 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Science Skeptics Forum » GOD, RELATIVITY & THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS... |
|
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| George Hammond... |
 Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right. It was 3 am in a honky tonk section of Laural
Maryland a block from where George Wallace was shot. The
three punks in the car started blowing their horn. I knew
it was run or pull the K-Bar over my visor and probably kill
one of them in a fight. I jambed it into reverse flooring
the accelerator and spinning the steering wheel. The car
spun into a 180 facing the wrong way on a divided highway. I
gunned it into the oncoming traffic. The three punks in the
sedan followed suit and came after me! That was the day I
discovered the world's first scientific proof of God. I
discovered it while studying in the library of Congress on
Capitol Hill and was on my way home. Needless to say I got
away or I wouldn't be here telling you about it.
The way I discovered it is an interesting story. I'm a
physicist who got interested in psychology research. The
first thing I found out is that modern psychology research
consists mainly of an activity called Factor Analysis. They
use the world's largest computers to extract the
eigenvectors from 100x100 correlation matrices. The
correlations are obtained from psychology tests given to
hundreds of thousands of people world wide.
The upshot of all this is that they have known for
decades that every analysis results in exactly 4
eigenvectors, but being psychologists and not physicists
they have never been able to figure out why or what they
mean or where they come from. Being a physicist I
immediately recognized that the 4x4 matrix is what
physicists call, "curved". I went looking for the cause of
this curvature and soon discovered that it comes from the
3-axis orthogonal structure of the body, in particular the
3-axis cleavage of the brain. That accounted for 3 of the
eigenvectors, they were "space" related. The 4th one was IQ
which is mental speed and is time related. The curvature of
this matrix was actually caused by brain growth, in
particular the well known Secular Trend in human growth.
What I had discovered is that all of psychology is explained
by a curvature of subjective spacetime.... a CURVATURE OF
REALITY! . I was amazed at how simple this discovery was...
apparently I must have been the first physicist in history
to ever take psychology seriously. Little did I know how
momentous this discovery actually was!
Once the stunning fact is discovered that psychology is a
CURVATURE it is not long before one realizes that this
curvature is actually the explaination of "God"... yes, the
God of the Bible. Sure enough, the Secular Trend growth
deficit in the brain causes the "unconscious mind" which is
in fact the God of the Bible. Analysis soon showed that
this discovery explained the following 13 major historical
facts about the phenomenon of God:
1. There physically exists an "invisible world" known as
"Heaven" which is similar to Earth but is a paradise.
2. God is an "invisible man" who lives there and is all
powerful and rules the actual (visible) world from
there.
3. This God can effect miracles which transcend
the (known) laws of Physics.
4. Jesus said "God is a spirit" Jn 4:24
5. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
(many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
6. Christianity predicts the world is transforming itself
into Heaven and will actually complete this at a
date known as "Kingdom Come"... or the "end of the
world".
7. There is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
8. Jesus was the physical "incarnation of God"
9. The Cross for some reason is the central symbol of
(Western) Religion.
10. For some reason our main canonical text is written
in 4 identical versions known as the "4-Gospel Canon".
11. God "created the world" only a matter of "thousands"
of years ago (Genesis) not "billions" of years ago
(Big Bang) as Science believes.
12. God created man "in his own image".
13. There is a "Trinity of God", functionally or
operationally speaking.
the complete detailed explanation of all 13 of these
leading items PROVES without any doubt that a curvature of
subjective reality (the reality we see) is caused by the
brain growth deficit and explains the entire phenomenon of
God:
GO GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
Naturally I have published all of this in the peer
reviewed literature in order to protect my priorities, and I
am currently writing a book. My peer published papers are
prominantly posted on my website for your reading
convenience (url in signature file below).
