Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Math - Symbolic Forum  »  Powerful NIntegrate
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
dimitris
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:36 am
Guest
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NIntegrateOverview.html

Dimitris
dimitris
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:48 am
Guest
My enthusiasm about Mathematica 6 continues.
I have spent the last two hours examing the Documentation of
NIntegrate.

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NIntegrateOverview.html

Quantum steps has taken in all fields!

>From documentation to strategies/tips/options/algorithms!
Nasser Abbasi
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:40 am
Guest
"dimitris" <dimmechan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178196482.440785.321170@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
My enthusiasm about Mathematica 6 continues.
I have spent the last two hours examing the Documentation of
NIntegrate.

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NIntegrateOverview.html

Quantum steps has taken in all fields!

From documentation to strategies/tips/options/algorithms!


hi Dimitris;

Do you know how to get the same help system in 5.2 to show up in 6.0? I
posted this below to Mathematica newsgroup (but it takes days to get an
answer there)

"When I click on help in Mathematica 6, the familiar help interface is all
gone.

Now one gets a new thing called Documentation center.

I much prefer the old help interface. It was clear, and easy to use. The new
one is hard to use and now one does not know where everything else is. There
is no place to even enter something to search for. One must start by erasing
the string "grid/Mathematica" from the little window at the top to clear it
out. Very annoying. before things where laid out in tabs. Now everything is
a link and one must keep clicking on links all the time.

Is there a way to tell Mathematica 6 to use the old help interface (same
help as in 5.2)? I looked as some options and such, but none there. I wish
they kept the old help system there for those who want to use it.

Nasser"
Dave Seaman
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:57 am
Guest
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:27:31 -0000, Gavin Scott wrote:
Quote:
Nasser Abbasi <nma@12000.org> wrote:
I am running Mathematica 6 right now.

I think I am the first one in the world using the student version Smile they
started selling it few hrs ago. on-line.

I've been told it might be as long as a week before all Premier Service
subscribers have been sent the email with the download info. Bleah.

I just got mine this afternoon.

Quote:
I find the new help system (at least in its web incarnation) to be almost
completely opaque. Rather than a clearly communicated documentation
hierarchy I now have to figure out which of over 80 first-level sections
in seven somewhat arbitrary categories the information I'm looking for
might be found.

Agreed. I'm hoping it will get easier after I have browsed a bit more.

Quote:
It (the new help) is pretty, and probably great if you already know the
answer to your question (but then that's really the first rule of
all symbolic math systems Razz )

What happens to all the applications and add-ons that were based around
the old help subsystem?

I rather like the detailed documentation pages once you find them, but
I really want the old browser interface and hierarchy back I think.

Is "The Mathematica Book" dead at this point? Any narrative about how
to actually use the software seems to be completely gone now. Bleah
again.

Under 5.2 there was a Documentation/English/MainBook with a notebook for
each section. There seems to be no such thing with 6.0. I suspect there
probably isn't even a printed version. However, there is a
Documentation/English/System/ReferencePages that probably contains much
of the same information. It's just arranged differently.


--
Dave Seaman
Oral Arguments in Mumia Abu-Jamal Case to be heard May 17
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
<http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/>
Nasser Abbasi
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:37 am
Guest
"Nasser Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> wrote in message
news:_Cl_h.220875$g24.176758@newsfe12.phx...
Quote:

"dimitris" <dimmechan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178196482.440785.321170@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
My enthusiasm about Mathematica 6 continues.
I have spent the last two hours examing the Documentation of
NIntegrate.

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NIntegrateOverview.html

Quantum steps has taken in all fields!

From documentation to strategies/tips/options/algorithms!



hi Dimitris;

Do you know how to get the same help system in 5.2 to show up in 6.0?

I called the company.

The old help system is all gone. One must use the new "documentation center"
now.

Too bad. The old help was much better.

Nasser
dimitris
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:39 am
Guest
No!

All of my posts regarding Mathematica 6 are based on the online
Documentation.

I don't own it. (Yet!) Sorry for misunderstanding!
I am getting too enthusiastic sometimes!

Do you have a copy of Mathematica 6?
I am interested in the Students Edition but as far as I know
they haven't yet started selling.

Dimitris

Ï/Ç Nasser Abbasi Ýãñáøå:
Quote:
"dimitris" <dimmechan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178196482.440785.321170@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
My enthusiasm about Mathematica 6 continues.
I have spent the last two hours examing the Documentation of
NIntegrate.

