explains why the planet is experiencing global warming over the past
110 years. In summary, we have global warming because our Sun's
output has been increasing since the 1890s. It varies with the
sunspot cycle. The problem is that each successive sunspot cycle has
been getting greater and greater. The reason for this is we are
approaching another geomagnetic polar reversal, with a high
probability it will happen between September and December 2046 during
the next Gleissberg cycle.

and evaporates a great amount of ocean water that eventually falls
back on the earth as snow, thousands of feet of snow.

If you were born after 1979 you will not receive a dime of your
social security benefits because the USA will not exist after the
next geomagnetic reversal in 2046, so you should be very interested
in what I have discovered.

I have discovered 6 blank periods in space where no stars are
visible.

Four of the six are 12,068 years apart. I have correlated 6
geomagnetic reversals and 6 ice age advances with the same 12,000+/-
clock cycle (c^14 dating).

I fact all the of the phenomena associated
with the polar reversal and ice age my model can explain including
the creation of new species.

I believe the evidence I have accumulated is irrefutable. NASA knows
our Sun novas but they do not know why or when the next polar
reversal will occur-I do.

The culmination of my research is in my
book "God's Day of Judgment; The Real Cause of Global Warming"
(2007). I have excerpts of all the chapters on the publisher's web
page that you can read. Chapter 3 explains my information theory of
existence that enabled me to explain the polar reversal.
http://www.vectorpub.com/Gods_Day_of_judgment.html
God (if He/She exists) is omnipotent and omniscient. For all we know,

I believe I have discovered the cause of the geomagnetic reversals and why
the ice age occurs immediately after the polar reversal. I know some of you
will say that a complete reversal only happens every 700,000 years but that
is an old assumption. Geologists now know that there is ample proof of
short-term reversals that correlate to about 12,000 year cycles. I have
discovered the exact number of years between these reversals (12,068 years).

I believe the evidence I have accumulated is irrefutable.

http://www.vectorpub.com/Gods_Day_of_judgment.html

The culmination of my research is in my book "God's Day of Judgment; The

In article <hJSdnUuUl7BSgnLanZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Abelard" <archive1111@hotmail.com> wrote:

I believe I have discovered the cause of the geomagnetic reversals and
why
the ice age occurs immediately after the polar reversal. I know some of
you
will say that a complete reversal only happens every 700,000 years but
that
is an old assumption. Geologists now know that there is ample proof of
short-term reversals that correlate to about 12,000 year cycles. I have
discovered the exact number of years between these reversals (12,068
years).

That's a remarkable discovery, considering that all kinds of other
evidence show that he period is variable.

I believe the evidence I have accumulated is irrefutable.

Mostly because you haven't presented any of it.

http://www.vectorpub.com/Gods_Day_of_judgment.html

I'm willing to examine this with an open mind. For instance, the
possibilities that you're not actually serious, but are a complete
nutter, or a joker, has crossed my mind, and deserve further scrutiny.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." <Chris L.

I saw you web page and all I can say is taht you have problems.

But let me tell you that you are going to have a lot more
problems in 38+ years when this event happens.

I suggest that you should be open minded

Read my stuff and then try to prove me wrong.

In article <sv6dna6eUJmTd3LanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com>,
D Vogt <sales@vectorpub.com> wrote:

I saw you web page and all I can say is taht you have problems.

Well, he might have problems but at least he knows not to top
post.

But let me tell you that you are going to have a lot more
problems in 38+ years when this event happens.

Yeah, right.

I suggest that you should be open minded

Having an open mind doesn't mean one has to let the sewage in.
You are just one of many kooks that come by sge; we've all seen
it before and nary a one has said anything that wasn't to be
laughed at.

In article <sv6dna6eUJmTd3LanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com>,
D Vogt <sales@vectorpub.com> wrote:

I saw you web page and all I can say is taht you have problems.

Well, he might have problems but at least he knows not to top
post.

But let me tell you that you are going to have a lot more
problems in 38+ years when this event happens.

Yeah, right.

I suggest that you should be open minded

Having an open mind doesn't mean one has to let the sewage in.
You are just one of many kooks that come by sge; we've all seen
it before and nary a one has said anything that wasn't to be
laughed at.

Dear Timberwoof or what ever your name really is.

Ellis,
I can tell you are not a scientist nor do you understand what a scientific
mind is supposed to behave. You are supposed to be open minded and read
other points of view. How do youknow if I'm wrong unless you read what I
discovered?

ellis,
Read my stuff and then try to prove me wrong.

I climbed Mount Everest. Prove me wrong.

I *thought* I knew your name from somewhere. It was me in the

In article <BVXHj.3365$n53.2411@fe127.usenetserver.com>, Skywise wrote:
I climbed Mount Everest. Prove me wrong.

I *thought* I knew your name from somewhere. It was me in the
orange hat!

I *thought* I knew your name from somewhere. It was me in the
orange hat!

Oh!! Weren't you the one who lost a crampon about 8900 meters?