I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz, has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

On May 23, 12:54 pm, l...@it.snow wrote:
I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz, has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

Well, people have been profiting off of idiots like you since the
beginning of time. I'd say be safe and buy both.

On 23 May 2007 13:59:15 -0700, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 23, 12:54 pm, l...@it.snow wrote:
I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz, has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

Well, people have been profiting off of idiots like you since the
beginning of time. I'd say be safe and buy both.

I had hoped for a more intelligent and reasoned response from
sci.physics, rather than just a bunch of comedians.

In message <63na53hqgln25iv00nkft8sadj1huj552g@4ax.com>, let@it.snow writes
snip

I had hoped for a more intelligent and reasoned response from
sci.physics, rather than just a bunch of comedians.


OK then. Physics is a quantitative science. You ask "does it make any
difference in practice?" without any indication of what is supposed to
differ, or what "practice" consists of.

Before your question can be answered, you need to establish why you
think there is a problem, what the problem is, and why these products
might be a potential solution. Then you need to define a quantitative
measure of the problem, and what the value of that quantity would have
to be for a solution.

*Then* you can ask whether your proposal actually solves the problem.

On 23 May 2007 13:59:15 -0700, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 23, 12:54 pm, l...@it.snow wrote:
I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz, has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

Well, people have been profiting off of idiots like you since the
beginning of time. I'd say be safe and buy both.

I had hoped for a more intelligent and reasoned response from
sci.physics, rather than just a bunch of comedians.

On 23 May 2007 13:59:15 -0700, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:



On May 23, 12:54 pm, l...@it.snow wrote:
I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz, has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

Well, people have been profiting off of idiots like you since the
beginning of time. I'd say be safe and buy both.

I had hoped for a more intelligent and reasoned response from
sci.physics, rather than just a bunch of comedians.

On May 24, 2:37 am, l...@it.snow wrote:
On 23 May 2007 13:59:15 -0700, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:



On May 23, 12:54 pm, l...@it.snow wrote:
I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz, has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

Well, people have been profiting off of idiots like you since the
beginning of time. I'd say be safe and buy both.

I had hoped for a more intelligent and reasoned response from
sci.physics, rather than just a bunch of comedians.

...and you are one of the typical idiots who buys into the nonsensical
notion that low energy EM radiation can hurt you. Then you come on
here, asking which snake oil product would work best.

I can sell you a magic rock that will prevent wifi from hurting you.
Want to check it out?

"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180038399.581970.324320@x18g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 2:37 am, l...@it.snow wrote:
On 23 May 2007 13:59:15 -0700, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:



On May 23, 12:54 pm, l...@it.snow wrote:
I am considering electromagnetic shielding for a human being, I live
in the UK. The options are;

http://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/military_emh_products.htm
"Deployable Shielding" made of Nora Dell fabric, which claims
performance of 80dB, and

http://www.ets-lindgren.com/
which provides panels with much higher shielding of 120dB.

Which should I choose, and does it make any difference in practice?
The Lindgren is twice the cost of the Nora Dell. I am merely trying
to
shield against microwave radiation from 500 MHz up to about 10GHz,
has
anyone used either product and what are your comments on them?

Well, people have been profiting off of idiots like you since the
beginning of time. I'd say be safe and buy both.

I had hoped for a more intelligent and reasoned response from
sci.physics, rather than just a bunch of comedians.

...and you are one of the typical idiots who buys into the nonsensical
notion that low energy EM radiation can hurt you. Then you come on
here, asking which snake oil product would work best.

I can sell you a magic rock that will prevent wifi from hurting you.
Want to check it out?


and i have a bmfh that properly applied to a wifi access point will
provide 100% protection from it's radiation!
------

and i have a bmfh that properly applied to a wifi access point will provide
100% protection from it's radiation!

its

If you're auditioning for Monty Python, it's too late. Michael Palin got