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NIntegrateOverview.html

Quantum steps has taken in all fields!

From documentation to strategies/tips/options/algorithms!


hi Dimitris;

Do you know how to get the same help system in 5.2 to show up in 6.0? I
posted this below to Mathematica newsgroup (but it takes days to get an
answer there)

"When I click on help in Mathematica 6, the familiar help interface is all
gone.

Now one gets a new thing called Documentation center.

I much prefer the old help interface. It was clear, and easy to use. The new
one is hard to use and now one does not know where everything else is. There
is no place to even enter something to search for. One must start by erasing
the string "grid/Mathematica" from the little window at the top to clear it
out. Very annoying. before things where laid out in tabs. Now everything is
a link and one must keep clicking on links all the time.

Is there a way to tell Mathematica 6 to use the old help interface (same
help as in 5.2)? I looked as some options and such, but none there. I wish
they kept the old help system there for those who want to use it.

Nasser"
Dave Seaman
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:29 am
Guest
On Thu, 3 May 2007 12:18:58 -0700, Nasser Abbasi wrote:

Quote:
"Dave Seaman" <dseaman@no.such.host> wrote in message
news:f1dbaq$i0b$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:27:31 -0000, Gavin Scott wrote:
Nasser Abbasi <nma@12000.org> wrote:
I am running Mathematica 6 right now.

....

I find the new help system (at least in its web incarnation) to be almost
completely opaque. Rather than a clearly communicated documentation
hierarchy I now have to figure out which of over 80 first-level sections
in seven somewhat arbitrary categories the information I'm looking for
might be found.


Agreed. I'm hoping it will get easier after I have browsed a bit more.


I hate the new Mathematica help system. It is just links after links. One
needs to keep clicking on links, and then go back again. As if one is inside
a browser not a help system.

I have been able to find things by using the search box. My number one
wish is for tabbed browsing.




--
Dave Seaman
Oral Arguments in Mumia Abu-Jamal Case to be heard May 17
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
<http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/>
Nasser Abbasi
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:30 am
Guest
"dimitris" <dimmechan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178203198.164885.289400@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

Quote:
Do you have a copy of Mathematica 6?
I am interested in the Students Edition but as far as I know
they haven't yet started selling.

Dimitris

I am running Mathematica 6 right now.

I think I am the first one in the world using the student version Smile they
started selling it few hrs ago. on-line.

There is a conversion tool to covert old Mathematica notebooks to 6. There
are some compatibility things, which this tools helps to fix automatically.

But when I do save as HTML, nothing happens now. No HTML is generated from
this one specific notebook I have open, and no error. strange. I wanted to
see how good the HTML export now is.

Nasser




Ï/Ç Nasser Abbasi Ýãñáøå:
Quote:
"dimitris" <dimmechan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178196482.440785.321170@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
My enthusiasm about Mathematica 6 continues.
I have spent the last two hours examing the Documentation of
NIntegrate.

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NIntegrateOverview.html

Quantum steps has taken in all fields!

From documentation to strategies/tips/options/algorithms!


hi Dimitris;

Do you know how to get the same help system in 5.2 to show up in 6.0? I
posted this below to Mathematica newsgroup (but it takes days to get an
answer there)

"When I click on help in Mathematica 6, the familiar help interface is all
gone.

Now one gets a new thing called Documentation center.

I much prefer the old help interface. It was clear, and easy to use. The
new
one is hard to use and now one does not know where everything else is.
There
is no place to even enter something to search for. One must start by
erasing
the string "grid/Mathematica" from the little window at the top to clear
it
out. Very annoying. before things where laid out in tabs. Now everything
is
a link and one must keep clicking on links all the time.

Is there a way to tell Mathematica 6 to use the old help interface (same
help as in 5.2)? I looked as some options and such, but none there. I wish
they kept the old help system there for those who want to use it.

Nasser"
Gavin Scott
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Guest
Nasser Abbasi <nma@12000.org> wrote:
Quote:
I am running Mathematica 6 right now.

I think I am the first one in the world using the student version Smile they
started selling it few hrs ago. on-line.

I've been told it might be as long as a week before all Premier Service
subscribers have been sent the email with the download info. Bleah.

I find the new help system (at least in its web incarnation) to be almost
completely opaque. Rather than a clearly communicated documentation
hierarchy I now have to figure out which of over 80 first-level sections
in seven somewhat arbitrary categories the information I'm looking for
might be found.

