Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Anthropology Forum  »  Chinese Mythology
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Martin Phipps
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 4:53 am
Guest
Sorry, I left my reference at home. It's a book from the Overseas
Chinese Library called "Prehistoric China". It's book #1301 in the
Overseas Chinese Library collection. I read in this book about old
Chinese myths and legends and some of them might be of interest to
this group.

One story is that fire was invented when a Chinese man observed a bird
pecking at some dry wood. The man saw sparks flying and when he did
the same thing with a stone he invented fire.

Another story states that agriculture was invented when a leader in
prehistoric China took it upon himself to sample small quantities of
different grains to find out which ones were poisonous and which ones
were good to eat. Legends in China always get passed down in such a
way as to make their leaders appear as saintly as possible. It is
more likely that "volunteers" were lined up to sample different grains
and that by observing who did and did not get sick the people in
ancient China were able to determine which plants should be harvested
and which ones should be weeded out. Still, it's amazing to me to
read that the Chinese people knew about the scientific method (or at
least the concept of experimentation) way long before those of us in
the West came up with the idea.

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals. Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

Perhaps Westerners are also more likely to believe in aliens too.
Most Asian people I've spoken to think that stories about UFOs are
crap but a lot of Westerners (a significantly large percentage?)
believe that there are aliens amongst us even though it flies in the
face of common sense to think that they would bother to do so, let
alone look anything like us to begin with!

I know, just when you thought I was gone for good I come back with not
one but _two_ posts with a bunch of new questions. Oh dear.

Martin
neepy
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 9:36 am
Guest
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312070153.2fa85da2@posting.google.com>...
Quote:

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans.

There seem to be plenty of gods in Chinese mythology:

http://www.pantheon.org/areas/mythology/asia/chinese/articles.html
Steve Hayes
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:37 pm
Guest
On 7 Dec 2003 01:53:14 -0800, phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote:

Quote:
As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals. Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

Kuan Ti: the god of war.

In almost every Chinese house there is an altar on the wall containing
a picture of Kuan Ti, the red-faced god of war. It always faces the
entrance, for demons and evil spirits do not dare to enter into his
presence. He is the greatest and most powerful god in the pantheon. Prior
to his deification, Kuan Ti was a historical figure who lived from AD
162-220. He was a mighty warrior. In about AD 184 there had been a peasant
rebellion against the Han dynasty. The rebels were called Yellow Turbans
from the scarves they tied round their heads. The empire was in chaos, and
was effectively ruled by a succession of warlords, and was divided into
three kingdoms, Wei in the north, Wu in the south and Shu in the west. Kuan
Yu, whose original name was Yun-chang, had been outlawed, but formed a
force in the service of general Yuan Shao with two "brothers", the senior
of whom was Liu Pei. In a time of shifting loyalties, he was admired for
his loyalty to Liu Pei. It was the fusion of "might" and "right" that led
to his deification. He was betrayed and beheaded, and his spirit appeared
to a Buddhist priest who instructed him in the law. In the 7th century his
cult was adopted by the Buddhists
Source: Chamberlain (1987:47).

Pak Tai: Emperor of the North.

Pak Tai is sometimes confused with Kuan Ti because they do much the
same job in heaven. In order to fit him into the Taoist scheme whereby gods
achieve their place in heaven through a prior earthly existence, there have
been several biographies. He is said to have lived around 2000 BC, and most
of the stories of him have the same elements - warer, bare feet, and a
sudden transference to heaven. There is less divergence about what he did
there. Two monsters, a tortoise and a snake, were ravaging the earth. Pak
Tai was placed at the head of the heavenly armies and sent to earth to
subdue them. Barefoot, his hair flowing over his shoulders, and wearing a
long black robe, Pak Tai destroyed the monsters. He flung them down a huge
chasm in Szechuan, which is regarded as the mouth of hell. On his return he
was made first lord of heaven.
Source: Chamberlain (1987:56).

The Purple Planet.

The Purple Planet is the Pole Star which, because of its fixity in the
heavens was an image of imperial stability. His image acts as a defence
against evil spirits. Like all ancient civilizations the Chinese posited a
relationship between the order of society and the harmony of the heavens.
Yellow and purple were regarded as complementary colours. He is shown as a
bald man riding a green tiger, though it looks more like a Pekinese dog.
Source: Chamberlain (1987) 62ff).


Steve Hayes
hayesmstw@hotmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm
Martin Phipps
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 9:29 pm
Guest
dsutherland7@hotmail.com (neepy) wrote in message news:<d4bd1f7c.0312070636.a42cd03@posting.google.com>...
Quote:
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312070153.2fa85da2@posting.google.com>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans.

There seem to be plenty of gods in Chinese mythology:

http://www.pantheon.org/areas/mythology/asia/chinese/articles.html

They all seem to be diefications of actual people from Chinese history.

Martin
Martin Phipps
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 9:52 pm
Guest
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312070153.2fa85da2@posting.google.com>...
Quote:
Sorry, I left my reference at home. It's a book from the Overseas
Chinese Library called "Prehistoric China". It's book #1301 in the
Overseas Chinese Library collection.

Sorry. #3101. Edited by Lin Chao.

Martin
neepy
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 11:48 am
Guest
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312071829.2f356347@posting.google.com>...
Quote:
dsutherland7@hotmail.com (neepy) wrote in message news:<d4bd1f7c.0312070636.a42cd03@posting.google.com>...
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312070153.2fa85da2@posting.google.com>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans.

There seem to be plenty of gods in Chinese mythology:

http://www.pantheon.org/areas/mythology/asia/chinese/articles.html

They all seem to be diefications of actual people from Chinese history.

Martin

Not all, but if you can't be bothered to go through the list then I
guess you are not really that interested in the subject. How about
"fox spirits", a very common theme in Chinese mythology (which seem to
play the same role as faeries in Western folklore)?
Martin Phipps
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 12:44 am
Guest
dsutherland7@hotmail.com (neepy) wrote in message news:<d4bd1f7c.0312080848.3eb5a275@posting.google.com>...
Quote:
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312071829.2f356347@posting.google.com>...
dsutherland7@hotmail.com (neepy) wrote in message news:<d4bd1f7c.0312070636.a42cd03@posting.google.com>...
phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps) wrote in message news:<df8f4cb4.0312070153.2fa85da2@posting.google.com>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans.