Meanwhile, the discovery of the world's first scientific
proof of God is my calling card to history.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror sites
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
======================================= |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Lits O'Hate... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 6, 8:02 am, George Hammond <Nowhe... at (no spam) notspam.net> wrote:
[quote]My peer published papers are
prominantly posted on my website for your reading
convenience
[/quote]
Wow. You can even make spelling errors using speech
recognition software. Very impressive, George!
--
"God's feet are 16" long, and his IQ is 333." -- George Hammond |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Madge... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ahmed Ouahi, Architect... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nicko... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 6, 7:02 am, George Hammond <Nowhe... at (no spam) notspam.net> wrote:
[quote]Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
[/quote]
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
Or maybe it's just a matter of frame of reference.
--
YOP... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Otto Bahn... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Nicko" <nervous.nick at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
[quote]WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
[/quote]
<You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
<like, sooo cool!
<
<Or maybe it's just a matter of frame of reference.
I saw a Law & Order where they framed a reference.
--oTTo-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Casanova... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <ei at (no spam) eio.com>:
[quote]"Nicko" <nervous.nick at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
[/quote]
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
[quote]Or maybe it's just a matter of frame of reference.
I saw a Law & Order where they framed a reference.
[/quote]
I think I saw that one... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Otto Bahn... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Bob Casanova" <nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote
[quote]WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
[/quote]
It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Otto!"
And he did.
--oTTo-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Don Stockbauer... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 9, 5:54 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe... at (no spam) notspam.net> wrote:
[quote]On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
nos... at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <e... at (no spam) eio.com>:
"Nicko" <nervous.n... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
[Hammond]
There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
Simple minded dimwit!
=======================================> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
[/quote]
But you missed the REAL proof of God:
"God and the Universe are identical memes." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| George Hammond... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
<nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
[quote]On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <ei at (no spam) eio.com>:
"Nicko" <nervous.nick at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
[Hammond][/quote]
There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
Simple minded dimwit!
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
======================================= |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bryce Utting... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Otto Bahn <ei at (no spam) eio.com> wrote:
[quote]It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Matt!"
And he did.
[/quote]
IFYPFY.
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
If this is UI for anyone - even TimC - I shall be extremely alarmed.
-- Dan Birchall |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Casanova... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:54:39 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
<Nowhere1 at (no spam) notspam.net>:
[quote]On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <ei at (no spam) eio.com>:
"Nicko" <nervous.nick at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
[Hammond]
There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
[/quote]
What a shame, then, that it wasn't the product of a 'bot at
all, but exactly what it claimed to be. Perhaps you're in
transference mode...?
[quote]Simple minded dimwit!
[/quote]
Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| George Hammond... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:14:24 -0700, Bob Casanova
<nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
[quote]On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:54:39 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
Nowhere1 at (no spam) notspam.net>:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <ei at (no spam) eio.com>:
"Nicko" <nervous.nick at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
[Hammond]
There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
What a shame, then, that it wasn't the product of a 'bot at
all, but exactly what it claimed to be. Perhaps you're in
transference mode...?
[Hammond][/quote]
Great scholars and true intellectuals like myself do not
speak any yuppie language such as "transference mode". We
speak in simple universal poor man's English.
Unlike you, I'm not a phony smart ass! I got the courage
to talk to people, any people, about real and newly
discovered facts. If you want to talk to me you'll have to
get real.
[quote]
Simple minded dimwit!
Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
[Hammond][/quote]
you didn't show anything, this one shows something:
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
And this:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
Unless you can address that in specific terms, in plain
English, you're just a worthless stumblebum with nothing to
say.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
======================================= |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Casanova... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:46:28 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
<Nowhere1 at (no spam) notspam.net>:
[quote]On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:14:24 -0700, Bob Casanova
nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:54:39 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
Nowhere1 at (no spam) notspam.net>:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <ei at (no spam) eio.com>:
"Nicko" <nervous.nick at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
[Hammond]
There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
What a shame, then, that it wasn't the product of a 'bot at
all, but exactly what it claimed to be. Perhaps you're in
transference mode...?
