Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Space - History Forum  »  New Apollo 17 images...
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

New Apollo 17 images...

Author Message
Pat Flannery...
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:35 am
Guest
On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage: http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat
 
Matt Wiser...
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:57 pm
Guest
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:
[quote]On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat
[/quote]
Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.
 
BradGuth...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:15 am
Guest
On Oct 31, 4:57 pm, Matt Wiser <mattwiser... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.
[/quote]
Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

~ BG
 
BradGuth...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:25 am
Guest
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:
[quote]On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat
[/quote]
And some how that physically dark moon is free of X-rays, gamma,
electrostatic charged dust, none of that pesky sodium and not the
least bit of UV secondary fluorescence (in other words our naked moon
is strictly monochrome gray and somewhat inert, as in free of most all
minerals or raw elements?). But none the less, somehow there's water
in them rocks?

Where's the other 99.9% of the LRO science?

How about the Selene/moon L1 science, or didn't they go anywhere near
that zone on their way to the moon?

~ BG
 
Orval Fairbairn...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:40 pm
Guest
In article
<139eafee-40a2-4aed-a459-3cd812c964c8 at (no spam) t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

[quote]On Oct 31, 4:57 pm, Matt Wiser <mattwiser... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

~ BG
[/quote]
Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
 
BradGuth...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:28 pm
Guest
On Nov 1, 10:40 am, Orval Fairbairn <o_r_fairbairn at (no spam) earth_link.net>
wrote:
[quote]In article
139eafee-40a2-4aed-a459-3cd812c96... at (no spam) t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,







 BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 31, 4:57 pm, Matt Wiser <mattwiser... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired..
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

 ~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

--
Remove _'s  from email address to talk to me.
[/quote]
Good grief, it's 5th grade physics-10. You are not kidding anyone
except yourself.

Are you suggesting that the albedo is more like 0.65?

~ BG

~ BG

~ BG
 
BradGuth...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:32 am
Guest
On Nov 2, 10:48 am, "Matt Wiser" <MattWiser... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]Expecting the Guthlessball to respond to such a question with anything
logical is a waste of time."Orval Fairbairn" <o_r_fairbairn at (no spam) earth_link.net> wrote in message

news:o_r_fairbairn-F64455.14405501112009 at (no spam) 70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net....

In article
139eafee-40a2-4aed-a459-3cd812c96... at (no spam) t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
 BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 31, 4:57 pm, Matt Wiser <mattwiser... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM
descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

 ~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

--
Remove _'s  from email address to talk to me.
[/quote]
Correct, those regular laws of physics and best available science is
always a waste of time with you folks. Screw whatever Kodak film is
capable of here on Earth, because apparently on the moon it works and
performs entirely different by converting the physically dark average
albedo of 11% into 65%, as well as not capable of recording any UV
fluorescence because apparently our moon is made of only a grayish
monochrome of inert matter that oddly acts as.a secondary photon
reflector in order to minimize whatever harsh shadows, as good or
better than having a second and third light source to fill in those
otherwise extremely contrasty shadows.

BTW, where's Venus in any of those missions?

~ BG
 
BradGuth...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:12 am
Guest
On Nov 2, 9:17 am, "Peter Cushing's Ghost" <P... at (no spam) houseofhammer.com>
wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" sez:

Correct, those regular laws of physics and best available science is
always a waste of time with you folks.  Screw whatever Kodak film is
capable of here on Earth, because apparently on the moon it works and
performs entirely different by converting the physically dark average
albedo of 11% into 65%, as well as not capable of recording any UV
fluorescence because apparently our moon is made of only a grayish
monochrome of inert matter that oddly acts as.a secondary photon
reflector in order to minimize whatever harsh shadows, as good or
better than having a second and third light source to fill in those
otherwise extremely contrasty shadows.

BTW,  where's Venus in any of those missions?

+++++++++++

Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same room.
[/quote]
Imagine if your Zionist Nazi religion was outlawed, might actually
screw up any chance of WW3.

~ BG
 
Peter Cushing's Ghost...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:17 pm
Guest
"BradGuth" sez:


Correct, those regular laws of physics and best available science is
always a waste of time with you folks. Screw whatever Kodak film is
capable of here on Earth, because apparently on the moon it works and
performs entirely different by converting the physically dark average
albedo of 11% into 65%, as well as not capable of recording any UV
fluorescence because apparently our moon is made of only a grayish
monochrome of inert matter that oddly acts as.a secondary photon
reflector in order to minimize whatever harsh shadows, as good or
better than having a second and third light source to fill in those
otherwise extremely contrasty shadows.

