|
Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Posts: 602
Location: Toon Town
|
http://www.philipcoppens.com/starcon.pdf
On Jul 16, 2006, at 7:58 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
That's a good falsification - unless he got info before he died from
someone in the future who had that info later. That is, we must consider
all the electron qubit webs in each brain as nodes in a trans-temporal
network - what PK Dick called VALIS. However, Hal's point is well-taken
that the individual brain alone as a hypothetical retro-causal device is
not sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Precognitive auto-correlation
inside of one brain not enough there must also be telepathic
cross-correlations among the brains.
On Jul 16, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Puthoff@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 7/16/2006 10:39:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Cramer's handshake supplemented by signal nonlocality - in every case
of successful RV the subject learns the details of the target in the
future. This information is sent back in time in a self-consistent
"Novikov" loop. This conjecture is falsifiable, e.g. subject dies
before learning details of target yet the prediction is true.
Could be falsified by Price's RV of Semipalatinsk. Though he got
feedback on his drawing of the crane, he insisted that the site had to
do with development of technology for space travel, concerning which the
intell evaluators unanimously disagreed. He died shortly thereafter.
At the end of the cold war, however, it was found that his claim was
correct.
Of course, you can save your hypothesis by saying that he got feedback
after he died! :-)
Hal |
|
|
