Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Engineering - Lighting Forum  »  LED failure mode
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
m
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:05 pm
Guest
What are the failure modes of high power LEDs?

Do they fail open or shorted when operating temperature is exceeded?

How about a case of a number of them connected in series, and the
current rating is exceeded? Do they fail open, thereby potentially
saving a chain reaction or do they fail shorted?

Thanks,

-Martin
Victor Roberts
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:28 pm
Guest
On 3 Mar 2007 10:05:46 -0800, "m" <martin.usenet@gmail.com>
wrote:

Quote:
What are the failure modes of high power LEDs?

They usually don't fail in the traditional sense, but their
light output decreases over time to a point where they are
of little value.

Quote:
Do they fail open or shorted when operating temperature is exceeded?

How about a case of a number of them connected in series, and the
current rating is exceeded? Do they fail open, thereby potentially
saving a chain reaction or do they fail shorted?

Thanks,

-Martin

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Clive Mitchell
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:54 pm
Guest
In message <1172945146.715865.110190@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, m
<martin.usenet@gmail.com> writes
Quote:
What are the failure modes of high power LEDs?

Do they fail open or shorted when operating temperature is exceeded?

How about a case of a number of them connected in series, and the
current rating is exceeded? Do they fail open, thereby potentially
saving a chain reaction or do they fail shorted?

It's probably safest to assume they will fail shorted. Different brands
and their manufacturing processes may have different outcomes.

The thin film nature means that a lot of Gallium Nitride LED failures
seem to be down to failure of the thin film light emitting layer
resulting in a short between the surface electrode and substrate. With
smaller LEDs this has a different characteristic depending on the
current the LED is being run at. If the current is low the LED will
often short out or go dim. If the current is high the film seems to
gradually track and nibble away until the fault "blows clear".

--
Clive Mitchell
http://www.bigclive.com
m
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:40 am
Guest
Quote:
It's probably safest to assume they will fail shorted. Different brands
and their manufacturing processes may have different outcomes.

It sounds like I need to do some destructive testing once we decide on
a device. I am trying to understand what the circuit might have to
survive if an LED fails shorted. Opens are not a big deal as all
current stops flowing. However, a short means that the Vf of that
diode just went to somewhere between 0 and Vf. A linear constant
current driver would have to deal with this. This is, in principle,
not a problem, but there are components that all of a sudden might
need to dissipate a lot more heat. It might pay to try to detect a
shorted LED and simply have the microprocessor shut the thing down.

-Martin
Clive Mitchell
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:31 pm
Guest
In message <1172990433.694531.33520@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>, m
<martin.usenet@gmail.com> writes
Quote:
It sounds like I need to do some destructive testing once we decide on
a device. I am trying to understand what the circuit might have to
survive if an LED fails shorted. Opens are not a big deal as all
current stops flowing. However, a short means that the Vf of that
diode just went to somewhere between 0 and Vf. A linear constant
current driver would have to deal with this. This is, in principle,
not a problem, but there are components that all of a sudden might need
to dissipate a lot more heat. It might pay to try to detect a shorted
LED and simply have the microprocessor shut the thing down.

Much safer to assume the worst case of a short circuit and allow for
that. Even if something as simple as a series resistor was being used
then a thermal fuse rated to trip if the resistor suddenly began to
dissipate a lot more power than was safe to sustain would be better than
nothing.

I'd avoid the "complete shutdown" scenario. In many instances a couple
of LEDs failing would not justify calling the manufacturer, but a
complete shut down of the effect would....

You can bet there are a lot of LED based lighting products in use that
have never even considered the consequences of LED failure.

Here's a rather grim example of one of the first uses of Chinese white
LEDs when they were just getting to grips with the technology. It's a
large white LED digital clock suffering from LED death in a large scale
manner. The company ended up replacing it completely.

http://www.emanator.demon.co.uk/crapleds.jpg

Up to that point the traditional Gallium Arsenide LEDs had been
considered almost indestructible, so it was a real kick in the teeth to
a lot of companies when China invented the worlds first unreliable LEDs.
I too got my fingers burned when I used a load in a TV production.
Fortunately there were enough to hide the ones that failed.

--
Clive Mitchell
http://www.bigclive.com
m
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Guest
Quote:
Much safer to assume the worst case of a short circuit and allow for
that.

