|
Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » which starsign is the most intelligent?
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Joshua |
 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 10:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
which starsign do you guys think is the most intelligent / wise?? I
think it's Virgo or Aquarius. I've been arguing about this with my
girlfriend for years now, so any pointers???
thanx, josh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Keera Ann Fox |
| Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Joshua <daflecta@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: which starsign do you guys think is the most intelligent / wise?? I
think it's Virgo or Aquarius.
Einstein was a Pisces. Ghandi was a Libran.
Quote: I've been arguing about this with my
girlfriend for years now, so any pointers???
The only thing you can tell with astrology is amount of curiosity (some
signs want to know how things work more than other signs do) and how the
person processes information and experience.
Much of what is conceived as stupidity ("she just doesn't get it!") is
actually an inability to communicate so that the other one understands
("he doesn't explain it well"). That has much to do with Mercury.
Wisdom comes with experience and understanding. For those, look to the
planets Jupiter and Saturn and the outer planets. Not everybody "gets"
these planets. Jupiter is often a moral guide and a view of people at
large (like how you see foreigners). Saturn is how you process life's
experience (and the pain). The outer planets (Uranus, Neptune and Pluto)
are different ways for you to explore the message of Jupiter and Saturn,
without the comfort or guidance of tradition; i.e. you have to look
elsewhere, and often within.
Finally, an individual's own horoscope can show if they are using their
head or not, based on where and how the planets are placed in that
person's chart.
--
******* Keera in Norway ********
** Think big. Shrink to fit. ***
* http://home.online.no/~kafox *
thinkbig_shrinktofit @ yahoo.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Edmond Wollmann |
| Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 9:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Joshua wrote:
Quote:
which starsign do you guys think is the most intelligent / wise?? I
think it's Virgo or Aquarius. I've been arguing about this with my
girlfriend for years now, so any pointers???
thanx, josh
We cannot make such subjective value judgments based on sunsigns.
Thank you for your interest in astrology and this group.
If you are willing to supply accurate and exact information I am sure
some astrologers may be willing to help if they can. Astrology is NOT
what is generally accepted and spun by newspapers and the media etc.
based only on sunsigns, anymore than "Ask Ann Landers" or some newpaper
advice column is depth psychology, counseling or professional therapy.
Would you base important life decisions on that?
To make sweeping generalizations with sun signs is simplistic and
irresponsible. The study of astrology is complex and must be learned
like any other discipline. It must be treated with the respect it
deserves as a powerful tool of understanding. Tools are always dependent
upon the astuteness of the craftsman and their application abilities.
There is one way that sun signs can be used in a positive way. That is
by having the horoscope done properly and accurately and then placing
the sun on the ascendant with its degree and sign as the ascendant. This
is the solar chart. The solar chart can then be read just like a natal
and is very revealing as far as implications and interpretations. In
this way the solar chart can be used in conjunction with the natal house
arrangement and adds powerful information as far as transits etc. as
well once an accurate horoscope has been obtained.
5.393707075 x 10 58th- Is greater than the population of a million
earths, but the smallest possible number of astrological factor
combinations. The sun sign is simply ONE of those factors. True
astrology defines the specificity of identity through delineation of a
myriad of factors, and ALL of these factors reflect the identity.
Psychodynamic functioning is reflected through astrological signature
and leads us to an understanding of the psyche and the beliefs of the
identity. These beliefs are what is responsible for the created
experiential reality and is reflected in the mirror of mind-matter.
Therefore there are as many different vibrations as people and
astrological possibilities as well. Even twins can express different
levels of the same chart, so there is no fixed pattern of anything that
makes anyone set as a such and such.
In the same way that a doctor would not make such irresponsible
diagnoses based on a persons hair color-so in the same way astrology
demands full and cogent renderings based on complete information.
At least with a solar chart we still take the natal positions in
consideration for a more complete view of the person in question. The
astrologer must be diverse and open to viewing the subject in many ways.
If astrology is to be treated as a serious subject and valuable
paradigm, we must present it in a coherent and comprehensive way.
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/faqs.htm
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2003 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Articles http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/TOC.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Spāmster |
| Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 10:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Quote: Thank you for your interest in astrology and this group.
Yawn. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 11:28 pm |
|
|
|
|
In article <3FFA1C1C.C3D@earthlink.net>,
Convicted criminal Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone@earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: We cannot make such subjective value judgments based on sunsigns.
Sure you can, silly kook. They don't mean anything because astrology
doesn't work but there is nothing to stop you from making them.
Are you really that stupid? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| digger |
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 2:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone@earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: 5.393707075 x 10 58th- Is greater than the population of a million
earths, but the smallest possible number of astrological factor
combinations.
So, now there are BFN combinations of factors, and not BFN
factors. This is progress, Edie. At this rate, sometime during
the Age of Saggitarius, you should be able to explain just how the
BFN was derived.
--
dr. digger, PMAFA
Founder of alt.paranormal
http://www.smbtech.com/ed |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| House Widdershins |
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 02:23:51 GMT, Edmond Wollmann
<arcturianone@earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: Joshua wrote:
which starsign do you guys think is the most intelligent / wise?? I
think it's Virgo or Aquarius. I've been arguing about this with my
girlfriend for years now, so any pointers???
thanx, josh
We cannot make such subjective value judgments based on sunsigns.
Thank you for your interest in astrology and this group.
If you are willing t
snip
Canned response. Wolmann;s law invoked. You lose
again, Eddieeeeeee.
Widdershins
"I am the most powerful intellectual giant to ever grace usenet."
One of Eddieeeeee's continuing delusions. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dan Baldwin |
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 12:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Quote:
Joshua wrote:
which starsign do you guys think is the most intelligent / wise?? I
think it's Virgo or Aquarius. I've been arguing about this with my
girlfriend for years now, so any pointers???
thanx, josh
We cannot make such subjective value judgments based on sunsigns.
Why not? Its just as valid as any other type of astrology - i.e. not at
all.
<screed flushed>
--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*
"I have always thought that the reason Dinosaurs were so big is because
of the dramatic difference in gravitational strength between that time
period and now" -Edmo the paleontologist
"Christ was just an enlightened person, not unlike me." -Edmo the humble
"I am an authority, and I do not force my views on others like you do."
-Edmo, enemy of Irony Meters all over Usenet
"It's not Latin, clueless wannabe tryhard." -Fucknozzle Junior
discussing the phrase 'Illegimati non carborundum'(sic)
Hail the un-alive |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
