 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » 1st Images From Herschel... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Nightcrawler... |
 Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message news:3792fb27-5e0c-4c93-8024-a7a0cccae808 at (no spam) d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
[quote:1147a88daf]So, why do you accept anything about these Herschel images that are
digital, a composite of multiple frame stacked, resampled and thus
enlarged to death and otherwise eyecandy false colorized to suit?
~ BG
[/quote:1147a88daf]
Uh, visible light spectrum? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 5, 3:13 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:3792fb27-5e0c-4c93-8024-a7a0cccae808 at (no spam) d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
So, why do you accept anything about these Herschel images that are
digital, a composite of multiple frame stacked, resampled and thus
enlarged to death and otherwise eyecandy false colorized to suit?
~ BG
Uh, visible light spectrum?
[/quote]
Human sight perceives all of perhaps at most 0.0001% of the
electromagnetic spectrum. Virtually all published images are stacked
composites, false colored, hue saturation pushed and otherwise
PhotoShop enlarged and thus altered to death.
The extreme UV is hardly within the human visual spectrum.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hey FUCKWIT, that's YOUR SICKENING STORY, NOT MINE! lmfjao!
It's YOU that don't count!
What a VILLAGE IDIOT!
Saul Levy
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]According to rabbi Saul, Hagar and others of their kosher kind that
collectively speak for all other Jews, such digital images don't count
(including most of those by Hubble), because they're stacked,
colorized and otherwise a composite as well as extensively PhotoShop
resampled/enlarged for maximum eyecandy impact.
~ BG[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:04 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You've BEEN ASSRAPED, FOOL, so YOU KNOW! lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Oct 4, 9:17 am, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
Were you ass-raped by Polanski with a Puckered Pickle or something?
"ButtGibb" <blathering... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:e7fd43be-fda7-4df7-bfc0-1e3f1885c80f at (no spam) k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Proof positive of what a liar you and kosher Republican are. Thanks!
~ BG
Not being a Zionist/Nazi Jew, what would I know about ass rapings?
~ BG[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Puck Greenman... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:31:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 5, 3:13 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:3792fb27-5e0c-4c93-8024-a7a0cccae808 at (no spam) d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
So, why do you accept anything about these Herschel images that are
digital, a composite of multiple frame stacked, resampled and thus
enlarged to death and otherwise eyecandy false colorized to suit?
~ BG
Uh, visible light spectrum?
Human sight perceives all of perhaps at most 0.0001% of the
electromagnetic spectrum. Virtually all published images are stacked
composites, false colored, hue saturation pushed and otherwise
PhotoShop enlarged and thus altered to death.
The extreme UV is hardly within the human visual spectrum.
~ BG
[/quote]
Sounds like a bad case of Sour Grapes.
I suppose it is right what they say, "Those that can, do, those that can't, criticise" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 24, 1:12 pm, Puck Greenman <dubh_gh... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:31:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 5, 3:13 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:3792fb27-5e0c-4c93-8024-a7a0cccae808 at (no spam) d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
So, why do you accept anything about these Herschel images that are
digital, a composite of multiple frame stacked, resampled and thus
enlarged to death and otherwise eyecandy false colorized to suit?
~ BG
Uh, visible light spectrum?
Human sight perceives all of perhaps at most 0.0001% of the
electromagnetic spectrum. Virtually all published images are stacked
composites, false colored, hue saturation pushed and otherwise
PhotoShop enlarged and thus altered to death.
The extreme UV is hardly within the human visual spectrum.
~ BG
Sounds like a bad case of Sour Grapes.
I suppose it is right what they say, "Those that can, do, those that can't, criticise"
[/quote]
Human sight perceives all of perhaps at most 0.0001% of the
electromagnetic spectrum. Virtually all published images are stacked
composites, false colored, hue saturation pushed and otherwise
PhotoShop enlarged and thus altered to death.
The extreme UV is hardly within the human visual spectrum.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 3, 4:12 am, "HVAC" <harlowcampb... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]http://herschel.esac.esa.int/FirstParallelModeImages.shtml
This thing is gonna kick the shit outta theHubble
[/quote]
If we pointed Hubble at the darkest part of the universe and kept the
exposure of everything from UV to IR going for one full year; how
many hundreds or perhaps thousands of previously unknown galaxies
would show up within that one FOV?
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:26 pm
|
|