The problem is that I'll have 10 to 12 high power LEDs in series. I
wouldn't want to allow for any more than one shorted LED before
calling for a shutdown. The application cannot tolerate even one bad
LED anyway.

Quote:
Here's a rather grim example of one of the first uses of Chinese white
LEDs when they were just getting to grips with the technology.

Which raises another question. My application requires anywhere from
500 to 1000 Seoul Semiconductors P4 LEDs. Not a single failure is
tolerable. I think we need to be very careful about thermal
management in order to ensure that they survive. I've been thinking
about a liquid-cooled heatsink plate for this one.

-M
RHRRC
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:04 pm
Guest
On 4 Mar, 18:57, "m" <martin.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Much safer to assume the worst case of a short circuit and allow for
that.

The problem is that I'll have 10 to 12 high power LEDs in series. I
wouldn't want to allow for any more than one shorted LED before
calling for a shutdown. The application cannot tolerate even one bad
LED anyway.

Here's a rather grim example of one of the first uses of Chinese white
LEDs when they were just getting to grips with the technology.

Which raises another question. My application requires anywhere from
500 to 1000 Seoul Semiconductors P4 LEDs. Not a single failure is
tolerable. I think we need to be very careful about thermal
management in order to ensure that they survive. I've been thinking
about a liquid-cooled heatsink plate for this one.

-M

I think you should have a very serious look at the subject of
electronic devices/eqipment reliability prediction and get some
understanding of the subject before you go any further.

Then come back to the group with any questions you (almost certainly
will) have.
Adam Aglionby
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:22 pm
Guest
On 4 Mar, 18:57, "m" <martin.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Much safer to assume the worst case of a short circuit and allow for
that.

The problem is that I'll have 10 to 12 high power LEDs in series. I
wouldn't want to allow for any more than one shorted LED before
calling for a shutdown. The application cannot tolerate even one bad
LED anyway.

Here's a rather grim example of one of the first uses of Chinese white
LEDs when they were just getting to grips with the technology.

Which raises another question. My application requires anywhere from
500 to 1000 Seoul Semiconductors P4 LEDs. Not a single failure is
tolerable. I think we need to be very careful about thermal
management in order to ensure that they survive. I've been thinking
about a liquid-cooled heatsink plate for this one.

-M

Constant current should be just that, linear is going to pretty big
with 3kW of LEDs.

Seoul P4 uses the Cree EZ Bright dice so pull the data sheets ther,
its laso protected with ESD diodes on the die, my own experience is if
you abuse them enough with over current the internal bond wires melt.

Over temp can be different issue, current hungry and dim, and the ones
in the middle are obviously most at risk. Don`t take Max lumens X No.
of LEDs = unit output

Adam
m
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:12 pm
Guest
Quote:
I think you should have a very serious look at the subject of
electronic devices/eqipment reliability prediction and get some
understanding of the subject before you go any further.

Then come back to the group with any questions you (almost certainly
will) have.- Hide quoted text -

Nice thought. If I had the time, I would. There's a reason we test
fly airplane designs. When all the smoke and bullshit clears out, you
need to find out what happens in the real world. I could model this
thing to death with FEA tools and I'd still have to build it. :-)

We've built a rig with 250 of these LEDs already. No failures
whatsoever. That's why I was asking. I don't know how these things
fail. We tried convection and forced-air cooling with good results.
We have a thermistor every 10 LEDs built into the circuit boards.
They are all mounted on metal clad PCB's thermally coupled to a 1/4
aluminum plate with thin fins welded onto the back. It's a pretty
amazing rig to look at (well, you don't really want to, directly at
least). I can't wait to build the 1000+ LED version. The small unit
does not have any protection mechanism whatsoever. I'll design-in
some of this into the new boards.

I'll be sure to let you know if we encounter any reliability problems.

-M
Clive Mitchell
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 am
Guest
In message <1173057740.334294.26490@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>, Adam
Aglionby <ledlight@gmail.com> writes
Quote:
Seoul P4 uses the Cree EZ Bright dice so pull the data sheets ther, its
laso protected with ESD diodes on the die, my own experience is if you
abuse them enough with over current the internal bond wires melt.

At least they are using reputable dice and have that ESD protection.
The thin film technology has been plagued by electrostatic damage in
cheaper LEDs.