There seem to be plenty of gods in Chinese mythology:

http://www.pantheon.org/areas/mythology/asia/chinese/articles.html

They all seem to be diefications of actual people from Chinese history.

Not all, but if you can't be bothered to go through the list then I
guess you are not really that interested in the subject.

Well, Zhang Guo-lao, Lu Dong-bin, Cao Guo-jiu, Zhong Li-quan, Zhao
Xuan-tan (Cai-Shen), Chih Nu, etc. are refered to as actual historical
figures who have become diefied. It seems as though Chinese custom
has been for people to honour their ancesters and diefy those who were
seen to have done great things while they were alive, much like the
way Catholics honour saints today. I admit I haven't gone through the
whole list and that, given that there appear to be at least hundred
names on the list, no, I'm not interested enough in the subject to
find out the origin of each and every diety on the list. I do wonder
though if the same arguments could be made about Western dieties: I
sincerely doubt that Zeus or Odin were historical figures. I suppose
there could be a bit of both in both Western and Eastern mythology,
some made up dieties in Chinese mythology and some actual historical
figures (Achilles, Odesseus, Paris, Helen of Troy? Hercules???) in
Western mythology.

Martin
Athanasios Styliaras
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 12:08 pm
Guest
I believe that myth's show to us the deeper true
Nim
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2003 6:13 pm
Guest
Please see in.

"Martin Phipps" <phippsmartin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:df8f4cb4.0312070153.2fa85da2@posting.google.com...
Quote:
Sorry, I left my reference at home. It's a book from the Overseas
Chinese Library called "Prehistoric China". It's book #1301 in the
Overseas Chinese Library collection. I read in this book about old
Chinese myths and legends and some of them might be of interest to
this group.

One story is that fire was invented when a Chinese man observed a bird
pecking at some dry wood. The man saw sparks flying and when he did
the same thing with a stone he invented fire.

Another story states that agriculture was invented when a leader in
prehistoric China took it upon himself to sample small quantities of
different grains to find out which ones were poisonous and which ones
were good to eat. Legends in China always get passed down in such a
way as to make their leaders appear as saintly as possible. It is
more likely that "volunteers" were lined up to sample different grains
and that by observing who did and did not get sick the people in
ancient China were able to determine which plants should be harvested
and which ones should be weeded out. Still, it's amazing to me to
read that the Chinese people knew about the scientific method (or at
least the concept of experimentation) way long before those of us in
the West came up with the idea.

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals.

Woah, <eyes widened> THAT is very interesting.

Are there other parts of the world where people
Quote:
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

There also are, literally, "little people" such as the African Pygmies.
Since some of them were in Egypt (as pets?) there is no reason to think that
some of them didn't also find their way into Europe. They'd be little
people, with dark brown skin - strange looking to Europeans back then.

Most of the Chinese "deities" are actually real people, perhaps "made
bigger" or "nicer" over time. Still, it doesn't explain why western people
STILL believe in things that just aren't there. Pelasgians were a somewhat
Asiatic people - and the later Greeks (IE people) made up wild mythology
from Pelasgian stories of real people. Why they'd believe that there were
Gods up there somewhere throwing lightening bolts is a mystery to me.
Asiatics (Altaics) that live in areas where there are cyclones of snow for
storms, don't believe in such things. They know it's "weather."
Quote:

Perhaps Westerners are also more likely to believe in aliens too.
Most Asian people I've spoken to think that stories about UFOs are
crap but a lot of Westerners (a significantly large percentage?)
believe that there are aliens amongst us even though it flies in the
face of common sense to think that they would bother to do so, let
alone look anything like us to begin with!

That could be because the UFO's (legit ones) are just government or airforce
experimental crafts,or secret crafts (cold war stuff). But that's the
crafts. I think the gov admitted to some of it - ?? But the rest of the
stories, the claims of seeing "insectoid" aliens that experimented on them -
I don't know but it could be neurological. It's craziness, imo.
Quote:

I know, just when you thought I was gone for good I come back with not
one but _two_ posts with a bunch of new questions. Oh dear.

Martin
Nim
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2003 6:13 pm
Guest
"Steve Hayes" <hayesmstw@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3fd3c415.182370415@news.saix.net...
Quote:
On 7 Dec 2003 01:53:14 -0800, phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin Phipps)
wrote:

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals. Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

Kuan Ti: the god of war.

An actual person.
Quote:

Source: Chamberlain (1987:47).

I.e., a western person's interpretation of what he was told. Who is to say
his "sources" were speaking the truth?
Quote:

Pak Tai: Emperor of the North.

A real person.
Quote:

Source: Chamberlain (1987:56).

ditto above.
Quote:

The Purple Planet.

The Purple Planet is the Pole Star which, because of its fixity in the
heavens .....

Pole Star is real. At least they knew of the Pole Star.

Quote:
Source: Chamberlain (1987) 62ff).

Ditto above.
Martin Phipps
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:54 am
Guest
"Nim" <yuggya@ppc.com> wrote in message news:<hS6Cb.11661$7p2.2759@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...

Quote:
As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals.

Woah, <eyes widened> THAT is very interesting.

Or it would be if I had anything concrete to back this up. I am in
Taiwanm right now and I've had an opportunity to talk to a couple of
people here about their "gods" and they did tell me that their "gods"
were actual people and I did make the analogy then and there about the
Chinese "gods" and Western saints... but I can't use hearsay on a
sci.* group, can I?

Quote:
Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

There also are, literally, "little people" such as the African Pygmies.
Since some of them were in Egypt (as pets?) there is no reason to think that
some of them didn't also find their way into Europe. They'd be little
people, with dark brown skin - strange looking to Europeans back then.

Well, in the Netherlands, according to Dutch people I've met anyway
(more hearsay!), Santa Claus (Saint Nicholas, the patron saint of
children) has "little black people" working for him so the idea of
elves=pigmies makes sense in this particular case anyway.

