 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » LCROSS crash RESULTS!... |
|
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Saul Levy... |
 Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Double-A... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 6, 2:58 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
Mercury on the Moon? More amalgam for our teeth!
Double-A
[/quote]
I'm convinced that my old cellphone camera could have gotten us better
resolution, as well as better color saturations.
That wussy 6 to 8 km plume from such a minimal crater contained a
great deal of sodium. Notice how they got no sign of any water (gee
whiz, what a surprise). Too bad they didn't have a 14 tonne upper
stage like those multiple Apollo ones that smacked into the moon and
were never observed for their scientific data other than seismic,
which we never got to see any of that raw data either.
So, why not just give us those original spectrometer channel by
channel readings (the whole 9 yards, so to speak)?
Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I believe they do that, GOOFYSHIT, just to RILE YOU UP! lmfjao!
It always gets the SAME REPLY so I guess it works.
Saul Levy
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:53:02 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Nov 6, 2:58 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
Mercury on the Moon? More amalgam for our teeth!
Double-A
I'm convinced that my old cellphone camera could have gotten us better
resolution, as well as better color saturations.
That wussy 6 to 8 km plume from such a minimal crater contained a
great deal of sodium. Notice how they got no sign of any water (gee
whiz, what a surprise). Too bad they didn't have a 14 tonne upper
stage like those multiple Apollo ones that smacked into the moon and
were never observed for their scientific data other than seismic,
which we never got to see any of that raw data either.
So, why not just give us those original spectrometer channel by
channel readings (the whole 9 yards, so to speak)?
Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, "Hagar" <hs... at (no spam) surewest.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aff5c7f3-87ec-4fa0-b705-e232edc69085 at (no spam) u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 2:58 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
Mercury on the Moon? More amalgam for our teeth!
Double-A
I'm convinced that my old cellphone camera could have gotten us better
resolution, as well as better color saturations.
That wussy 6 to 8 km plume from such a minimal crater contained a
great deal of sodium. Notice how they got no sign of any water (gee
whiz, what a surprise). Too bad they didn't have a 14 tonne upper
stage like those multiple Apollo ones that smacked into the moon and
were never observed for their scientific data other than seismic,
which we never got to see any of that raw data either.
So, why not just give us those original spectrometer channel by
channel readings (the whole 9 yards, so to speak)?
Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG
***********************************
GuthBall, I have an old Argus C5, 35mm. I can fix that up for you,
if you can get an ok from NASA to strap you onto the side of the
next rocket they hurl at the Moon. You can take pictures all the
way down to the impact site ... since you're full of shit. it'll just
leave a brown stain on the dark surface. Future generation may,
however, retrieve the camera and develop the 36 pictures of your
step-by-step demise ....
[/quote]
Unlike yourself, I already know first hand what those Kodak laws of
film physics are all about. I also know UV fluorescence, as well as
what dynamic range means.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hagar... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aff5c7f3-87ec-4fa0-b705-e232edc69085 at (no spam) u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 2:58 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
Mercury on the Moon? More amalgam for our teeth!
Double-A
[/quote]
I'm convinced that my old cellphone camera could have gotten us better
resolution, as well as better color saturations.
That wussy 6 to 8 km plume from such a minimal crater contained a
great deal of sodium. Notice how they got no sign of any water (gee
whiz, what a surprise). Too bad they didn't have a 14 tonne upper
stage like those multiple Apollo ones that smacked into the moon and
were never observed for their scientific data other than seismic,
which we never got to see any of that raw data either.
So, why not just give us those original spectrometer channel by
channel readings (the whole 9 yards, so to speak)?
Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG
***********************************
GuthBall, I have an old Argus C5, 35mm. I can fix that up for you,
if you can get an ok from NASA to strap you onto the side of the
next rocket they hurl at the Moon. You can take pictures all the
way down to the impact site ... since you're full of shit. it'll just
leave a brown stain on the dark surface. Future generation may,
however, retrieve the camera and develop the 36 pictures of your
step-by-step demise .... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 8:21 am, "Hagar" <hs... at (no spam) surewest.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52021a74-cb86-485d-85c4-ccae85541659 at (no spam) s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, "Hagar" <hs... at (no spam) surewest.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aff5c7f3-87ec-4fa0-b705-e232edc69085 at (no spam) u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com....
On Nov 6, 2:58 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
Mercury on the Moon? More amalgam for our teeth!
Double-A
I'm convinced that my old cellphone camera could have gotten us better
resolution, as well as better color saturations.
That wussy 6 to 8 km plume from such a minimal crater contained a
great deal of sodium. Notice how they got no sign of any water (gee
whiz, what a surprise). Too bad they didn't have a 14 tonne upper
stage like those multiple Apollo ones that smacked into the moon and
were never observed for their scientific data other than seismic,
which we never got to see any of that raw data either.
So, why not just give us those original spectrometer channel by
channel readings (the whole 9 yards, so to speak)?
Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG
***********************************
GuthBall, I have an old Argus C5, 35mm. I can fix that up for you,
if you can get an ok from NASA to strap you onto the side of the
next rocket they hurl at the Moon. You can take pictures all the
way down to the impact site ... since you're full of shit. it'll just
leave a brown stain on the dark surface. Future generation may,
however, retrieve the camera and develop the 36 pictures of your
step-by-step demise ....
Unlike yourself, I already know first hand what those Kodak laws of
film physics are all about. I also know UV fluorescence, as well as
what dynamic range means.
~ BG
*******************************
Well, good for you, wunderchild ... I just point and click.
