| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Agriculture Forum » Is it ethical to eat animals? OF COURSE
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| Rat & Swan |
 Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 12:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
usual suspect wrote:
a-historical garbage.
Anyone with a basic understanding of history and the period
knows that the Nazi animal welfare measures and attitudes
had no historical connection to, or similarity to, modern AR
views. The only people who try to make a connection are
dishonest and sophistical propagandists. Historians understand
that events must be seen in context, with some understanding
that other times are not the same as our times. Blinkered
non-historians are always trying to ignore this.
We'll play the game if Usual wants, but it is just that -- a
silly game, because Usual and the propagandists he got this
garbage from simply don't comprehend how history works or what
history IS. It's like trying to explain mathematics to monkeys.
Rat
<snip> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jonathan Ball |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 1:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[snip shabby sophistry]
Was working out the [ahem] finer points of your shabby
bullshit about Nazis and "ar" what you chose to do
instead of raising your son? No wonder he hates you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dzogvi Gzboli |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I
Quote:
"Professor" <professor@warehouse.ws> wrote in message
news:bujvlr$3f4$1@pita.alt.net...
Man is the master of animals, we can kill them at will.
Gzboli comments:
You cannot live a day but at the expense of the life of someother
creature. Your immune system murders millions of lives each day;
your every step scrunches millions of creatures. Accept the bounty
of animal food, but do so with reverence for the departed who become
part of you. You will become food for the others soon enough; and
may they pay your remains similar reverence. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| usual suspect |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
degene-Rat wrote:
Quote: usual suspect wrote:
a-historical garbage.
Nonsense. Karen, even your *own* source calls it AR. You're the only one
caught up on semantics.
Quote: Anyone with a basic understanding of history and the period
knows that the Nazi animal welfare measures and attitudes
Appeal to popularity.
Quote: had no historical connection to, or similarity to, modern AR
views. The only people who try to make a connection are
dishonest and sophistical propagandists.
You mean folks like Boria Sax, whom you used as a source?
Quote: Historians understand
that events must be seen in context, with some understanding
that other times are not the same as our times.
You're the one taking things completely out of context.
Quote: Blinkered
non-historians are always trying to ignore this.
Is that what one calls a drop-out history major who, like other things
in her life, did not complete her course work?
Quote: We'll play the game if Usual wants, but it is just that -- a
silly game, because Usual and the propagandists he got this
garbage from simply don't comprehend how history works or what
history IS. It's like trying to explain mathematics to monkeys.
In fairness, monkeys may humor your indulgent attitudes better than I do. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| John 'the Man |
| Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 9:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Once upon a time, our fellow Bob Ward
rambled on about "Re: Is it ethical to eat animals? OF COURSE."
Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
Quote: I've never eaten spotted troll before. Is it anything like spotted
owl?
No, ... It tastes more like a spotted Mark!
Ha, ... Hah, Ha! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:10 am
|
|