It (the new help) is pretty, and probably great if you already know the
answer to your question (but then that's really the first rule of
all symbolic math systems Razz )

What happens to all the applications and add-ons that were based around
the old help subsystem?

I rather like the detailed documentation pages once you find them, but
I really want the old browser interface and hierarchy back I think.

Is "The Mathematica Book" dead at this point? Any narrative about how
to actually use the software seems to be completely gone now. Bleah
again.

G.
Nasser Abbasi
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:18 pm
Guest
"Dave Seaman" <dseaman@no.such.host> wrote in message
news:f1dbaq$i0b$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...
Quote:
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:27:31 -0000, Gavin Scott wrote:
Nasser Abbasi <nma@12000.org> wrote:
I am running Mathematica 6 right now.

.....


Quote:
I find the new help system (at least in its web incarnation) to be almost
completely opaque. Rather than a clearly communicated documentation
hierarchy I now have to figure out which of over 80 first-level sections
in seven somewhat arbitrary categories the information I'm looking for
might be found.


Agreed. I'm hoping it will get easier after I have browsed a bit more.


I hate the new Mathematica help system. It is just links after links. One
needs to keep clicking on links, and then go back again. As if one is inside
a browser not a help system.

I can't understand how the same brilliant engineers would come up with such
a amazing new feature such as Manipulator[] would at the same time destroy a
nice help system that it was. (may be if all keep complaining they will
being the hold help system back)

Any way, for now, we have to live with it. I got a nice reply from a
Mathematica support engineer on this when I submitted a complaint. Here it
is:

"Hello,

Thank you for the email. I understand that the Documentation Center is very
different from the help browser we've all been used to the past 19 years.
The documentation center has been completely rewritten to include new
technology and new features, and there is not a way to have Mathematica 6.0
use the old help browser to view Mathematica 6 documentation. It may take
some time to get used to, but it is actually now much more powerful than the
help browser used to be.

For one, the searches through the search bar now use an advanced search
engine which will actually search the content of all the documentation as
well as other sources and will give you much better results. Information is
now sorted into boxes on the homepage instead of tabs. The Documentation
Center is also now connects with Wolfram data servers to dynamically obtain
and update new content for you as well. Not to mention the documentation is
now much more expansive with many, many more useful examples.

Given some time, I'm sure you will come to appreciate the new features and
power.

Sincerely,"


Quote:
It (the new help) is pretty, and probably great if you already know the
answer to your question (but then that's really the first rule of
all symbolic math systems Razz )

What happens to all the applications and add-ons that were based around
the old help subsystem?

I rather like the detailed documentation pages once you find them, but
I really want the old browser interface and hierarchy back I think.

Is "The Mathematica Book" dead at this point? Any narrative about how
to actually use the software seems to be completely gone now. Bleah
again.


I could not find the Mathematica book in the new help system.

Quote:
Under 5.2 there was a Documentation/English/MainBook with a notebook for
each section. There seems to be no such thing with 6.0.

correct.

Quote:
I suspect there
probably isn't even a printed version. However, there is a
Documentation/English/System/ReferencePages that probably contains much
of the same information. It's just arranged differently.


--
Dave Seaman
Oral Arguments in Mumia Abu-Jamal Case to be heard May 17
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/


Nasser
Gavin Scott
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:13 pm
Guest
Dave Seaman <dseaman@no.such.host> wrote:
Quote:
I have been able to find things by using the search box. My number one
wish is for tabbed browsing.

Some sort of history would be nice, as I find myself getting into loops
as A leads to B then to C then to D which has a link to A, and since A,
B, C, and D all have similar names I'm not always sure whether I've seen
A already.

Each documentation page seems to sit in complete isolation with no context,
so you're at the mercy of whoever chose the "SEE ALSO" links as to
whether you can find your way to where you want to be, or guess that
there might be some "nearby" feature that would be of interest. It
seems to be impossible to simply browse the documentation in any
sort of order.

The "Tutorials" are interesting, yet there seems to be no way to find
out what tutorial documents exist short of having them suggested to you
because you visited a page that links to them.

I have found the search results to be surprisingly useless when looking
for anything in the way of general information. You typically get a
list of low-level function documentaiton pages.

Some searches that I tried included "tutorial", "getting started", and
"unified architecture" which left me thinking that the Mathematica 6
documentation search is almost completely useless.

I cannot imagine a new user being left with only this as their learning
tool for the software. I guess it will sell more "Introduction to
Mathematica" books though.

