Caveat Emptor Nano

A recent Reuters story, Overused, Misused Nano Becoming Pervasive Prefix

(http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=32103

reminds me again of what NanoBusiness Alliance Executive Director Mark
Modzelewski wisely told Small Times reporter David Forman a few months
back following an apparent nanoscam
(http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=5823) that
hit the industry:


http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_08_03_nanobot_archive.html#105999176468056614

"Howard Lovy" <hlovy@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:P5lZa.4906$M6.352328@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...

Caveat Emptor Nano

A recent Reuters story, Overused, Misused Nano Becoming Pervasive Prefix


(http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=32103
83),

reminds me again of what NanoBusiness Alliance Executive Director Mark
Modzelewski wisely told Small Times reporter David Forman a few months
back following an apparent nanoscam
(http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=5823) that
hit the industry:



http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_08_03_nanobot_archive.html#105999176468056614


Thanks for the links - they were very entertaining.
We are developing some materials (powders) in the .2 - .3 um range and we
are stumped on how to include nano in the project name (The word nano gets
our management very excited). Any suggestions ; )

Gregg wrote:
"Howard Lovy" <hlovy@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:P5lZa.4906$M6.352328@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...

Caveat Emptor Nano

A recent Reuters story, Overused, Misused Nano Becoming Pervasive Prefix



(http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=32103
83),

reminds me again of what NanoBusiness Alliance Executive Director Mark
Modzelewski wisely told Small Times reporter David Forman a few months
back following an apparent nanoscam
(http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=5823) that
hit the industry:




http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_08_03_nanobot_archive.html#105999176468056614


Thanks for the links - they were very entertaining.
We are developing some materials (powders) in the .2 - .3 um range and
we
are stumped on how to include nano in the project name (The word nano
gets
our management very excited). Any suggestions ; )



Management gets excited, but not so excited as to be intelligently
creative?

Nano-stuff .....

But, your stuff is kind of big to be called "Nano". The old
'sub-micron' is more accurate.
Accurate? - does that have something to do with - truth in marketing?

Ober-nano.... if you have a German flavor to it.
- Thanks - I'll spread the word ;-)

Jim Buch

--
...............................


Keepsake gift for young girls.
Unique and personal one-of-a-kind.
Builds strong minds 12 ways.
Guaranteed satisfaction
- courteous money back
- keep bonus gifts

http://www.alicebook.com

We are developing some materials (powders) in the .2 - .3 um range and we
are stumped on how to include nano in the project name (The word nano gets
our management very excited). Any suggestions ; )

"Howard Lovy" <hlovy@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:P5lZa.4906$M6.352328@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
Caveat Emptor Nano

A recent Reuters story, Overused, Misused Nano Becoming Pervasive Prefix

(http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=32103
83),
reminds me again of what NanoBusiness Alliance Executive Director Mark
Modzelewski wisely told Small Times reporter David Forman a few months
back following an apparent nanoscam
(http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=5823) that
hit the industry:


http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_08_03_nanobot_archive.html#105999176468056614


Thanks for the links - they were very entertaining.
We are developing some materials (powders) in the .2 - .3 um range and we
are stumped on how to include nano in the project name (The word nano gets
our management very excited). Any suggestions ; )