| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Military Forum » Alleged USAF/DIA UFO Metric Engineering Meeting in DC
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Jack Sarfatti |
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
I am making breakthroughs in real stuff dealing with real observations
(Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat
rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field
equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced
/\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and
weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff
was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high
officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Doc Savage wrote:
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time,
sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to
gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational
radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently
doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on
"Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS,
Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at
Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie
to poor you! 
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to
Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able
to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916.
That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper
showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is
not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with
a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp,
wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE
et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we
know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you
don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with
witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of
the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These
people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something
that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something
seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's
General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper
"Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have
written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first
time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These
serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep
stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false
hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you
think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are
waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at
the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come
Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the
Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of
applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV
seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim
that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What
you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are
talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that
dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To
the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story
with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The
Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static
spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric
toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations
(2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild
coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without
PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR.  Matt Visser
agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks
to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on
Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal
coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the
"exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism
(essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the
"time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no
time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology
protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past
for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless
infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect
empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS
paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse
pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual
exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse
pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to
(energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal
coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to
4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero
point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the
phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of
small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation
micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large
entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of
the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM
drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion
quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding
energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this
basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy
built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave
vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one
at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA
Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable
pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in
the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration
back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum
hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU
from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter
Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the
rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's
formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac
Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:46 am
|
|