Quote:
Most of the Chinese "deities" are actually real people, perhaps "made
bigger" or "nicer" over time.

All right then. Are you Chinese? What is your ethnic background? I
assume Nim is your family name.

People shouldn't forget that Buddhism originated in India and that it
was influenced by Hinduism so Chinese people may very well believe in
such gods but those gods didn't originate from ancient Chinese
mythology. As far as I know, Chinese mythological figures were based
on real people. Can we say the same thing about Hercules or Thor or
even Adam and Eve? Hercules, _maybe_, because in Greek mythology he
was nothing but a very strong person (who was supposed to have been
the son of Zeus), but Thor, Adam, Eve, they all strike me as being
purely mythological.

Martin
Crwydryn
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 10:55 am
Guest
On 13 Dec 2003 02:54:04 -0800, phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin
Phipps) wrote:

Quote:
"Nim" <yuggya@ppc.com> wrote in message news:<hS6Cb.11661$7p2.2759@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals.

Here's another data point for you:

In Japan people used to believe in a creature called "kappa" - a kind
of water goblin. It's my understanding that the mythology surrounding
this creature originated from China, though I don't know which region.
The Japanese "tengu" I think is native, but may also be from China
originally.

Something that's bothering me about your "theory" though is that the
term "Chinese" is really far too broad, since there are several ethnic
groups within the borders of what we call China these days, but you
seem to be speaking only about the dominant group. Have you
investigated the mythologies of these groups? You're in Taiwan, so
have you spoken to people with a knowledge of the indigenous culture,
or only to the relatively recent Chinese?

The reason I ask is because I have a vague memory of having read
somewhere about a type of goblin or demon that was supposed to live in
remote places in Tibet, and I know that in parts of SE Asia there are
a variety of "goblins" or maybe "trolls" that live in forests and the
like.

I'm afraid you may be seeing a pattern where there isn't one.

<continued below>

Quote:

Woah, <eyes widened> THAT is very interesting.

Or it would be if I had anything concrete to back this up. I am in
Taiwanm right now and I've had an opportunity to talk to a couple of
people here about their "gods" and they did tell me that their "gods"
were actual people and I did make the analogy then and there about the
Chinese "gods" and Western saints... but I can't use hearsay on a
sci.* group, can I?

In *this* newsgroup? <g> But here's the thing: is it possible that
there is a body of mythology that has been lost since Christianity
dominated Europe during the Dark Ages in which it would have been
clear that Odin, Zeus and other European gods were based on real
people? How would we go about eliminating this possibility?

Certainly, there are some who suspect historicity in European
mythologies - for example, the Tuatha da Dannan of Ireland and their
battles with the Formians is said by some to be suggestive of the
"invasion" of Britain by farming peoples and their displacement of the
prior H/G population.

Icelandic sagas that describe the deeds of the gods are not so very
different from those describing the deeds of real people - if the
Icelandic skalds who kept them intact long enough for them to be
transcribed in this century hadn't been around, would we be able to
tell the difference?

Was Perseus real, even if the medusa wasn't? Is the medusa pure
fabrication, or representative of something? How much of the Old
Testament is fantasy, and how much is blurred or embellished history?
Does the story of Cain and Abel recount the acts of real brothers, or
is it a vague recollection of hostilities between H/Gs and early
horticultural villages?

Interesting idea, but it looks like there's a lot of things which make
it a lot more complicated. You add a new complication yourself below:

Quote:

Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

There also are, literally, "little people" such as the African Pygmies.
Since some of them were in Egypt (as pets?) there is no reason to think that
some of them didn't also find their way into Europe. They'd be little
people, with dark brown skin - strange looking to Europeans back then.

Well, in the Netherlands, according to Dutch people I've met anyway
(more hearsay!), Santa Claus (Saint Nicholas, the patron saint of
children) has "little black people" working for him so the idea of
elves=pigmies makes sense in this particular case anyway.

Maybe so, but ask yourself this: St.Nicolas is thought to have been a
real person who lived in Turkey during the 4th Century, and the story
of his generosity and purported miracles percolated through to western
Europe. Do the "little black people" originate at the same time as
the story reached the Netherlands? Was it tacked onto the story
somewhere else before reaching the Netherlands? Is it an older tale
that has been rolled into the newer St.Nicolas story? Is it a newer
fabrication, like the names of Santa's reindeer in America? Even more
difficult is this question: is the St.Nicolas story directly derived
from the Turkish saint, or has a patina of Christianity been added to
a much older mythology to make it possible to keep the old traditions?

Quote:

Most of the Chinese "deities" are actually real people, perhaps "made
bigger" or "nicer" over time.

All right then. Are you Chinese? What is your ethnic background? I
assume Nim is your family name.

People shouldn't forget that Buddhism originated in India and that it
was influenced by Hinduism so Chinese people may very well believe in
such gods but those gods didn't originate from ancient Chinese
mythology. As far as I know, Chinese mythological figures were based
on real people. Can we say the same thing about Hercules or Thor or
even Adam and Eve? Hercules, _maybe_, because in Greek mythology he
was nothing but a very strong person (who was supposed to have been
the son of Zeus), but Thor, Adam, Eve, they all strike me as being
purely mythological.

Yes, but if no one told you that the Chinese gods were originally real
people I suspect you would view them as purely mythological as well,
since they don't bear much relation to regular human beings nowadays.

I'm afraid there are too many unanswerable questions when it comes to
determining the exact origin of mythological elements. I doubt the
simple kind of "the little people in western European mythology are a
racial memory of the Neanderthals they were displaced" proposition is
supportable. Even the Tuatha cycle of myths, which are probably much
more recent than the kinds of mythological beliefs you're talking
about, are basically relegated to "hmm. *Could* be..." status.

On the other hand, rest assured that you wouldn't be the first to have
this thought.<g> It's just that it can never be more than speculation,
so you don't see it in print.
--
Kevyn Winkless kevyn at the-winkless.net

'I never met a piece of chocolate I didn't like.'
Nim
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 8:22 pm
Guest
"Crwydryn" <baka@hornedking.com> wrote in message
news:m6bmtvsrhko2ugpiobtal9ira2ntv0j4te@4ax.com...
Quote:
On 13 Dec 2003 02:54:04 -0800, phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin
Phipps) wrote:

"Nim" <yuggya@ppc.com> wrote in message
news:<hS6Cb.11661$7p2.2759@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of
sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I
seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years
ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them,
namely
the neanderthals.

