| |
 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Jupiter sized spheres of hot gas at 99.9% spol and BB |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| glbrad01 |
 Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Something had been bothering me about those Jupiter sized spheres of hot
gas astronomers found traveling at 99.9% percent the speed of light relative
to the Earth. I finally figured it out with reference to my own model of the
Universe and universal real time zero concept.
The cosmologists have placed the Big Bang on the wrong end of time. It is
at the forward edge of time, "soonest," where Einstein supposedly took his
minds eye trip earlier and Hawking later placed his Grand Central Station of
the Universe with its clock time constant of zero. Both went straight to a
cosmological constant of Big Bang and never realized where they were at.
I've always wandered why there seems to be no high end to the heat
temperature scale, short of what should be Big Bang temperature, or Big
Crunch temperature, one and the same. I was reading Brian Greene's "The
Fabric Of The Cosmos" when I came across his mentioning there is an ever
growing acceptance in the physics community that the Universe [is] infinite
but the Big Bang when it occurred, if it occurred, occurred on that very
scale throughout the infinite Universe all at once.
Reading that, I thought about the recent findings by scientists that seem
as if they might threaten the idea of a Big Bang beginning, if they prove
out, which tickled me greatly since I've never believed in the damn thing in
the first place.
I thought Brian Greene could not possibly be right. If a Big Bang occurs
every where in a spatially infinite Universe it has to occur everywhere in
time as well, all at once, since, at least in my model, space and time are
alternative 4-dimensionalities. Since we wouldn't be here if it did then
where would it be in time if there is no beginning to time--which a
spatially infinite Universe having been around forever most definitely
implies. No beginning to time, a dimension of universal real time zero, or
cosmological constant zero, then becomes primary just as I've pushed here
all along. And there would be the missing high end to the temperature scale.
What is inside the Planck horizon and just how much energy would it take
to break through to whole of whatever is inside it, to every magnitude of a
potential infinity of magnitudes down and in inside that horizon of
magnitude? It's another form of leverage this is, needing to equal or exceed
the energy; and we could not exceed all the energy in the whole of an
infinite Universe to break open that point of all point-singularities to get
through to "soonest" in time. In any case, we'd probably find there that
there is still a "sooner" than "soonest" in existence ("I want it
immediately if not sooner." "Sooner than soonest!" Real time zero
(instantaneous moment (Big Crunch/Big Bang moment? universally present and
constant? to an "infinite Universe"?))).
Brad |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bjoern Feuerbacher |
| Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:29 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
glbrad01 wrote:
[quote:4e32ec298a]Something had been bothering me about those Jupiter sized spheres of hot
gas astronomers found traveling at 99.9% percent the speed of light relative
to the Earth.
[/quote:4e32ec298a]
Err, what on earth are you talking about? Reference, please.
[snip incoherent rant]
Bye,
Bjoern |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Uncle Al |
| Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
glbrad01 wrote:
[quote:19e9243b27]
Something had been bothering me about those Jupiter sized spheres of hot
gas astronomers found traveling at 99.9% percent the speed of light relative
to the Earth. I finally figured it out with reference to my own model of the
Universe and universal real time zero concept.
[snip crap][/quote:19e9243b27]
You are a boring idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| glbrad01 |
| Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:E5aMd.628$89.178@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
[quote:475e145573]
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:420107F2.80856DAF@hate.spam.net...
glbrad01 wrote:
[/quote:475e145573]
(snip)
[quote:475e145573]This demonstrates that one of the two parties involved really IS
psychotic, and believe me, I've tested the theory, Schwartz WILL have the
last word.
Androcles.
[/quote:475e145573]
I've been long aware of what "Uncle Al" must be, Androcles. He doesn't own
the universe nor does he own cosmological speculation. He does have peers
for foulness and Hitlerianism, though no superiors.
Makes no difference what he says though. When the most noted physicists
talk about solar systematic size particle accelerators being needed just to
try to make it to the one horizon we are talking universe class to go much
farther. I've read that before as well. What I was referring to was the fact
that a universe class particle accelerator would be Big Bang class and
probably eternal as well as universal. To Uncle Al such physicist writers as
Hawking and Greene must also be boring idiots for writing the things they do
and for their own speculations. Once more, "Great spirits have always
encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds..." (Albert Einstein).
What is the temperature at the distant Planck limit? What would be the
masses inside (beyond) that event horizon? The densities? The energies? The
heat?
Brad |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:26 pm
|
|