| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Environment Forum » Thank White Liberals For The Mess We're In
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Reginald Washington |
 Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Especially the white liberals who are tinged green.
They oughta be extinguished. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| kT |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 28, 10:28 am, Liberal'sWorstNightm...@home.home (Reginald
Washington) wrote:
Quote: Especially the white liberals who are tinged green.
They oughta be extinguished.
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
You are a violent criminal fascist, blaming others for your own mess.
Enjoy the fruits of your fascist labors :
http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/britt_23_2.htm
Analysis of these seven regimes reveals fourteen common threads that
link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior and abuse of
power. These basic characteristics are more prevalent and intense in
some regimes than in others, but they all share at least some level of
similarity.
1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the
prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins,
the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the
regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always
obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity
were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually
coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on
xenophobia.
2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves
viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing
the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda,
the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by
marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was
egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.
3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most
significant common thread among these regimes was the use of
scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other
problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in
controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and
disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite
“spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists,
socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional
national enemies, members of other religions, secularists,
homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were
inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.
4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always
identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure
that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was
allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The
military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used
whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations,
and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.
5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and
the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably
viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-
abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in
Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of
the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.
6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media
were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to
stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power
to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing
and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and
implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically
compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in
keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.
7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security
apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually
an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any
constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting
“national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as
unpatriotic or even treasonous.
8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes,
the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless
by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves
to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray
themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the
ruling elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the
religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the
illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and
opponents of the “godless.” A perception was manufactured that
opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.
9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of
ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large
corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The
ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure
military production (in developed states), but also as an additional
means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often
pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of
interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.
10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was
seen as the one power center that could challenge the political
hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was
inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass,
viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being
poor was considered akin to a vice.
11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts.
Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression
associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and
academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and
the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically
unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or
expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed.
To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national
interest or they had no right to exist.
12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes
maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison
populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked
power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were
often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used
against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of
criminals or “traitors” was often promoted among the population as an
excuse for more police power.
13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and
close to the power elite often used their position to enrich
themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would
receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in
turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the
power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other
sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the
national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this
corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the
general population.
14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or
public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with
candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power
elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining
control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising
opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a
last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.
Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is
America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution,
a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly
being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these
are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:28 am |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 28, 8:28 am, Liberal'sWorstNightm...@home.home (Reginald
Washington) wrote:
Quote: Especially the white liberals who are tinged green.
They oughta be extinguished.
So, you advocate the execution of those that you don't agree with?
How fundamentalist Islamic of you. You'd probably be happier in a
theocracy like Iran then. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Frank Arthur |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
WASHINGTON, May 27 - Exxon Mobil has publicly
softened its stance toward global warming over the last year, with a
pledge of $10 million in annual donations for 10 years to Stanford
University for climate research.
At the same time, the company, the world's largest
oil and gas concern, has increased donations to Washington-based
policy groups that, like Exxon itself, question the human role in
global warming and argue that proposed government policies to limit
carbon dioxide emissions associated with global warming are too heavy
handed.
Exxon now gives more than $1 million a year to such
organizations, which include the Competitive Enterprise Institute,
Frontiers of Freedom, the George C. Marshall Institute, the American
Council for Capital Formation Center for Policy Research and the
American Legislative Exchange Council.
The organizations are modest in size but have been
outspoken in the global warming debate. Exxon has become the
single-largest corporate donor to some of the groups, accounting for
more than 10 percent of their annual budgets. While a few of the
groups say they also receive some money from other oil companies, it
is only a small fraction of what they receive from Exxon Mobil.
"We want to support organizations that are trying to
broaden the debate on an issue that is so important to all of us,"
said Tom Cirigliano, a spokesman for Exxon. "There is this whole issue
that no one should question the science of global climate change that
is ludicrous. That's the kind of dark-ages thinking that gets you in a
lot of trouble." He also noted, "These are not single-agenda groups."
"Reginald Washington" <Liberal'sWorstNightmare@home.home> wrote in
message news:4815ed1c.17284875@news.motzarella.org...
Quote: Especially the white liberals who are tinged green.
They oughta be extinguished. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Reginald Washington" <Liberal'sWorstNightmare@home.home> wrote
Quote: Especially the white liberals who are tinged green.
Vulcans in other words.
Someone inform the Alien Police.
MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: They oughta be extinguished.
<neutralino@gmail.com> wrote
Quote: So, you advocate the execution of those that you don't agree with?
How fundamentalist Islamic of you. You'd probably be happier in a
theocracy like Iran then.
What else did you expect from a Fascist Bush Supporter? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:15 am
|
|