Here's another data point for you:

In Japan people used to believe in a creature called "kappa" - a kind
of water goblin. It's my understanding that the mythology surrounding
this creature originated from China, though I don't know which region.
The Japanese "tengu" I think is native, but may also be from China
originally.

Japanese referred to the Ninpo people as "tengu." They were adepts at
stealth, slight of hand, and other such things that were seen as "magical."
If you had no idea what slight of hand was, or stage magic, and you saw a
person close to you, close up, make a glass vanish, you might think it was
supernatural. If you don't know how to mix chemical to create a smoke bomb,
then a person who can do this, who makes one and "vanishes" in a puff of
smoke might seem as if..... he vanished in a puff of smoke. Neutral You'd know
what you saw. You'd have no idea how it was done. "Those people can vanish
in a puff of smoke." That would be a true statement.

y" though is that the
Quote:
term "Chinese" is really far too broad, since there are several ethnic
groups within the borders of what we call China these days, but you
seem to be speaking only about the dominant group. Have you
investigated the mythologies of these groups?

Some of the other groups would be either Moslem now, or Shamanist/Buddhist.
They are Altaic people.

You're in Taiwan, so
Quote:
have you spoken to people with a knowledge of the indigenous culture,
or only to the relatively recent Chinese?

The reason I ask is because I have a vague memory of having read
somewhere about a type of goblin or demon that was supposed to live in
remote places in Tibet, and I know that in parts of SE Asia there are
a variety of "goblins" or maybe "trolls" that live in forests and the
like.

Refers to other people, sometimes vicious tribes of other people there. As
an example of something, the Chinese have a word "ha kwei" and it literally
means a black destructive demon or spirit. But when they use that term,
they are not referring to supernatural beings at all, but to people whom
they don't like very much. But if they wrote about it: "The black demons
greatly disturbed the other students in the university who had come to study
and learn. The students didn't want to hear the noise that was being made by
the black demons." 20th century account. Not supernatural at all, but it
would sound like it. Do 20th century Chinese believe in demons? No.

t their "gods" and they did tell me that their "gods"
Quote:
were actual people and I did make the analogy then and there about the
Chinese "gods" and Western saints... but I can't use hearsay on a
sci.* group, can I?

In *this* newsgroup? <g> But here's the thing: is it possible that
there is a body of mythology that has been lost since Christianity
dominated Europe during the Dark Ages in which it would have been
clear that Odin, Zeus and other European gods were based on real
people? How would we go about eliminating this possibility?

Didn't Waddell write something about a man named "Dur" claiming that it is
Thor?

Quote:
mythologies - for example, the Tuatha da Dannan of Ireland and their
battles with the Formians is said by some to be suggestive of the
"invasion" of Britain by farming peoples and their displacement of the
prior H/G population.

Icelandic sagas that describe the deeds of the gods are not so very
different from those describing the deeds of real people - if the
Icelandic skalds who kept them intact long enough for them to be
transcribed in this century hadn't been around, would we be able to
tell the difference?

Was Perseus real, even if the medusa wasn't? Is the medusa pure
fabrication, or representative of something?

For some information on who Medusa may have been, please see
http://www.geocities.com/go_darkness/god-medusa.html

Keep in mind that these people wrote such things in a mythopoetic fashion.
Someone having killed such a creature: his group wiped out their group and
their ideas. "Mdusa was turned into"... notions of her in the new society
became different. She was evidently a woman from Libya.

How much of the Old
Quote:
Testament is fantasy, and how much is blurred or embellished history?
Does the story of Cain and Abel recount the acts of real brothers, or
is it a vague recollection of hostilities between H/Gs and early
horticultural villages?

Interesting point . I just happened to look up something after finding a
Bible (Masonic Bible - I hope it's the same thing). Cain was doing
agriculture. Able was hunting or herding cattle (meat). The Jews do say
that none of that can be read literally. The problem with that is that the
religion today, 20t...er, 21st century, *is* being read literally by people
who'd eradicate biology and replace it with mythology. I don't see where
that kind of thing happened anywhere else, except perhaps with the Moslem
religion; and on that I'm not even sure.
Quote:

Interesting idea, but it looks like there's a lot of things which make
it a lot more complicated. You add a new complication yourself below:


Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made
Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

There also are, literally, "little people" such as the African Pygmies.
Since some of them were in Egypt (as pets?) there is no reason to think
that
some of them didn't also find their way into Europe. They'd be little
people, with dark brown skin - strange looking to Europeans back then.

Well, in the Netherlands, according to Dutch people I've met anyway
(more hearsay!), Santa Claus (Saint Nicholas, the patron saint of
children) has "little black people" working for him so the idea of
elves=pigmies makes sense in this particular case anyway.

Maybe so, but ask yourself this: St.Nicolas is thought to have been a
real person who lived in Turkey during the 4th Century, and the story
of his generosity and purported miracles percolated through to western
Europe.

But the entire story of the man, his physical appearance on the sled, all of
that, can be traced to the elder Dionysus in Greece.

Do the "little black people" originate at the same time as
Quote:
the story reached the Netherlands? Was it tacked onto the story
somewhere else before reaching the Netherlands? Is it an older tale
that has been rolled into the newer St.Nicolas story? Is it a newer
fabrication, like the names of Santa's reindeer in America? Even more
difficult is this question: is the St.Nicolas story directly derived
from the Turkish saint, or has a patina of Christianity been added to
a much older mythology to make it possible to keep the old traditions?

Probably all of that.
Quote:


Most of the Chinese "deities" are actually real people, perhaps "made
bigger" or "nicer" over time.

All right then. Are you Chinese? What is your ethnic background? I
assume Nim is your family name.

