcJTg

does it work?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5238596150388648518

well does it?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1489924129552184014

That is clearly something we should ignore isn't it?

If there is any response to this post at best some imbecile will
advocate the absolute truth of his guess work. Mark my words! We cant
go ask the pschopaths when they are going to release the inventor?

http://geetfriends.net

Ah yes, in prison for thinking he could violate conversation of
petroleum.

Does that show you what people can do with Einsteins work?

I'm sorry, I cant entertain erroneous guesswork up to pretending it is
something I know for sure and killing people over it seems way over
the hill.

The size of the earth doesn't lie? TESLA's described the waves from
his wireless electricity system as going faster around the globe then
the speed of light. Nothing indicates this was a guess. Guessing it
away seems rather silly. There is no argument for it.

But we cant have you thinking about crazy stuff like that. You would
get all kinds of economically undesirable ideas and we cant allow that
to happen now can we?

Perhaps you can in stead pick up economy and study the business cycle?
hahahahahaha

Or our self-proclaimed primitive History.... hahahahahaha....

We ar so advanced, look at all those smart machines we can purchase? I
mean now knowing how your own tools work is a sign of great intellect
isn't it?

Maybe not! huhuhu

___
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
http://forum.go-here.nl
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl
http://clean-nuclear-energy.go-here.nl

Androcles

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:55 am

Guest

This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

<amusingname@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ac7c904c-6d02-497a-8858-2a4eaa780b36@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
Let me try to address your comments:

On Apr 28, 8:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

Einstein is the proper spelling.

Quote:

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

| Actually, the statement is that light always travels at c through
| vacuum.

Actually, the statements are:

"light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which
is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body"
and
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in
the stationary system, with the velocity c-v,"
so you can't even get that right.

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:20 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 7:09 am, Sanny <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

Not what he said. He said that's true for a vacuum, not through
material media.

Quote:

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

2. Light Speed is Constant always.

Some people have made Light Travel faster than C? is it true?

No.

Quote:

3.

Just like when in a car we are travelling at X Speed and we throw a
ball inside the car at Y Speed in direction of car. For an outsider
the Speed of Ball will be X+Y.

No, that's not right, though it works close enough as a useful
approximation to be commonly used.
For an outsider the speed of the ball will in fact be (X+Y)/(1 + X*Y/
c^2).
This may surprise you that it's so complicated. It's not any more
complicated than it needs to be.

Quote:

Now, repeat this calculation and do it the right way. Tell me what you
get.

Quote:

But Einstine says nothing can go at more than c?

Why are so many people saying Einstine theory is wrong?

What does current science tell about his theory?

That it appears to be right so far.

Quote:

Why is this theory so confusing?

It's not confusing. It's exactly what nature does. It's just that the
mental concepts that we put together from our slow-moving, macroscopic
corner of the universe are just approximations that work well in that
corner but aren't right in general.

Quote:

It says a person travelling in a
spacecraft at Light Speed Time will travel Slower in that Craft and
when he returns back to Earth after 1 hour he will see everyone has
grown 50 Years Older?

Are these just Fantasis or they are correct?

They're correct. They've been measured.

Quote:

Bye
Sanny

Extreme Discussions at:http://www.getclub.com/Discussion.php

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:56 am

Guest

On Apr 28, 4:52 pm, knucmo <knucmo23...@433234.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:09:30 -0700 (PDT), Sanny

softta...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Every theory has many Applications.

What are the things that take help of Einstine theories?

First, what are the theories he predicted?

For Ex:
1. Light travels at Speed C Always

I learnt through Solid Lenses and Water the Speed of light changes
depending on Refractive Index of medium?

2. Light Speed is Constant always.

Some people have made Light Travel faster than C? is it true?

In QM, there are certain effects that are transmitted

Transmitted? No.

Quote:

at speeds
quicker than C - action at a distance.

Paul Mays

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:39 pm

Guest

"Dono" <sa_ge@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ba74aab3-fafa-4b8c-b95c-0bb820bd1ca7@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

Quote:

The troll who pretends to be an idiot is back :-)

And this time he's not pretending ...

Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next All times are GMT - 5 Hours The time now is Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:23 pm Science Forum Index