I've always thought that the documentation browser was one of the best
things in Mathematica. I really liked the way addons could integrate
into it as well.

Oh well.

G.
Nasser Abbasi
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:10 pm
Guest
"Gavin Scott" <gavin@allegro.com> wrote in message
news:133knkqoe90mv7a@news.supernews.com...
Quote:
Dave Seaman <dseaman@no.such.host> wrote:
I have been able to find things by using the search box. My number one
wish is for tabbed browsing.



Quote:
Some sort of history would be nice, as I find myself getting into loops
as A leads to B then to C then to D which has a link to A, and since A,
B, C, and D all have similar names I'm not always sure whether I've seen
A already.

Each documentation page seems to sit in complete isolation with no
context,
so you're at the mercy of whoever chose the "SEE ALSO" links as to
whether you can find your way to where you want to be, or guess that
there might be some "nearby" feature that would be of interest. It
seems to be impossible to simply browse the documentation in any
sort of order.

The "Tutorials" are interesting, yet there seems to be no way to find
out what tutorial documents exist short of having them suggested to you
because you visited a page that links to them.

I have found the search results to be surprisingly useless when looking
for anything in the way of general information. You typically get a
list of low-level function documentaiton pages.

Some searches that I tried included "tutorial", "getting started", and
"unified architecture" which left me thinking that the Mathematica 6
documentation search is almost completely useless.

I cannot imagine a new user being left with only this as their learning
tool for the software. I guess it will sell more "Introduction to
Mathematica" books though.

I've always thought that the documentation browser was one of the best
things in Mathematica. I really liked the way addons could integrate
into it as well.

Oh well.

G.

I think you described the problem with the new Mathematica help pages very
well.

I do not think any usability study went into its design. I suspects that
someone who has lots of expeierience of making HTML pages wrote it, thinking
that making a help system to be a bunch of links to other links is a good
design.

If you still want to see a glimpse of the old help system in Mathematica 6,
it is still there, but only for the add-ons applications. If you click on
the link to the add-ons apps (scroll down the page to see the link), and
then click on a link for one of the add-on apps (if you have one), then the
original help interface will comes up. Because the add-ons apps have to
still use the old help system.

So there are now 2 different looking help interface. One for Mathematica
itself, and the original help system for the add-ons. bad design.

Nasser
SzH
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 11:27 am
Guest
Nasser Abbasi írta:
Quote:

I hate the new Mathematica help system. It is just links after links. One
needs to keep clicking on links, and then go back again. As if one is inside
a browser not a help system.

I don't have version 6, but I browsed the online docs a lot. I can't
believe that the documentation in the real program is the same as the
online docs. Now it is much more difficult to find information than in
the old Help Browser.

Quote:
...
"Hello,

Thank you for the email. I understand that the Documentation Center is very
different from the help browser we've all been used to the past 19 years.
The documentation center has been completely rewritten to include new
technology and new features, and there is not a way to have Mathematica 6..0
use the old help browser to view Mathematica 6 documentation. It may take
some time to get used to, but it is actually now much more powerful than the
help browser used to be.

I'm not surprised that he's saying this. This Google-style crazyness
is the new trend nowadays: Don't organize, use search instead! While
searching is useful for finding emails or for navigating rapidly
expanding wikis (where manual organizing is infeasible), I believe
that a company like WRI should take the time to index and organize the
documentation manually instead of just relying on search.

Quote:
For one, the searches through the search bar now use an advanced search
engine which will actually search the content of all the documentation as
well as other sources and will give you much better results. Information is
now sorted into boxes on the homepage instead of tabs. The Documentation
Center is also now connects with Wolfram data servers to dynamically obtain
and update new content for you as well. Not to mention the documentation is
now much more expansive with many, many more useful examples.

Given some time, I'm sure you will come to appreciate the new features and
power.

Sincerely,"

1. The old documentation had a table of contents. It was logically
broken down to sections and related subsections. You always knew where
you were in the documentation (even in the online version). Searching
cannot replace this.

2. It had a Master Index, compiled by intelligent humans, and not a
computer. The Index even contained words that didn't appear in the
docs, e.g. "grep" took you to FindList. Or if you looked up Packages,
you got a detailed list of links with a brief description of the
context: e.g. "list of loaded packages: see $Packages". This is much
better than a list of links to every occurrence of the word
"Packages".