People shouldn't forget that Buddhism originated in India and that it
was influenced by Hinduism so Chinese people may very well believe in
such gods but those gods didn't originate from ancient Chinese
mythology. As far as I know, Chinese mythological figures were based
on real people. Can we say the same thing about Hercules or Thor or
even Adam and Eve? Hercules, _maybe_, because in Greek mythology he
was nothing but a very strong person (who was supposed to have been
the son of Zeus), but Thor, Adam, Eve, they all strike me as being
purely mythological.

Yes, but if no one told you that the Chinese gods were originally real
people I suspect you would view them as purely mythological as well,
since they don't bear much relation to regular human beings nowadays.

I'm afraid there are too many unanswerable questions when it comes to
determining the exact origin of mythological elements.

Mythopoetic telling of tales back then wouldn't be much different from tales
today. Urban legends? The fish story - Joe in fact struggles with a
fishing line and manages to catch a 5 pound fish. He shares it with his
poor neighbors who have nothing to eat. Days later, it's a 15 pound fish
that he shared with more people. Eventually, Joe struggled with a great
white shark and *fed the entire village*. Put that in writing. The
language is long lost and people have to guess at what the words actually
mean; next it's translated into many languages from the guessings.
Translation: Joe struggled with a great sea monster and fed all the
villagers... to it.

If in a future time, if technology is long gone, and people found print outs
of posts - they'd get a clear idea that trolls used this strange thing
called the internet. Not a joke: you have to know what the word means in
the context of the times, to the people using the word. Obviously, no one
means a literal troll from mythology when they say that. There were no
"wriggling worms" living north of the Chinese who referred to these Altaic
people as that. They were people. For all we know, Holdre may have been a
family name - and the members of the family might have been the equivalent
of the Crips and Bloods of today. Therefore, a "Holdre" (hol-dray) is a
wicked destructive creature. What is "a Hitler?" It's clear what that
means if anyone says it about someone - but it's based on the actual name of
one man. That is how mythopoetic stuff works.

I doubt the
Quote:
simple kind of "the little people in western European mythology are a
racial memory of the Neanderthals they were displaced" proposition is
supportable. Even the Tuatha cycle of myths, which are probably much
more recent than the kinds of mythological beliefs you're talking
about, are basically relegated to "hmm. *Could* be..." status.

On the other hand, rest assured that you wouldn't be the first to have
this thought.<g> It's just that it can never be more than speculation,
so you don't see it in print.

Open speculation is good since it might give someone the idea to try to
trace the origins of such things, go digging, and find a city buried
somewhere.
Quote:
--
Kevyn Winkless kevyn at the-winkless.net

'I never met a piece of chocolate I didn't like.'
Nim
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 8:22 pm
Guest
Please see in,

"Martin Phipps" <phippsmartin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:df8f4cb4.0312130254.16527676@posting.google.com...
Quote:
"Nim" <yuggya@ppc.com> wrote in message
news:<hS6Cb.11661$7p2.2759@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them, namely
the neanderthals.

Woah, <eyes widened> THAT is very interesting.

Or it would be if I had anything concrete to back this up. I am in
Taiwanm right now and I've had an opportunity to talk to a couple of
people here about their "gods" and they did tell me that their "gods"
were actual people and I did make the analogy then and there about the
Chinese "gods" and Western saints... but I can't use hearsay on a
sci.* group, can I?

Sure you can. It may be a sci group, but it's usenet. It's not a peer
reviewed paper. The problem that is encountered these days is also (being
recognized by people in the field doing such work) that many foreigners view
"what gods do you believe in" or similar probing questions as a potentially
hostile question. It is a gut deep and knee jerk reaction to such types of
questions, probing into personal matters. Or even probing into matters
(religion) that they do NOT normally think about much at all. So they LIE.
I've seen it right here, tons of times I personally knew a MD nearby (our
own family doctor for awhile), I had known him quite a long time. From
India, his family is from a Kali sect (Shivaite). They don't have a god
named Kali, or Shiva. These are nothing but representations OF an
incomprehensible and indefinable kind of "universal force" and nothing more.
People, it is understood, have conceptual ideas of this incomprehensible
thing and such things are individually perceived. If enough perceive it
similarly, you end up with a sect. But it's nothing like "the protestant
church down the road." There is no sunday school or praying to these
concepts; tho some might light candles near a statue. But down where I am I
saw this doctor claiming he was a JAIN if asked, and going along with
Christian patients that were heavily into the God thing. It's defensive
behavior, a kind of blending-in, so as NOT to be on the outs even more than
they already are, or more than they feel they are (whether they are or not).
Whole cultures who obviously have a deity that is dark, to say the least,
with some very "western demonic" pictographs to represent this deity, the
name of the deity or concept has the word darkness or blackness in it (eg,
Mahakala, Karabog) - and they switcheroo to some "god of love and light"
when they have to deal with Americans and the media if the issue comes up.
The concepts there are not of gods in the western sense at all, but more of
some kind of unknowable huge darkness in which an incomprehensible light or
fire exists. They are theologically more like atheists and recognized as
such in theological circles. These people, tho they might not have a
religious thought in their bones 24/7, are "put into" the category of
"religious" by the west, by people they meet here, and viewed mostly in that
context. Eg. Tibetans. Most Tibetans are not religious people in the
western sense at all, they go to work, live here, strongly resent being here
and they hate it when white people mistake them for Chinese. I refer to the
many I personally knew, who were in NYC. They had what I'd call a real
"chip on their shoulder." They were even quite rude to the wealthy western
whites that came to see the Dalai Lama; people who were donating a lot of
money to the "free Tibet" cause. This all may have changed since that time;
the next generation might be Americanized. I don't know.

