| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Medicine - Vision Forum » Suggestions for progressive lenses?
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Sherman |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I've been wearing Essilor Natural lenses for about six years now,
and they seem to work ok. I guess they are considered "dark ages"
lenses now since I understand there are higher-tech, and
higher-priced, lenses made these days. I think I paid $160 for the
Essilors three years ago.
I'd like to stay near that price range if possible, but wondered if
there are alternative brands that everybody likes better, or
provides better value for the money.
If it matters, my prescription is -5.50/-4.75, with +2.25 add for
reading, and the frames are Safilo Elasta #7027, size 50-20, and I
measure them at 38 mm in height.
For concentrated, sustained work, I have separate single-vision
glasses for computer and for reading.
Incidentally, I've become .5D less nearsighted in three years. Well,
in fact I became more nearsighted with time until I reached
-7.50/-6.50 at age 46, and have been going back the other direction
for the last 15 years. I'm told that will slow down and stop at
some point.
Anyway, what does everybody like for moderate-priced progressives? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Robert Martellaro |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:45:20 -0500, Sherman <noone@home.com> wrote:
Quote: I've been wearing Essilor Natural lenses for about six years now,
and they seem to work ok. I guess they are considered "dark ages"
lenses now since I understand there are higher-tech, and
higher-priced, lenses made these days. I think I paid $160 for the
Essilors three years ago.
I'd like to stay near that price range if possible, but wondered if
there are alternative brands that everybody likes better,
Hoya's ID and Zeiss's Individual are, IMO, the best PALs in the US market.
$500-$600 and includes the AR coat.
Quote: or provides better value for the money.
There are some older designs (Super No-line, Vip) that would be less expensive
and provide a generous distance zone that seems to be best for your situation;
separate glasses for close tasks. The near zone boundaries will be much more
obvious, although your brain, given time, will probably adapt.
Quote: If it matters, my prescription is -5.50/-4.75, with +2.25 add for
reading, and the frames are Safilo Elasta #7027, size 50-20, and I
measure them at 38 mm in height.
Sure it matters. Your optician should be the one to sort this out for you. Get a
new frame though; they start breaking on average after about 4 to five years of
full time wear. Your present glasses would be reasonably good spares.
Quote: For concentrated, sustained work, I have separate single-vision
glasses for computer and for reading.
Incidentally, I've become .5D less nearsighted in three years. Well,
in fact I became more nearsighted with time until I reached
-7.50/-6.50 at age 46, and have been going back the other direction
for the last 15 years. I'm told that will slow down and stop at
some point.
Not uncommon. Good thing you stayed away from refractive surgery!
Quote: Anyway, what does everybody like for moderate-priced progressives?
It depends on many factors, but in general, lenses with large distance zones
might be best for your needs. Examples are Genesis, Gradal Top, ECP, Percepta,
etc. This should be discussed in detail with your optician.
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
Wauwatosa Wi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:32 pm
|
|