3. Those boxes on the front page look pretty, but they are much more
difficult to skim through than a well organized table of contents. The
links aren't even vertically aligned.

4. Content: Why did the Mathematica book have to go? First I thought
that it was just broken into separate "tutorials", but then I noticed
that many things are missing, e.g that nice little tutorial on how to
make a simple integrate[] function using pattern matching. Why remove
useful content? One could learn to use Mathematica by reading the
chapters of the book one by one. There are many programs which have a
"getting started guide" in their help systems, but few have an
organized and _readable_ manual. A reference manual with a listing of
all functions is necessary to have, a "fuzzy" collection of linked
together tutorials is useful, but neither can replace a good and
readable book. They just complement it.

The search feature is very nice to have, but it is not a replacement
for old ways of organizing information. Why can't we have *both*?
Dana
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:09 pm
Guest
Oh my god! Just got the program, and you're right.
The Help system is absolutly terrible. There's nothing to read, except
maybe you'll find something after 100 clicks.
What idot came up with this?
What good is the program if you can't use it?

--
Dana

"SzH" <szhorvat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178296031.987711.260580@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

Nasser Abbasi írta:
Quote:

I hate the new Mathematica help system. It is just links after links. One
needs to keep clicking on links, and then go back again. As if one is
inside
a browser not a help system.

I don't have version 6, but I browsed the online docs a lot. I can't
believe that the documentation in the real program is the same as the
online docs. Now it is much more difficult to find information than in
the old Help Browser.

Quote:
...
"Hello,

Thank you for the email. I understand that the Documentation Center is
very
different from the help browser we've all been used to the past 19 years.
The documentation center has been completely rewritten to include new
technology and new features, and there is not a way to have Mathematica
6.0
use the old help browser to view Mathematica 6 documentation. It may take
some time to get used to, but it is actually now much more powerful than
the
help browser used to be.

I'm not surprised that he's saying this. This Google-style crazyness
is the new trend nowadays: Don't organize, use search instead! While
searching is useful for finding emails or for navigating rapidly
expanding wikis (where manual organizing is infeasible), I believe
that a company like WRI should take the time to index and organize the
documentation manually instead of just relying on search.

Quote:
For one, the searches through the search bar now use an advanced search
engine which will actually search the content of all the documentation as
well as other sources and will give you much better results. Information
is
now sorted into boxes on the homepage instead of tabs. The Documentation
Center is also now connects with Wolfram data servers to dynamically
obtain
and update new content for you as well. Not to mention the documentation
is
now much more expansive with many, many more useful examples.

Given some time, I'm sure you will come to appreciate the new features and
power.

Sincerely,"

1. The old documentation had a table of contents. It was logically
broken down to sections and related subsections. You always knew where
you were in the documentation (even in the online version). Searching
cannot replace this.

2. It had a Master Index, compiled by intelligent humans, and not a
computer. The Index even contained words that didn't appear in the
docs, e.g. "grep" took you to FindList. Or if you looked up Packages,
you got a detailed list of links with a brief description of the
context: e.g. "list of loaded packages: see $Packages". This is much
better than a list of links to every occurrence of the word
"Packages".

3. Those boxes on the front page look pretty, but they are much more
difficult to skim through than a well organized table of contents. The
links aren't even vertically aligned.

4. Content: Why did the Mathematica book have to go? First I thought
that it was just broken into separate "tutorials", but then I noticed
that many things are missing, e.g that nice little tutorial on how to
make a simple integrate[] function using pattern matching. Why remove
useful content? One could learn to use Mathematica by reading the
chapters of the book one by one. There are many programs which have a
"getting started guide" in their help systems, but few have an
organized and _readable_ manual. A reference manual with a listing of
all functions is necessary to have, a "fuzzy" collection of linked
together tutorials is useful, but neither can replace a good and
readable book. They just complement it.

The search feature is very nice to have, but it is not a replacement
for old ways of organizing information. Why can't we have *both*?
Gavin Scott
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 6:11 pm
Guest
Gavin Scott <gavin@allegro.com> wrote:
Quote:
I've been told it might be as long as a week before all Premier Service
subscribers have been sent the email with the download info. Bleah.

As a datapoint, my upgrade email arrived this afternoon (while watching
the what's new in 6 web seminar). Download is 454MB and download speed
is good.

The new version looks extremely impressive from their demos and I look
forward to playing with it (after the remaining 27% downloads :-)

The new help still sucks though.

G.
 
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:04 pm