The major problem with the west grasping the concepts of the east is that
the west puts upon non-theistic concepts, a concept of theism, or even of
trinities. They are prone to "see" gods, trinities and so forth" where
there are none. Every people has heroes. Whether you call them Khutukhtu
(living gods) or incarnations (same idea), they are heroes and they are
*real people.* Amithaba or Opame are not people; they are principles.
Someone said to be the incarnation of that, is more or less a person that
embodies that principle and upholds it. Of course, western scholars never
quite get this idea, almost as if it's not inside them TO grasp; but then
they write books with authority. There is a major issue right now in India
over what Brits wrote versus what Indians know (regarding so-called
invasions by Aryans). But for a good eye-ball example, take Sri Kala
Chakra - that's a nice image fit to give a kid notions of the bogeyman, but
it's just a representation of TIME, as time is a "great devourer." A image
of this can be found here with details of what's on the picture:
http://www.geocities.com/go_darkness/god-sri-kala-chakra.html

Yet this is never supposed to represent a person, like Jehova, or Jesus.
Not even close. It's not something good or bad. It just *is*. Like time
just *is*. The thinking is just very atheistic in the NON-theism way. It
might be Deistic, but loosely. Now, someone white, living in the USA, being
told that "oh, that's just all the buddhas coming together to fight the
demons with light" is pure bullshit. But that's what might BE told to a
person asking! It is nothing of the sort. Another problem is the west
versus east consept of the "holy man." In the East, it's a learned scholar
with insights; he may have many wives, many children, he may drink and be
quite fat. This contradicts the western conception of a holy man -
unfortunately one based on mysogynist celibates, imo, deranged slanderers of
free will, nature and life, but who are considered the "great lights" of
Christianity. I see an unbridgeable gulf in thinking, perceptions and
concepts.
Quote:

Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

There also are, literally, "little people" such as the African Pygmies.
Since some of them were in Egypt (as pets?) there is no reason to think
that
some of them didn't also find their way into Europe. They'd be little
people, with dark brown skin - strange looking to Europeans back then.

Well, in the Netherlands, according to Dutch people I've met anyway
(more hearsay!), Santa Claus (Saint Nicholas, the patron saint of
children) has "little black people" working for him so the idea of
elves=pigmies makes sense in this particular case anyway.

I was told by Germanic people that these "little people" are also dark
people or black. Note that the word elf wasn't always so pleasant, I
believe it means "nightmare." I tend to take personal hearsay from a person
in the culture that is a very close friend, a lot more seriously than any
scholarship for a very good reason. I happen to know first hand what
probing scholars are told - versus what the people actually think. Smile I've
seen it all my life. Not just with the Indian doctor, but close to home.
Mahakala is not "all the Buddhas coming together to fight the demons with
light." Mahakala is the "Great Darkness/Blackness." Take Jews, these are
people that aren't even "non-white" in any way. See what they might have to
say among themselves:
http://www.geocities.com/go_darkness/god-jc-myth.html

That certainly is not what Jews said to Christians when the issue of
teaching religion in schools came up locally. Jews were dead set against
it. Christians were for it. Christians were all with "we have the same
God" nonsense, while the Jews nodded. Nothing could be further from the
truth.
Quote:

Most of the Chinese "deities" are actually real people, perhaps "made
bigger" or "nicer" over time.

All right then. Are you Chinese? What is your ethnic background? I
assume Nim is your family name.

I am not Chinese, though some Chinese people would disagree with that
statement even if they know I am not Han at all. Some take that as a
political statement, not an ethnic one.
Quote:

People shouldn't forget that Buddhism originated in India and that it
was influenced by Hinduism so Chinese people may very well believe in
such gods but those gods didn't originate from ancient Chinese
mythology.

Buddhism has no god. That is very well known in theology. Buddha is not a
god at all, and aside from that, there is more than one Buddha. The Sri
Kala Chakra image is part of Buddhsm - the northern variety, and it's not
just Tibetan. It is not a god. It's a picture of "TIME - and what TIME
does." In China, Buddhism took a form that blended with teachings of
Confucius and Taoism (the Tao or DAO is also not a god in any way, shape or
form). In other regions, Buddhism took the form of an already present and
thousands of years old Shamanism. However, if asked personally, by a person
I consider intrusive, I might say that "the Thatness" is my God. "What is
Thatness?" Well, Thatness is One, everything else is THIS. Smile Evasive?
Yes and no. It would depend on who was asking in person. The feel of the
situation would determine my answer. This is the case with every ethnic you
might ask. If you are a scholar, you tend to probe more, they know a book
about them is coming next. They'd either be very evasive, or just lie to
you. That's just the way it is. There is no god in Taoism, Buddhism, and
certainly not in Confucius-ism. You don't have to be here long to know what
the majority feeling is toward "godless people."

As far as I know, Chinese mythological figures were based
Quote:
on real people. Can we say the same thing about Hercules or Thor or
even Adam and Eve? Hercules, _maybe_, because in Greek mythology he
was nothing but a very strong person (who was supposed to have been
the son of Zeus), but Thor, Adam, Eve, they all strike me as being
purely mythological.

I can't speak for the Greek Gods, except to consider that they were
Pelasgian people on whom later IE Greeks put Big Tales, because, whatever
else, those people had science, math, and open dialogues on the cosmos. One
need only see "Euclidean math" in a textbook to realize that. Just imagine
what it would be like had that kind of thinking prevailed and continued from
that early date onward? The Eastern view of life was also more like
evolution. The Adam and Eve story, combined with the Augustinian attitudes
against reason and even math, put humanity back thousands of years and
science had to struggle against the religion to emerge, or reemerge! This
was never the case in the East. The Chinese had technology - they used
foresight and chose not to use it. They had gunpowder, as everyone knows.
If they ever used it in war, they quickly stopped, probably seeing that war
is far too easy to engage in with this kind of weapon. As far as the west
knows, the Chinese never used gunpowder in war. Reading about Altaic
invasions that the west thought were supernatural events, one might conclude
that the Altaic did use gunpowder.

The Chinese have a very farsighted and practical mindset. Example would be
that people in a village are all working; the work is good for the body in
all ways and things are in harmony with the people there, the work being
done, etc. The "machinery" of the work is people; it doesn't have to be
maintained or fixed. Compare that to mechanization, machines ridden by one
person or two, everyone else out of work, machines break and need petroleum
to run. Petroleum has to be gotten from somewhere, it pollutes the air, and
so forth. Hence the Chinese, while having these inventions, chose not to
use any of them. Not long ago, they were against airplanes and cars.
Things have changed!
Quote:

Martin
Mujin
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:06 pm
Guest
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 01:22:40 GMT, "Nim" <yuggya@ppc.com> wrote:

Quote:

"Crwydryn" <baka@hornedking.com> wrote in message
news:m6bmtvsrhko2ugpiobtal9ira2ntv0j4te@4ax.com...
On 13 Dec 2003 02:54:04 -0800, phippsmartin@hotmail.com (Martin
Phipps) wrote:

"Nim" <yuggya@ppc.com> wrote in message
news:<hS6Cb.11661$7p2.2759@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...

