|
Science Forum Index » Geology - Meteorology Forum » 0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Crackles McFarly |
 Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David |
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Crackles McFarly wrote:
Quote: 0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed.
No such cycle has been found yet. Do you have anything resembling evidence? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Graham P Davis |
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
David wrote:
Quote: Crackles McFarly wrote:
0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed.
No such cycle has been found yet. Do you have anything resembling
evidence?
A study of 700,000 years data was published in 1975. The cycles reported by
that study do not match the trends of the past thirty years. Although it
showed we should now be on a rising curve of global temperatures, the rise
started about twenty years early. It also "forecast" that the peak of
global temperatures achieved in the 1940s would not be reached again until
the 2030s. In fact, that maximum was passed around 1980 and we're now 0.5C
above the 40s peak.
--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman, not newsboy.
"What use is happiness? It can't buy you money." [Chic Murray, 1919-85] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Crackles McFarly |
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:00:37 -0800, David <nothere@nowhere.org> sayd
the following:
Quote: Crackles McFarly wrote:
0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed.
No such cycle has been found yet. Do you have anything resembling evidence?
I read the 0.08% from a scientific article once, perhaps less than 6
months ago. I read a lot of things and don't make bookmarks or photo
copies of everything I read, sorry.
This was NOT some political speech, article or tv show either.
Why can't we agree ALL SCIENCE is science?
Seems people are taking the science that 'fits' climate change and
throwing the rest away as some political conspiracy.
I will LOOK for the quote again if you'd be willing to read it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Crackles McFarly |
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0000, Graham P Davis
<newsboy@scarlet-jade.com> sayd the following:
Quote: David wrote:
Crackles McFarly wrote:
0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed.
No such cycle has been found yet. Do you have anything resembling
evidence?
A study of 700,000 years data was published in 1975. The cycles reported by
that study do not match the trends of the past thirty years. Although it
showed we should now be on a rising curve of global temperatures, the rise
started about twenty years early. It also "forecast" that the peak of
global temperatures achieved in the 1940s would not be reached again until
the 2030s. In fact, that maximum was passed around 1980 and we're now 0.5C
above the 40s peak.
What does this have to do with the CO2 human contribution to our
atmosphere?
Just asking is all. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David |
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Crackles McFarly wrote:
Quote: On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:00:37 -0800, David <nothere@nowhere.org> sayd
the following:
Crackles McFarly wrote:
0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed.
No such cycle has been found yet. Do you have anything resembling evidence?
I read the 0.08% from a scientific article once, perhaps less than 6
months ago. I read a lot of things and don't make bookmarks or photo
copies of everything I read, sorry.
This was NOT some political speech, article or tv show either.
Why can't we agree ALL SCIENCE is science?
Seems people are taking the science that 'fits' climate change and
throwing the rest away as some political conspiracy.
I will LOOK for the quote again if you'd be willing to read it?
The immediate question is what cycle are you talking about? You'll lose
me fast with numbers. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David |
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Crackles McFarly wrote:
Quote: On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0000, Graham P Davis
newsboy@scarlet-jade.com> sayd the following:
David wrote:
Crackles McFarly wrote:
0.08% = Human contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If all humans on Earth went 'green' right this second it wouldn't stop
or even slow down global warming. Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed.
No such cycle has been found yet. Do you have anything resembling
evidence?
A study of 700,000 years data was published in 1975. The cycles reported by
that study do not match the trends of the past thirty years. Although it
showed we should now be on a rising curve of global temperatures, the rise
started about twenty years early. It also "forecast" that the peak of
global temperatures achieved in the 1940s would not be reached again until
the 2030s. In fact, that maximum was passed around 1980 and we're now 0.5C
above the 40s peak.
What does this have to do with the CO2 human contribution to our
atmosphere?
Just asking is all.
You stated that "Global warming is simply a cycle
that the Earth has experience about a dozen times BEFORE man even
existed". Since h. sapiens has been around for ca. 1,000,000 years, and
the ice-cores only go back 700,000 years, you must be talking about
geological evidence.
We're dying to hear your report. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Crackles McFarly |
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:47:17 -0800, David <nothere@nowhere.org> sayd
the following:
Quote: We're dying to hear your report.
I'm still looking. I'm serious when I say I am not trying to make some
political point with all of this. Just trying to learn about these
things.
It was a quote I read online, I will try to find the quote some more.
Please bear with me. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
