----------------------------
"terrylhewettsr" <terrylhewettsr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fs24gj$b7i$1@news.netins.net...
"Don Kelly" <dhky@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:vh%Ej.105405$pM4.45395@pd7urf1no...
----------------------------
"terrylhewettsr" <terrylhewettsr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fs1g0p$uja$1@news.netins.net...
Invention is the marriage of mechanics and the sciences With
innovations in both fields.
I am an inventor of highly innovative technology. The technology is
basic at best.
however the byproducts are many. Everything is relative through spin.
Fluid dynamics
implicates that every atom of it is spinning. Some extremely slow such
as a solid. the
specific gravity and kinetic energy are fully conserved. It's seemingly
at rest.
Inventing is mostly problem solving. How great your invention? is
directly related to how
great the problem you set out to solve. Induction one of Faraday's
brain child's. The act
of putting a changing magnetic flux field through an induction coil.
The problem is how
to do that cyclic. The answer is a multipole toroid armature. Super
conductance via a
magnetic bearing in an ideal configuration. Caging the toroid armatures
permanent field
arrangement. Path of least resistance predicts the toroid armature will
spin. This is a
frictionless environment with the potential for high efficiency.
The whole goal here was to drive a changing magnetic flux field through
an induction coil
cyclic. It turned out driving multiple changing magnetic flux fields
through several
induction coils cyclic. In essence it is free energy. However the
byproducts of spinning
a mass particularly a ring at hyper extreme rates has the potential to
include
antigravity as a byproduct. Unity is defined as the radius of a
natural sine. Given the
previous the form toroid is unity by form alone. to spin the form
toroid is simply over
unity. The transformations of energy in the SRTT are unified
transforming electric to
kinetic and back to electric cyclic for infinity.
This mechanism is fully multifarious via design variations.
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringdrawingincomplete.jpg
There are two kinds of coils 4 each. drive coils and induction coils.
No pulsing
necessary it is centipedal drive system the drive coils magnetically
cage the permanent
fields of the toroid armature. Electromotive forces as defined by
faraday motivates the
toroid armature seeking the path of least resistance in an eccentric
manner orbital about
the axis. Induction coils inducing elec energy via driving multiple
magnetic flux fields
through 4 induction coils at potentially extreme rates of change. In
comparison it would
be like shaking a faraday flashlight 8,000,000 times a minute.
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringofmagnetswithspacers.jpg
The Armature once in motion is pure kinetic energy with all the
byproducts associated
with spinning mass.
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6r002.jpg Note the
physical magnets placements in comparison to the actual fields
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!centipedalfieldring.jpg OK
the spacing of the
attracting N and S poles has created a extra flux field. It is there in
a physical sense
yet it is pseudo in the sense that it's strong and weak forces can be
easily manipulated.
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/CentipedalDrive.jpg the
following image is how
the fields may look as the armature is caged by the drive coils.
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/fluxlines4.jpg please forgive
the crude
drawings as i don't have a source for computer modeled works. The
prototype is #6 and
will never be completed as a testable model. This mechanism is designed
as a one piece
toroid armature consisting of a ceramic or comparable material that can
be host to a
permanent field that is non conductive.
These drawings are linear this one is the coils and spacing example,
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spoolcoilplacementsm.jpg
this one is a
double slice showing the ring chamber and the molded gear section for
twisting the
chamber/spool for winding coils around the armature,
http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spooldblslicesm.jpg
Anyways if you could direct this transmittal document to those that may
have an interest
in it for peer review or potential research for any specific
implementation. this is
unique highly innovative technology. You and your associates are
presented with a unique
opportunity.
terry
---------------------
The explanation is utter rubbish (e.g. what the hell is the radius of a
natural sine) and the "presentation of a unique opportunity" is the
kicker- both are saying beware the scam.
But supposing, as you apparently are doing, superconductivity and no
friction it appears to be a no loss system so that perpetual motion
could occur without violating conservation of energy (and 100%
efficiency).
All well and good but, even if you could this 100% efficiency (and you
can't) - then what?- all it could do is chase its own tail and be
incapable of doing any useful work which would appear as losses.
Plonk
--
Don Kelly
dhky@shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer
Don tell me about gyroscopic forces and kinetic energy and how things
that are in motion tend to stay in motion. Tell me about electromagnetic
induction. and tell me the effects of driving a changing magnetic flux
field through an induction coil.
Then understand that the toroid armature consists of multiple changing
flux fields going through 4 or by design variations multiple induction
coils cyclic for infinity.
The operational environment is ideal for the transformation of energy at
a hyper extreem rate.
Rubbish or not it's real. radius of a natural sine is a definition of
unity and the most accurate if i might add.
Peer review is the unique oppertunity.
By your own confessions of just a brief review of the technology you
understand that i am utilizing superconductance in the mechanism. That is
un-precedented in the history of man as our knowledge and understanding
is somewhat limited in the technology.
I see where you get the "radius of a natural sine" Unfortunately, you have
it backwards- all that is meant is that the (natural) sine function is
expressed in terms of a unit circle-simply because it is convenient to do
so (vertical component/radius is neater for radius =1). It could as easily
be defined in terms of a circle of radius "2.32" but that would be an
inconvenient nuisance and 1 is a much nicer number. So the fact that the
radius of a unit circle is 1 or unity simply means that it was defined
that way (hence "unit" circle). So all you are saying is that 1=1(exactly)
in a roundabout and rather obfuscating way- and saying:
"Unity is defined as the radius of a natural sine. Given the previous the
form toroid is unity by form alone."
is completely meaningless.
The rest of your statements are still gibberish. What you have is
essentially a toroidal transformer with multiple windings- with
unspecified connections (some shorted? and which may be superconductive
(believe it or not such transformers have been made but don't exhibit any
tendency to have a rotating core). There appears to be no basis for the
contention that the core will rotate. "Path of least resistance " is not
actually a scientific principle of use here (Coulomb's Law and some
understanding of vectors affecting are more applicable but won't help
you), particularly as you are implying a non-conductive core.
Anyhow, you can consider this about as good a peer review as you will
get -and probably the last - at least from me unless you can express
yourself more clearly and use technically appropriate language. Yes, I
do know about kinetic energy, inertia and gyroscopic forces (rusty on the
gyro , I admit ) and am well versed in the effects of changing magnetic
fields in a coil.
--
Don Kelly
dhky@shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer
