Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Cryptography Forum  »  Streambuddy unbreakable? You bet ;) Happy new year
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Douglas A. Gwyn
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:51 pm
Guest
JT wrote:
Quote:
You are right it is a perfect fake random stream nonedistinguishable
from a perfect random stream.

If that is really true then you wouldn't be able to retrieve
the original plaintext information, at least not without
providing at least as much information through a side channel.

What grounds do you have for that claim? Or is it merely
wishful thinking?
Douglas A. Gwyn
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:51 pm
Guest
JT wrote:
Quote:
You are right it is a perfect fake random stream nonedistinguishable
from a perfect random stream.

If that is really true then you wouldn't be able to retrieve
the original plaintext information, at least not without
providing at least as much information through a side channel.

What grounds do you have for that claim? Or is it merely
wishful thinking?
John E. Hadstate
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:04 pm
Guest
"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote in message
news:3FF5AF85.53DBF6DF@null.net...
Quote:
JT wrote:
You are right it is a perfect fake random stream nonedistinguishable
from a perfect random stream.

If that is really true then you wouldn't be able to retrieve
the original plaintext information, at least not without
providing at least as much information through a side channel.

What grounds do you have for that claim? Or is it merely
wishful thinking?

Consider the source. JT is the entertainer formerly known as "Dabiker". He
is the inventor of the stream cipher called "Black Dahlia" and numerous
others, some of which were broken within minutes of posting.
John E. Hadstate
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:04 pm
Guest
"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote in message
news:3FF5AF85.53DBF6DF@null.net...
Quote:
JT wrote:
You are right it is a perfect fake random stream nonedistinguishable
from a perfect random stream.

If that is really true then you wouldn't be able to retrieve
the original plaintext information, at least not without
providing at least as much information through a side channel.

What grounds do you have for that claim? Or is it merely
wishful thinking?

Consider the source. JT is the entertainer formerly known as "Dabiker". He
is the inventor of the stream cipher called "Black Dahlia" and numerous
others, some of which were broken within minutes of posting.
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:49 pm