Sheesh...I go away for a day and look what happens!!!

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

On Jan 13, 1:23 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:

It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

You go first.

Hey look, everyone's talking about earthquake insurance, earthquake
safety, earthquake prediction..... WHOA, are we gonna reclaim this
board or what?????

Cheers,

Petra

"Petra" <petras...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:dddd4953-87e2-4283-9f12-eda2a8168b2f@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 13, 7:09 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 1:23 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:

It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

You go first.
Here's some food for thought......
Since the earthquake in Martinique events in Alaska, The Queen
Charlotte Islands and a greater than normal M 6.0+ event took place
off shore Oregon..... is this a new seismicity pattern? And if so,
what might be anticipated to happen in the next 30 days in the western
hemisphere?
Petra

Can you propose a mechanism by which an earthquake in the Eastern Caribbean
would have a causal connection with quakes in Alaska and the Pacific
Northwest?

Are you able to consider that there might be no connection of any sort?

Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA USA

On Jan 13, 1:23 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:

It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

You go first.

Here's some food for thought......

Since the earthquake in Martinique events in Alaska, The Queen
Charlotte Islands and a greater than normal M 6.0+ event took place
off shore Oregon..... is this a new seismicity pattern? And if so,
what might be anticipated to happen in the next 30 days in the western
hemisphere?

Petra

On Jan 13, 1:56 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:





"Petra" <petras...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:dddd4953-87e2-4283-9f12-eda2a8168b2f@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 13, 7:09 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 1:23 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:

 > It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

You go first.
Here's some food for thought......
Since the earthquake in Martinique events in Alaska, The Queen
Charlotte Islands and a greater than normal M 6.0+ event took place
off shore Oregon..... is this a new seismicity pattern?  And if so,
what might be anticipated to happen in the next 30 days in the western
hemisphere?
Petra

Can you propose a mechanism by which an earthquake in the Eastern Caribbean
would have a causal connection with quakes in Alaska and the Pacific
Northwest?

Are you able to consider that there might be no connection of any sort?

Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA USA

Hi Mike.  Petra and I have taken a lot of heat over the years in
regards to remote triggering.  Ten years ago there wasn't any
mainstream scientist willing to go public about remote triggering of a
quake by another quake because of the negative comments from their
colleagues.  However that seems to be changing.

The problem with far field aftershocks, remote triggering, or whatever
you want to call it is that you don't know where they are going to
occur.

When the Denali quake occurred the Wasatch fault in Utah lit up.
Small quakes were occurring along the whole length of the fault.

At present time most scientists are looking at faults near the
epicenters of large quakes, but there are a few who are looking
halfway around the World.

Remote triggering is in its infancy and in all probability it will be
years before it is truly understood if ever.  Just because you can't
see a connection doesn't mean there isn't one.  It means that you
aren't looking for one.  Don

http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/96/1/80.pdf

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_2_110/ai_71317742

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080103124649.htm

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/05/21/MN238485....

http://www.quakes.uq.edu.au/ACES_WS1_proc/PDF/2.3_1.pdf

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.earth.33....

http://www.bgu.ac.il/geol/classes/hazard/Front/lec05.pdf- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Jan 13, 1:56 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:





"Petra" <petras...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:dddd4953-87e2-4283-9f12-eda2a8168b2f@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 13, 7:09 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 1:23 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:

It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

You go first.
Here's some food for thought......
Since the earthquake in Martinique events in Alaska, The Queen
Charlotte Islands and a greater than normal M 6.0+ event took place
off shore Oregon..... is this a new seismicity pattern? And if so,
what might be anticipated to happen in the next 30 days in the western
hemisphere?
Petra

Can you propose a mechanism by which an earthquake in the Eastern
Caribbean
would have a causal connection with quakes in Alaska and the Pacific
Northwest?

Are you able to consider that there might be no connection of any sort?

Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA USA

Hi Mike. Petra and I have taken a lot of heat over the years in
regards to remote triggering. Ten years ago there wasn't any
mainstream scientist willing to go public about remote triggering of a
quake by another quake because of the negative comments from their
colleagues. However that seems to be changing.

The problem with far field aftershocks, remote triggering, or whatever
you want to call it is that you don't know where they are going to
occur.

When the Denali quake occurred the Wasatch fault in Utah lit up.
Small quakes were occurring along the whole length of the fault.

At present time most scientists are looking at faults near the
epicenters of large quakes, but there are a few who are looking
halfway around the World.

Remote triggering is in its infancy and in all probability it will be
years before it is truly understood if ever. Just because you can't
see a connection doesn't mean there isn't one. It means that you
aren't looking for one. Don

http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/96/1/80.pdf

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_2_110/ai_71317742

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080103124649.htm

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/05/21/MN238485....

http://www.quakes.uq.edu.au/ACES_WS1_proc/PDF/2.3_1.pdf

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.earth.33....

http://www.bgu.ac.il/geol/classes/hazard/Front/lec05.pdf- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks Don,

Now that I'm finished with musical composition I should add a note
here that one of the primary reasons I broke random chance is as a
direct result of issuing predictions based upon far field triggering,
which included a prediction in November for Israel. To me there was no
doubt it was going to occur and fortunately in the time frame and
correct radius I used.

Given it's success, I did send the data for prediction formulation to
the seismologists in Israel so they could have a look see, especially
in light of their expectation of a major event in their region. I
hope it proves useful.

While some theories are difficult to accept it does help if something
is proven successful to demonstate it's usefulness and moreso in real
time.

Petra

On Jan 13, 1:56 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:
"Petra" <petras...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:dddd4953-87e2-4283-9f12-eda2a8168b2f@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 13, 7:09 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 1:23 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw...@pacbell.net> wrote:

It'd be nice to see some seismology being discussed again . . .

You go first.
Here's some food for thought......
Since the earthquake in Martinique events in Alaska, The Queen
Charlotte Islands and a greater than normal M 6.0+ event took place
off shore Oregon..... is this a new seismicity pattern? And if so,
what might be anticipated to happen in the next 30 days in the western
hemisphere?
Petra

Can you propose a mechanism by which an earthquake in the Eastern
Caribbean
would have a causal connection with quakes in Alaska and the Pacific
Northwest?

Are you able to consider that there might be no connection of any sort?

Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA USA

Hi Mike. Petra and I have taken a lot of heat over the years in
regards to remote triggering. Ten years ago there wasn't any
mainstream scientist willing to go public about remote triggering of a
quake by another quake because of the negative comments from their
colleagues. However that seems to be changing.

The problem with far field aftershocks, remote triggering, or whatever
you want to call it is that you don't know where they are going to
occur.

When the Denali quake occurred the Wasatch fault in Utah lit up.
Small quakes were occurring along the whole length of the fault.

At present time most scientists are looking at faults near the
epicenters of large quakes, but there are a few who are looking
halfway around the World.

Remote triggering is in its infancy and in all probability it will be
years before it is truly understood if ever. Just because you can't
see a connection doesn't mean there isn't one. It means that you
aren't looking for one. Don

http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/96/1/80.pdf

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_2_110/ai_71317742

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080103124649.htm

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/05/21/MN238485.DTL&type=news

http://www.quakes.uq.edu.au/ACES_WS1_proc/PDF/2.3_1.pdf

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505

http://www.bgu.ac.il/geol/classes/hazard/Front/lec05.pdf