BTW, where's Venus in any of those missions?

+++++++++++

Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same room.
 
Matt Wiser...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:48 pm
Guest
Expecting the Guthlessball to respond to such a question with anything
logical is a waste of time.
"Orval Fairbairn" <o_r_fairbairn at (no spam) earth_link.net> wrote in message
news:o_r_fairbairn-F64455.14405501112009 at (no spam) 70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...
[quote]In article
139eafee-40a2-4aed-a459-3cd812c964c8 at (no spam) t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 31, 4:57 pm, Matt Wiser <mattwiser... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery <flan... at (no spam) daktel.com> wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM
descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.[/quote]
 
Peter Cushing's Ghost...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:35 pm
Guest
"BradGuth" sez:
[quote]
Correct, those regular laws of physics and best available science is
always a waste of time with you folks. Screw whatever Kodak film is
capable of here on Earth, because apparently on the moon it works and
performs entirely different by converting the physically dark average
albedo of 11% into 65%, as well as not capable of recording any UV
fluorescence because apparently our moon is made of only a grayish
monochrome of inert matter that oddly acts as.a secondary photon
reflector in order to minimize whatever harsh shadows, as good or
better than having a second and third light source to fill in those
otherwise extremely contrasty shadows.

BTW, where's Venus in any of those missions?

+++++++++++

Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same
room.
[/quote]
Imagine if your Zionist Nazi religion was outlawed, might actually
screw up any chance of WW3.

++++++++

I'm a Muslim Fundamentalist. I want to drag society back to the stone age
where things like science and basic hygiene won't even be a concern.
 
BradGuth...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:23 pm
Guest
On Nov 2, 2:35 pm, "Peter Cushing's Ghost" <P... at (no spam) houseofhammer.com>
wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" sez:





Correct, those regular laws of physics and best available science is
always a waste of time with you folks. Screw whatever Kodak film is
capable of here on Earth, because apparently on the moon it works and
performs entirely different by converting the physically dark average
albedo of 11% into 65%, as well as not capable of recording any UV
fluorescence because apparently our moon is made of only a grayish
monochrome of inert matter that oddly acts as.a secondary photon
reflector in order to minimize whatever harsh shadows, as good or
better than having a second and third light source to fill in those
otherwise extremely contrasty shadows.

BTW, where's Venus in any of those missions?

+++++++++++

Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same
room.

Imagine if your Zionist Nazi religion was outlawed, might actually
screw up any chance of WW3.

++++++++

I'm a Muslim Fundamentalist.  I want to drag society back to the stone age
where things like science and basic hygiene won't even be a concern.
[/quote]
Funny ruse you've got going there.

How about those 30 NK15 first stage rocket engines and otherwise 5
stages for getting their smaller and less massive lander to the moon
(which of course never took place because they never had a viable
lander or even a reliable primary rocket to begin with).

Say again why we shit-canned our Saturn V.

~ BG
 
Scott Stevenson...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:54 am
Guest
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:17:44 -0800, "Peter Cushing's Ghost"
<PCG at (no spam) houseofhammer.com> wrote:

[quote]"BradGuth" sez:
very little, despite the amount he talks.[/quote]

[quote]
Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same room.
[/quote]
If you used either of them as part of a Turing Test, the
interrogator would select them as "computer". BG just strings
together keywords into something that might, under some conditions, be
considered a sentence. KT simply ignores input, and spouts a canned
response. He/she/it is just a "Magic 8 ball" of profanity.

take care,
Scott
"Try again later, motherf%^*&*r"
 
Matt Wiser...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:14 am
Guest
"Peter Cushing's Ghost" <PCG at (no spam) houseofhammer.com> wrote in message
news:odKdnfgrcM2kiXLXnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d at (no spam) giganews.com...

[quote]Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same
room.[/quote]

I don't know whether to laugh or puke if that happened. Maybe both.
 
OM...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:10 am
Guest
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:14:12 -0800, "Matt Wiser"
<MattWiser_88 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

[quote]
"Peter Cushing's Ghost" <PCG at (no spam) houseofhammer.com> wrote in message
news:odKdnfgrcM2kiXLXnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d at (no spam) giganews.com...

Imagine the mind-numbing comedy if Guth and KT were stuck in the same
room.

I don't know whether to laugh or puke if that happened. Maybe both.
[/quote]
....The fear is that the two bastards will breed with one another.
Imagine offspring that looked like a cross between Hitler and Gollum.

OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
 
 
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:12 pm