Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Math - Symbolic Forum  »  Code generation
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:13 pm
I am trying to develop a code for the use of dummy suffix notation
within maple to ultimately solve high order perturbation equations
from an initial energy identity. The differentiation only uses chain
rule but the vast amount of terms involved mean that this notation
would make the solving of thos problem much much easier!! does anyone
have any hints or ideas on how i would go about this? Many thanks.
Chris
Robert Israel
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:23 pm
Guest
en2ccs@bath.ac.uk writes:

Quote:
I am trying to develop a code for the use of dummy suffix notation
within maple to ultimately solve high order perturbation equations
from an initial energy identity. The differentiation only uses chain
rule but the vast amount of terms involved mean that this notation
would make the solving of thos problem much much easier!! does anyone
have any hints or ideas on how i would go about this? Many thanks.
Chris

If you mean that you want e.g. diff(F(x,y,z),x) to be written as F_x,
see the PDEtools functions declare and diff_table.
--
Robert Israel israel@math.MyUniversitysInitials.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
Guest
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:53 am
On Feb 19, 7:23 pm, Robert Israel
<isr...@math.MyUniversitysInitials.ca> wrote:
Quote:
en2...@bath.ac.uk writes:
I am trying to develop a code for the use of dummy suffix notation
within maple to ultimately solve high order perturbation equations
from an initial energy identity. The differentiation only uses chain
rule but the vast amount of terms involved mean that this notation
would make the solving of thos problem much much easier!! does anyone
have any hints or ideas on how i would go about this? Many thanks.
Chris

If you mean that you want e.g. diff(F(x,y,z),x) to be written as F_x,
see the PDEtools functions declare and diff_table.
--
Robert Israel isr...@math.MyUniversitysInitials.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada

What i mean is that the suffix notation W[ij]Q[k] is actually (dWij/
dq1)*(dq1/dq1)+(dWij/dq2)*(dq2/dq1)+ -------> +(dWij/dqn)*(dqn/dq1)
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:05 am