 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Two clocks; one moving past the other at high speed... |
|
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| nuny at (no spam) bid.nes... |
 Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 5, 11:36 am, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful"..
It has its advantages.
No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important.
Mitch Raemsch
No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify
"most important" ?
Through my intuition. And it is never wrong.
[/quote]
What is your intuition's answer my question;
"One train is stationary with respect to the Earth, but the Earth is
rotating with an equatorial velocity of ~1000 mph eastward. The other
train is traveling westward at 1000 mph, cancelling the Earth's
rotation velocity.
Which train's clock runs slow?"
Mark L. Fergerson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3297
|
On Nov 5, 12:52 pm, "n... at (no spam) bid.nes" <alien8... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 11:36 am, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful".
It has its advantages.
No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important.
Mitch Raemsch
No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify
"most important" ?
Through my intuition. And it is never wrong.
What is your intuition's answer my question;
"One train is stationary with respect to the Earth, but the Earth is
rotating with an equatorial velocity of ~1000 mph eastward. The other
train is traveling westward at 1000 mph, cancelling the Earth's
rotation velocity.
Which train's clock runs slow?"
Mark L. Fergerson
[/quote]
With respect to the space they traverse through globaly(since there is
no absolute rest) both are going slow.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:27 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3297
|
On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.[/quote]
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:43 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3297
|
On Nov 5, 6:27 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com....
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups..com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Everything has a rate though it may be different. This creates
different appearences of outer clocks. And there is no proper time if
time ends altogether in any frame.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Aleph... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thursday 05 November 2009 19:36, in <7f26dad9-
a4c5-42d0-9dea-1d3d78d0696e at (no spam) d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, BURT sat down and
wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful".
It has its advantages.
No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important.
Mitch Raemsch
No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify
"most important" ?
Through my intuition. And it is never wrong.
Mitch Raemsch
[/quote]
Just when I thought the kookfest was getting boring, out came your
meglomania.
Wonderful.
Thanks Mitch.
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ralph Garbage... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 5, 4:17 pm, Aleph <Usenet.... at (no spam) gishpuppy.com> wrote:
[quote]On Thursday 05 November 2009 19:36, in <7f26dad9-
a4c5-42d0-9dea-1d3d78d06... at (no spam) d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, BURT sat down and
wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful".
It has its advantages.
No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important.
Mitch Raemsch
No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify
"most important" ?
Through my intuition. And it is never wrong.
Mitch Raemsch
Just when I thought the kookfest was getting boring, out came your
meglomania.
Wonderful.
Thanks Mitch.
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored.
[/quote]
What's really precious is that, above and beyond all the other
incredibly stupid people that rant here, including such luminaries as
strict9 and spaceman, the most demented, by far, is Mitch. He brings
it to a whole 'nother level. What's truly spectacular is that he's
never right, which defies all odds (my favorite was his repeated
prediction of his pending Nobel prizes). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BURT" <macromitch at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 4, 8:54 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
[/quote]
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| nuny at (no spam) bid.nes... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 5, 3:05 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 12:52 pm, "n... at (no spam) bid.nes" <alien8... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:36 am, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful".
It has its advantages.
No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important.
Mitch Raemsch
No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify
"most important" ?
Through my intuition. And it is never wrong.
What is your intuition's answer my question;
"One train is stationary with respect to the Earth, but the Earth is
rotating with an equatorial velocity of ~1000 mph eastward. The other
train is traveling westward at 1000 mph, cancelling the Earth's
rotation velocity.
Which train's clock runs slow?"
Mark L. Fergerson
With respect to the space they traverse through globaly(since there is
no absolute rest) both are going slow.
[/quote]
First, going slow with respect to what, exactly? What clock can be
seen as going faster than both trains' clocks?
Second, in the first post in this thread you wrote:
"If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science."
Your statement says that the idle train will see the moving train's
clock going fast. You have contradicted yourself. Care to back up and
try again?