[Hammond]
Great scholars and true intellectuals like myself
[/quote]
You have delusions of adequacy.
[quote]do not
speak any yuppie language such as "transference mode". We
speak in simple universal poor man's English.
Unlike you, I'm not a phony smart ass!
[/quote]
Nope, you're a genuine smartass.
[quote]I got the courage
to talk to people, any people, about real and newly
discovered facts. If you want to talk to me you'll have to
get real.
Simple minded dimwit!
Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
[Hammond]
you didn't show anything, this one shows something:
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
And this:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
Unless you can address that in specific terms, in plain
English, you're just a worthless stumblebum with nothing to
say.
[/quote]
Sorry, but this...
"First, since gravity is real, God is real. Secondly,
tradition tells us that God is "supernatural" and we find
that Relativity explains the supernatural aspect of God.
Relativity is the only physical phenomena which causes a
'supernatural' effect on reality; reality being space and
time itself."
....contains *at least* 3 significant errors.
First, the existence of gravity implies nothing about the
existence of God. Gravity is a function of the curvature of
space-time.
Second, tradition is not evidence for anything (in a
scientific sense); evidence must be visible to all and not
rely on any particular system of belief (other than the
belief that reality is observable) to be considered
scientific.
Third, the supernatural is *by definition* outside the
purview of science, which addresses only observable
reality. Relativity is about observable reality;
supernatural entities are not.
Your beliefs don't constrain reality, nor do they constitute
evidence.
[quote]========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
--[/quote]
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| George Hammond... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:35:01 -0700, Bob Casanova
<nospam at (no spam) buzz.off> wrote:
[quote]
Sorry, but this...
"First, since gravity is real, God is real. Secondly,
tradition tells us that God is "supernatural" and we find
that Relativity explains the supernatural aspect of God.
Relativity is the only physical phenomena which causes a
'supernatural' effect on reality; reality being space and
time itself."
...contains *at least* 3 significant errors.
First, the existence of gravity implies nothing about the
existence of God. Gravity is a function of the curvature of
space-time.
[Hammond][/quote]
Okay try and pay attention:
Gravity is a curvature of OBJECTIVE space time.
God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE space time .
Definition:
OBJECTIVE space time is measured relative to the clock on
the wall and a ruler.
SUBJECTIVE space time is what any given individual actually
sees.
Clearly objective space time is universal for all people.
And just as clearly subjective space time is different for
every individual. For instance a five-year-old kid sees a
larger and faster world than eight point-year-old adult. So
that is an example of how SUBJECTIVE SPACE TIME varies from
person to person.
So your first objection is immediately thrown out of court.
[quote]
Second, tradition is not evidence for anything (in a
scientific sense); evidence must be visible to all and not
rely on any particular system of belief (other than the
belief that reality is observable) to be considered
scientific.
[Hammond][/quote]
your second objection is rule of court as follows. We
assume the entire history of religion to be an
"unsubstantiated claim". And then we discover an actual
proven scientific phenomenon which turns out to predict that
precise claim in every exact detail! That is what is known
as a scientific proof of God.
So your second objection has been tossed out of court.
[quote]
Third, the supernatural is *by definition* outside the
purview of science, which addresses only observable
reality. Relativity is about observable reality;
supernatural entities are not.
Your beliefs don't constrain reality, nor do they constitute
evidence.
[Hammond][/quote]
Wrong again Toynbee. Science claims that so-called
supernatural phenomena are simply phenomena for which the
scientific explanation HAS NOT YET been discovered. So
therefore I am simply pointing out that the previously
called "supernatural" phenomena of God actually has been
found to have a PROVEN experimentally measured and
theoretically known, scientific explanation.
So your third objection has now been rudely ejected from the
courtroom.
But don't go away mad, although your commentary is based
on elementary misconception of the theory, I am more than
impressed by your professional and polite demeanor which
indicates a significant ability, awareness, and above all
else serious motivation.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
======================================= |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:54 pm
|
|