Comes out perfect every time. No need to study dynamic
range or UV fluorescence.
So, what was your point, doofus ???
[/quote]
If I were a parrot like yourself, I wouldn't have any point to make.
Otherwise, the entire LRO and its secondary LCROSS mission has been
insider limited as to sharing the vast scope of science that should
have been a whole lot more forthcoming. It's bad enough that it's
nearly a half century late to begin with.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 12:23 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"Saul Levy" <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in messagenews:d9gbf59e45fbc9344bc0insvile8ak7ip9 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Same OL' GOOFY SHIT, GOOFYSHIT! lmfjao!
Parrot just doesn't seem to cover what GOOFY writes!
Saul Levy
Key wound parrot with battery back up?
[/quote]
? (when even parrots stop making sense, perhaps it's time to pack it
in)
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hagar... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52021a74-cb86-485d-85c4-ccae85541659 at (no spam) s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, "Hagar" <hs... at (no spam) surewest.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aff5c7f3-87ec-4fa0-b705-e232edc69085 at (no spam) u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 2:58 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
Mercury on the Moon? More amalgam for our teeth!
Double-A
I'm convinced that my old cellphone camera could have gotten us better
resolution, as well as better color saturations.
That wussy 6 to 8 km plume from such a minimal crater contained a
great deal of sodium. Notice how they got no sign of any water (gee
whiz, what a surprise). Too bad they didn't have a 14 tonne upper
stage like those multiple Apollo ones that smacked into the moon and
were never observed for their scientific data other than seismic,
which we never got to see any of that raw data either.
So, why not just give us those original spectrometer channel by
channel readings (the whole 9 yards, so to speak)?
Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG
***********************************
GuthBall, I have an old Argus C5, 35mm. I can fix that up for you,
if you can get an ok from NASA to strap you onto the side of the
next rocket they hurl at the Moon. You can take pictures all the
way down to the impact site ... since you're full of shit. it'll just
leave a brown stain on the dark surface. Future generation may,
however, retrieve the camera and develop the 36 pictures of your
step-by-step demise ....
[/quote]
Unlike yourself, I already know first hand what those Kodak laws of
film physics are all about. I also know UV fluorescence, as well as
what dynamic range means.
~ BG
*******************************
Well, good for you, wunderchild ... I just point and click.
Comes out perfect every time. No need to study dynamic
range or UV fluorescence.
So, what was your point, doofus ??? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Same OL' GOOFY SHIT, GOOFYSHIT! lmfjao!
Parrot just doesn't seem to cover what GOOFY writes!
Saul Levy
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:17:15 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Nov 7, 8:21 am, "Hagar" <hs... at (no spam) surewest.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
[/quote]
[quote]On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Yes, Virginia, there ARE LCROSS CRASH RESULTS!
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/68841092.html
I told you FOOLS that NO SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT IS WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
[/quote]
[quote]Where are those LCROSS UV secondary fluorescence hues? (invisible or
perhaps restricted to monochrome?)
~ BG
***********************************
Unlike yourself, I already know first hand what those Kodak laws of
film physics are all about. I also know UV fluorescence, as well as
what dynamic range means.
~ BG
*******************************
Well, good for you, wunderchild ... I just point and click.
Comes out perfect every time. No need to study dynamic
range or UV fluorescence.
So, what was your point, doofus ???
If I were a parrot like yourself, I wouldn't have any point to make.
Otherwise, the entire LRO and its secondary LCROSS mission has been
insider limited as to sharing the vast scope of science that should
have been a whole lot more forthcoming. It's bad enough that it's
nearly a half century late to begin with.
~ BG[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 3:00 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:f4143d7c-2e3f-47e7-8fa2-f70c1910ea11 at (no spam) i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
? (when even parrots stop making sense, perhaps it's time to pack it
in)
That's the difference between you and I. I have "working" original thought.
You do not. Hence, your propensity to blather on about crap that is not
possible and really serves zero purpose.
[/quote]
And a good example of that unplagiarized original thought is????
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nightcrawler... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:d9gbf59e45fbc9344bc0insvile8ak7ip9 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote]Same OL' GOOFY SHIT, GOOFYSHIT! lmfjao!
Parrot just doesn't seem to cover what GOOFY writes!
Saul Levy
[/quote]
Key wound parrot with battery back up? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 5:40 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:98f5df7f-86cf-4e01-94d6-82c96da5db52 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
And a good example of that unplagiarized original thought is????
I have many. Why should I share them with you? I am not the one
here trying to pimp stupid theories and unworkable concepts while
decrying those that use known knowledge to disprove the same.
[/quote]
Suppose if I were as ashamed of my accomplishments or lack thereof, I
too would be unwilling to share.
Last time I'd checked, the regular laws of physics and best available
science that can be independently peer replicated were not "stupid
theories and unworkable concepts", but then I'm not nearly as kosher
mindset or as trained parrot as yourself.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nightcrawler... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message news:f4143d7c-2e3f-47e7-8fa2-f70c1910ea11 at (no spam) i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
[quote]? (when even parrots stop making sense, perhaps it's time to pack it
in)
[/quote]
That's the difference between you and I. I have "working" original thought.
You do not. Hence, your propensity to blather on about crap that is not
possible and really serves zero purpose. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nightcrawler... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message news:98f5df7f-86cf-4e01-94d6-82c96da5db52 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
[quote]And a good example of that unplagiarized original thought is????
[/quote]
I have many. Why should I share them with you? I am not the one
here trying to pimp stupid theories and unworkable concepts while
decrying those that use known knowledge to disprove the same. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:29 am
|
|