|
Science Forum Index » Geology - Earthquakes Forum » US Central West Coast in for a rocky ride in 2007
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Steve |
 Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob Officer |
| Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 17 Jan 2007 17:57:00 -0800, in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Steve"
<philhendrie@aol.com> wrote:
If this is as accurate as your last attempt, that means the west
coast is the safest place in the world.
Why don't you return to alt.astrology and explain to everyone how you
proved that astrology is 100% accurate?
--
Ak'toh'di |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Bob Officer wrote:
Quote: If this is as accurate as your last attempt, that means the west
coast is the safest place in the world.
Hi leach.
Quote: Why don't you return to alt.astrology and explain to everyone how you
proved that astrology is 100% accurate?
Again? Trolling is not my thing. But just in case I need trolling
lessons what's your tuition? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| John Krempasky |
| Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Leaving aside the worthless vagueness of the forecast itself, I think you
actually have created the single worst graphical presentation of anything in
the entire history of the internet. Congratulations. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
John Krempasky wrote:
Quote: Leaving aside the worthless vagueness of the forecast itself, I think you
actually have created the single worst graphical presentation of anything in
the entire history of the internet. Congratulations.
I kept it simple because I knew that you would be viewing it John. Lol.
Like stocks, there's not much to plotting seismic charts: for all NG
simpletons, there are two cycles: up and down cycles. When the center
line tilts up, this means I'm forecasting the ground to shake much more
than it would during down cycles. Furthermore, anytime the chart is
approaches the top, it is impossible for any sizable quake to occur.
Furthermore, when the chart trends under the central trendline and deep
below the last peak, it has to return to the trendline and therefore
the sample area (location) is prime for a relatively moderate quake of
which I've called many a quake larger than a 3.0. So many in fact that
it gets boring. So simpletons there you be. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Skywise |
| Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Steve" <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote in
news:1169091102.152293.218930@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com:
Quote:
John Krempasky wrote:
Leaving aside the worthless vagueness of the forecast itself, I think
you actually have created the single worst graphical presentation of
anything in the entire history of the internet. Congratulations.
I kept it simple because I knew that you would be viewing it John. Lol.
If that's simple....
But seriously, it looks like you took a bunch of bits and pieces
of text adn lines and squiggles and just tossed them in a box,
dropped them on paper, and where ever they landed, that's where
you stuck them.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:09 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Skywise wrote:
Quote: But seriously, it looks like you took a bunch of bits and pieces
of text adn lines and squiggles and just tossed them in a box,
dropped them on paper, and where ever they landed, that's where
you stuck them.
Brian
Your etch-a-sketch needs shaking. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:23 am |
|
|
|
|
In article <1169093387.793778.34860@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
Steve <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote:
Quote: Your etch-a-sketch needs shaking.
And you claim you aren't into trolling? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Damon Hill |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
ellis@no.spam () wrote in news:1169094192.100945@no.spam:
Quote: In article <1169093387.793778.34860@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
Steve <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote:
Your etch-a-sketch needs shaking.
And you claim you aren't into trolling?
Give it up and killfile him. You can't pin down
a pinhead.
--Damon |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:52 am |
|
|
|
|
In article <Xns98BBD3A69B079damon161attbicom@216.196.97.131>,
Damon Hill <damon1six1@comcast.comma> wrote:
Quote: Give it up and killfile him. You can't pin down
a pinhead.
Oh, I wasn't planning on actually reading more of his posts  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
ellis@no.spam wrote:
Quote: In article <Xns98BBD3A69B079damon161attbicom@216.196.97.131>,
Damon Hill <damon1six1@comcast.comma> wrote:
Give it up and killfile him. You can't pin down
a pinhead.
Oh, I wasn't planning on actually reading more of his posts
Like we believe you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Click this link:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/37.47.-125.-115_eqs.php
That is the data pool for my short term charts.
Look at the activity lately. There's been a flurry of above average mag
quakes in a very short time frame: a 3.5mag, a 2.6, a 2.5, a 3.7, a
3.0, a 2.8, a 2.9, a 3.0, a 3.0, a 2.6, a 3.3, a 2.8, a 2.6, and last
but not least, 3.8 all within five (5 days).
Good luck,
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:41 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
ellis@no.spam wrote:
Quote: In article <1169093387.793778.34860@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
Steve <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote:
Your etch-a-sketch needs shaking.
And you claim you aren't into trolling?
Yes, but I'm learning. Thanks teacher. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Steve |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Damon Hill wrote:
Quote: ellis@no.spam () wrote in news:1169094192.100945@no.spam:
In article <1169093387.793778.34860@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
Steve <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote:
Your etch-a-sketch needs shaking.
And you claim you aren't into trolling?
Give it up and killfile him. You can't pin down
a pinhead.
--Damon
Keep sipping the kool-aide. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob Officer |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 17 Jan 2007 21:36:02 -0800, in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Steve"
<philhendrie@aol.com> wrote:
Quote: Click this link:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/37.47.-125.-115_eqs.php
That is the data pool for my short term charts.
Look at the activity lately. There's been a flurry of above average mag
quakes in a very short time frame: a 3.5mag, a 2.6, a 2.5, a 3.7, a
3.0, a 2.8, a 2.9, a 3.0, a 3.0, a 2.6, a 3.3, a 2.8, a 2.6, and last
but not least, 3.8 all within five (5 days).
Do you know those are not abnormal for this area?
--
Ak'toh'di |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