--
Clive Mitchell
http://www.bigclive.com
Clive Mitchell
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 am
Guest
In message <1173060731.593859.115420@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, m
<martin.usenet@gmail.com> writes
Quote:
We've built a rig with 250 of these LEDs already. No failures
whatsoever. That's why I was asking. I don't know how these things
fail. We tried convection and forced-air cooling with good results. We
have a thermistor every 10 LEDs built into the circuit boards. They are
all mounted on metal clad PCB's thermally coupled to a 1/4 aluminum
plate with thin fins welded onto the back. It's a pretty amazing rig
to look at (well, you don't really want to, directly at least). I
can't wait to build the 1000+ LED version. The small unit does not
have any protection mechanism whatsoever. I'll design-in some of this
into the new boards.

It sounds like a pretty robust design so far.

Are the power supplies for the LEDs switch-mode current regulators?

--
Clive Mitchell
http://www.bigclive.com
m
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:36 am
Guest
Quote:
Are the power supplies for the LEDs switch-mode current regulators?

The bulk AC to DC supplies are 48VDC SMPS closed frame units. The
LEDs are driven by custom linear current regulators driving about a
dozen LEDs each.

Overall efficiency might be about 90% for the AC to DC SMPS and 95%
for our custom LED driver, for a total of 85.5% from AC to LED. We
could improve upon the efficiency of the linear LED driver circuit,
but it would require much tighter tolerances for all system
components. I'm not sure that this is worth considering once you take
into account component tolerances, thermal range as well as needing
some headroom to deal with possible failure modes. Like a lot about
this field, there's a lot to be learned.

-M
Clive Mitchell
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:04 am
Guest
In message <1173069373.725737.78440@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, m
<martin.usenet@gmail.com> writes
Quote:
Overall efficiency might be about 90% for the AC to DC SMPS and 95% for
our custom LED driver, for a total of 85.5% from AC to LED. We could
improve upon the efficiency of the linear LED driver circuit, but it
would require much tighter tolerances for all system components. I'm
not sure that this is worth considering once you take into account
component tolerances, thermal range as well as needing some headroom to
with possible failure modes. Like a lot about this field, there's a
lot to be learned.

Many of the commercial series regulators work on the switching current
control arrangement since it means very low dissipation and allows for
various string voltages.

--
Clive Mitchell
http://www.bigclive.com
RHRRC
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:26 pm
Guest
On 4 Mar, 00:28, Victor Roberts <x...@lighting-research.com> wrote:
Quote:
On 3 Mar 2007 10:05:46 -0800, "m" <martin.use...@gmail.com
wrote:

What are the failure modes of high power LEDs?

They usually don't fail in the traditional sense, but their
light output decreases over time to a point where they are
of little value.

"They usually don't fail in the traditional sense"?

Wouln't it be nice if that were true.

Do you mean that as well as failing in the traditional sense they have
an extra failure mode over other discrete semiconductors in that they
also fade away.

<snip>
Quote:

-Martin

--
Vic Robertshttp://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
RHRRC
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:54 pm
Guest
On 5 Mar, 02:12, "m" <martin.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
I think you should have a very serious look at the subject of
electronic devices/eqipment reliability prediction and get some
understanding of the subject before you go any further.

Then come back to the group with any questions you (almost certainly
will) have.- Hide quoted text -

Nice thought. If I had the time, I would. There's a reason we test
fly airplane designs. When all the smoke and bullshit clears out, you
need to find out what happens in the real world. I could model this
thing to death with FEA tools and I'd still have to build it. :-)

We've built a rig with 250 of these LEDs already. No failures
whatsoever. That's why I was asking. I don't know how these things
fail.
snip


have a look at an old Agilent (now Avago) note "Application Brief
I-004" and have a serious read of these led-specific failure
mechanisms and note that these do not include other of the basic
semiconductor technology relevant failure mechanisms.


It may give you the beginnings of an insight into why building a rig
with 250 leds with no idea of what you are testing for is of limited
use on its own.
It will be of some use if it does represent a production product and
you measure the junction temp reasonably accurately.
(With such leds I would imagine that you will have to switch supplies
and measure Vf's within a mSec or so to get decent junction
temperature figures).

You willhave to dig for relevant data on the P4's. I suspect much will
not be available and you will have to make a judgement based on the
experience of others (always unsatisfactory).
Remember, for example, MIL217F is largely based on experience gained
(albeit rather long in the tooth nowadays).

Good luck with the project
 
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:39 am