Mark L. Fergerson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BURT" <macromitch at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c9d0c172-8dfe-4fa2-a37d-196f1debb69d at (no spam) g10g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be
seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that
that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be
any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
[/quote]
More crap form BURT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BURT" <macromitch at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:20190a1f-0446-4128-ba31-3c0cd37ccd34 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 5, 6:27 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be
seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks
passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that
that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be
any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid
for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Everything has a rate though it may be different. This creates
different appearences of outer clocks. And there is no proper time if
time ends altogether in any frame.
[/quote]
Fuck off spammer |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3297
|
On Nov 5, 11:21 pm, "n... at (no spam) bid.nes" <alien8... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 3:05 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 12:52 pm, "n... at (no spam) bid.nes" <alien8... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:36 am, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful".
It has its advantages.
No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important.
Mitch Raemsch
No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify
"most important" ?
Through my intuition. And it is never wrong.
What is your intuition's answer my question;
"One train is stationary with respect to the Earth, but the Earth is
rotating with an equatorial velocity of ~1000 mph eastward. The other
train is traveling westward at 1000 mph, cancelling the Earth's
rotation velocity.
Which train's clock runs slow?"
Mark L. Fergerson
With respect to the space they traverse through globaly(since there is
no absolute rest) both are going slow.
First, going slow with respect to what, exactly? What clock can be
seen as going faster than both trains' clocks?
Second, in the first post in this thread you wrote:
"If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science."
Your statement says that the idle train will see the moving train's
clock going fast. You have contradicted yourself. Care to back up and
try again?
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
If one clock slower than other there isn't anything to make the wrong
appearence. It will be seen as it is.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| xxein... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 5, 9:27 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com....
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm,xxein<xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups..com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
xxein: True. Nobody could penetrate your idiocy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:01 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3297
|
On Nov 6, 3:55 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 5, 9:27 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com....
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm,xxein<xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other. This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
xxein: True. Nobody could penetrate your idiocy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
No. I don't let anybody effect me for the negative. Go judge the other
educated people who are compensating with the hubris of science.
Science doesn't know much.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:28 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3297
|
On Nov 6, 6:42 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:adcbf288-0d92-4aca-936a-87f82ee4649b at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 3:55 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 5, 9:27 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm,xxein<xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will
be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks
passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other.
This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that
that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't
be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid
for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether
after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
xxein: True. Nobody could penetrate your idiocy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No. I don't let anybody effect me for the negative. Go judge the other
educated people who are compensating with the hubris of science.
Science doesn't know much.
You only know how to spam off-topic random nonsensical sentences and pretend
they have meaning.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
I see no meaning from you.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BURT" <macromitch at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:adcbf288-0d92-4aca-936a-87f82ee4649b at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 6, 3:55 pm, xxein <xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 5, 9:27 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 6:02 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9e4d2ab-86e0-406e-8e56-37a8fb4e8763 at (no spam) g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 4, 8:54 pm,xxein<xx... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:54 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"BURT" <macromi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0d4fefb0-ed41-45e3-b67f-694d1fab63ba at (no spam) x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
If the trains clock is the only one going slow then it will
be seen
as
the only one going slow. The train will see fast clocks
passing
around
it. What is not seen is each going slower than the other.
This
contradiction is dumb science.
So speaks the dumb non-scientist.
If only one clock is the one going slow it can only be seen that
that
clock is running slower than the other in every frame. It can't
be any
other way.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: If you are stupid, it can only be seen that you are stupid
for
every case. It can't be any other way.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I see you are talking about yourself.
I am an aether scientist. Even Einstein brought back the aether
after
he developed General Relativity.
You are no scientist .. you're a bullshit artist.- Hide quoted text -
Carl Marx said accuse your enermy of what you do. It was fullproof.
I won't let you do that to me.
Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
xxein: True. Nobody could penetrate your idiocy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No. I don't let anybody effect me for the negative. Go judge the other
educated people who are compensating with the hubris of science.
Science doesn't know much.
[/quote]
You only know how to spam off-topic random nonsensical sentences and pretend
they have meaning. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:51 pm
|
|