As far as I know, the Chinese don't believe in other races of
sentient
creatures existing, no pixies, no elves, no dwarves, no Gods, no
trolls, no angels, no leprechauns, nothing but us humans. I
seriously
believe that Europeans believe in such things because 30 000 years
ago
there really was a race of sentient beings living amongst them,
namely
the neanderthals.

Here's another data point for you:

In Japan people used to believe in a creature called "kappa" - a kind
of water goblin. It's my understanding that the mythology surrounding
this creature originated from China, though I don't know which region.
The Japanese "tengu" I think is native, but may also be from China
originally.

Japanese referred to the Ninpo people as "tengu." They were adepts at
stealth, slight of hand, and other such things that were seen as "magical."
If you had no idea what slight of hand was, or stage magic, and you saw a
person close to you, close up, make a glass vanish, you might think it was
supernatural. If you don't know how to mix chemical to create a smoke bomb,
then a person who can do this, who makes one and "vanishes" in a puff of
smoke might seem as if..... he vanished in a puff of smoke. Neutral You'd know
what you saw. You'd have no idea how it was done. "Those people can vanish
in a puff of smoke." That would be a true statement.

I beg your pardon? I'm afraid I'll require a reference for this
claim. To the best of my knowledge the mythology of the tengu
predates the presence of ninpo or related arts in Japan. Tengu have
been a part of shinto tradition for quite a long time you know.

Quote:

y" though is that the
term "Chinese" is really far too broad, since there are several ethnic
groups within the borders of what we call China these days, but you
seem to be speaking only about the dominant group. Have you
investigated the mythologies of these groups?

Some of the other groups would be either Moslem now, or Shamanist/Buddhist.
They are Altaic people.

You're in Taiwan, so
have you spoken to people with a knowledge of the indigenous culture,
or only to the relatively recent Chinese?

The reason I ask is because I have a vague memory of having read
somewhere about a type of goblin or demon that was supposed to live in
remote places in Tibet, and I know that in parts of SE Asia there are
a variety of "goblins" or maybe "trolls" that live in forests and the
like.

Refers to other people, sometimes vicious tribes of other people there.

I'm afraid I'll need a reference for this too. This interpretation is
certainly possible, but by no means necessary.

Quote:
As
an example of something, the Chinese have a word "ha kwei" and it literally
means a black destructive demon or spirit. But when they use that term,
they are not referring to supernatural beings at all, but to people whom
they don't like very much. But if they wrote about it: "The black demons
greatly disturbed the other students in the university who had come to study
and learn. The students didn't want to hear the noise that was being made by
the black demons." 20th century account. Not supernatural at all, but it
would sound like it. Do 20th century Chinese believe in demons? No.

Likewise, most modern English speakers don't believe in the literal
existence of trolls, demons or goblins, and yet these words are
occasionally used depreciatively toward other people. This is not
relevant to their usage even quite recently as referring to
supernatural creatures assumed to have a literal existence.

Quote:

t their "gods" and they did tell me that their "gods"
were actual people and I did make the analogy then and there about the
Chinese "gods" and Western saints... but I can't use hearsay on a
sci.* group, can I?

In *this* newsgroup? <g> But here's the thing: is it possible that
there is a body of mythology that has been lost since Christianity
dominated Europe during the Dark Ages in which it would have been
clear that Odin, Zeus and other European gods were based on real
people? How would we go about eliminating this possibility?

Didn't Waddell write something about a man named "Dur" claiming that it is
Thor?

Yes. He associates a Sumerian king Dur with both Arthur and Thor, and
called an artifact that was found in Ekur the holy grail. But
Waddell's diffusionist ideas have since been discarded in light of
actual archaeological evidence that suggests that perhaps the Norse
and the British aren't really descended from the kings of ancient
Sumeria.

Quote:

mythologies - for example, the Tuatha da Dannan of Ireland and their
battles with the Formians is said by some to be suggestive of the
"invasion" of Britain by farming peoples and their displacement of the
prior H/G population.

Icelandic sagas that describe the deeds of the gods are not so very
different from those describing the deeds of real people - if the
Icelandic skalds who kept them intact long enough for them to be
transcribed in this century hadn't been around, would we be able to
tell the difference?

Was Perseus real, even if the medusa wasn't? Is the medusa pure
fabrication, or representative of something?

For some information on who Medusa may have been, please see
http://www.geocities.com/go_darkness/god-medusa.html



Quote:
Keep in mind that these people wrote such things in a mythopoetic fashion.
Someone having killed such a creature: his group wiped out their group and

Mythopoetic interpretation is certainly possible; it's also possible
that the supernatural beings described were thought to have a literal
existence. Since we know that until relatively recently supernatural
agents were taken as being a normal part of the world I suggest that
the latter is the more likely interpretation.

Quote:
their ideas. "Mdusa was turned into"... notions of her in the new society
became different. She was evidently a woman from Libya.


No such statement is made on the web page you referenced. Rather,
there is speculation of a link between the Libyan goddess cult, the
Cretan goddess cult and the apparent Gorgon/Athena dichotomy in
classical Greek mythology. As evidence a couple of questionable
sources are all that is provided.

Quote:
How much of the Old
Testament is fantasy, and how much is blurred or embellished history?
Does the story of Cain and Abel recount the acts of real brothers, or
is it a vague recollection of hostilities between H/Gs and early
horticultural villages?

Interesting point . I just happened to look up something after finding a
Bible (Masonic Bible - I hope it's the same thing). Cain was doing
agriculture. Able was hunting or herding cattle (meat). The Jews do say
that none of that can be read literally.

*Modern* people say that the Bible can't be read literally. And yet
not so long ago the Old Testament was used as a *literal* source for
the calculation of the date of Creation. I suspect the modern
assumption that the Bible must be read figuratively is just that:
modern.

Quote:
The problem with that is that the
religion today, 20t...er, 21st century, *is* being read literally by people
who'd eradicate biology and replace it with mythology. I don't see where
that kind of thing happened anywhere else, except perhaps with the Moslem
religion; and on that I'm not even sure.

Interesting idea, but it looks like there's a lot of things which make
it a lot more complicated. You add a new complication yourself below:


Are there other parts of the world where people
believe in things like pixies, elves, dwarves, trolls, angels or
leprechauns? It could be that vague memories passed down over
thousands of years of beings like us but different have made
Europeans
more susceptable to this kind of mythology.

There also are, literally, "little people" such as the African Pygmies.
Since some of them were in Egypt (as pets?) there is no reason to think
that
some of them didn't also find their way into Europe. They'd be little
people, with dark brown skin - strange looking to Europeans back then.

Well, in the Netherlands, according to Dutch people I've met anyway
(more hearsay!), Santa Claus (Saint Nicholas, the patron saint of
children) has "little black people" working for him so the idea of
elves=pigmies makes sense in this particular case anyway.

Maybe so, but ask yourself this: St.Nicolas is thought to have been a
real person who lived in Turkey during the 4th Century, and the story
of his generosity and purported miracles percolated through to western
Europe.

But the entire story of the man, his physical appearance on the sled, all of
that, can be traced to the elder Dionysus in Greece.

? Again, a reference would be nice. This is contrary to my own
(admittedly not extensive) research in the area. Certainly, there
seem to be elements of Dionysus in the story, but the story we have
now contains a number of elements from different cultures. It took
quite a long time for the tale to cross Europe from Turkey after all.

Quote:

Do the "little black people" originate at the same time as
the story reached the Netherlands? Was it tacked onto the story
somewhere else before reaching the Netherlands? Is it an older tale
that has been rolled into the newer St.Nicolas story? Is it a newer
fabrication, like the names of Santa's reindeer in America? Even more
difficult is this question: is the St.Nicolas story directly derived
from the Turkish saint, or has a patina of Christianity been added to
a much older mythology to make it possible to keep the old traditions?

Probably all of that.

Some of these are mutually contradictory, however. The question is:
which elements are which? Not determinable at the present time. That
there *was* a man known as St.Nicolas is reasonably certain. That the
Christmas mythology of St.Nicolas in the Netherlands bears anything of
his but his name is not; and if the original story predated the
tacking of his name on it, it could well be 100% fabrication, and not
based on a real person at all. We can't determine the origin (whether
it was an original fabrication or intended to represent someone in
particular) based on the evidence we have available. We have to take
them as we have them without leaping to conclusions about them.

Quote:


Most of the Chinese "deities" are actually real people, perhaps "made
bigger" or "nicer" over time.

All right then. Are you Chinese? What is your ethnic background? I
assume Nim is your family name.

People shouldn't forget that Buddhism originated in India and that it
was influenced by Hinduism so Chinese people may very well believe in
such gods but those gods didn't originate from ancient Chinese
mythology. As far as I know, Chinese mythological figures were based
on real people. Can we say the same thing about Hercules or Thor or
even Adam and Eve? Hercules, _maybe_, because in Greek mythology he
was nothing but a very strong person (who was supposed to have been
the son of Zeus), but Thor, Adam, Eve, they all strike me as being
purely mythological.

Yes, but if no one told you that the Chinese gods were originally real
people I suspect you would view them as purely mythological as well,
since they don't bear much relation to regular human beings nowadays.

I'm afraid there are too many unanswerable questions when it comes to
determining the exact origin of mythological elements.

Mythopoetic telling of tales back then wouldn't be much different from tales
today. Urban legends? The fish story - Joe in fact struggles with a
fishing line and manages to catch a 5 pound fish. He shares it with his
poor neighbors who have nothing to eat. Days later, it's a 15 pound fish
that he shared with more people. Eventually, Joe struggled with a great
white shark and *fed the entire village*. Put that in writing. The
language is long lost and people have to guess at what the words actually
mean; next it's translated into many languages from the guessings.
Translation: Joe struggled with a great sea monster and fed all the
villagers... to it.

If in a future time, if technology is long gone, and people found print outs
of posts - they'd get a clear idea that trolls used this strange thing
called the internet. Not a joke: you have to know what the word means in
the context of the times, to the people using the word. Obviously, no one
means a literal troll from mythology when they say that. There were no
"wriggling worms" living north of the Chinese who referred to these Altaic
people as that. They were people. For all we know, Holdre may have been a
family name - and the members of the family might have been the equivalent
of the Crips and Bloods of today. Therefore, a "Holdre" (hol-dray) is a
wicked destructive creature. What is "a Hitler?" It's clear what that
means if anyone says it about someone - but it's based on the actual name of
one man. That is how mythopoetic stuff works.

I agree that mythopoetic readings of mythology are possible, but my
point is that they are not certain. Any degree of fabrication from
none to complete is possible for the origins of these tales. In China
we're quite lucky to find a long and relatively complete documentation
which allows us to link real persons with their current mythological
renderings. No such record exists in most parts of the world, and so
speculation as to whether supernatural beings were intended to
represent someone in particular is useless.

Quote:

I doubt the
simple kind of "the little people in western European mythology are a
racial memory of the Neanderthals they were displaced" proposition is
supportable. Even the Tuatha cycle of myths, which are probably much
more recent than the kinds of mythological beliefs you're talking
about, are basically relegated to "hmm. *Could* be..." status.

On the other hand, rest assured that you wouldn't be the first to have
this thought.<g> It's just that it can never be more than speculation,
so you don't see it in print.

Open speculation is good since it might give someone the idea to try to
trace the origins of such things, go digging, and find a city buried
somewhere.

Provisionally agreed.
--
Kevyn Winkless kevyn at the-winkless.net

"The moon will shine upon this house once more.
Do not look at the clouds which now conceal it."
- taken from the Tale of Genji by Murasaki Shikibu
 
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:36 am