 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Electronics - Design Forum » OT: Psychological condiction of those who hate others... |
|
Page 4 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| JosephKK... |
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:10:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net>
wrote:
[quote]On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:16:02 -0700, Robert Baer wrote:
amdx wrote:
"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaughter at (no spam) Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hblluq$ko5$1 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org...
Anyone know if there is a psychological term for those who believe those
that have wealth are evil and wish to do them harm? I don't mean in an
economic or political sense but those that have some disorder from
childhood.
Two forms;
Socialist, being the least severe, often treated with behavioral therapy and
communist a more severe disorder and more difficult to treat,
electroshock therapy is sometimes helpful.
These treatments actually WORK on congress critters and the like?
I object to "shock therapy" because it's nothing but thinly veiled torture:
"Stop being crazy, and we'll stop torturing you!"
Thanks,
Rich
[/quote]
Sounds like an exactly appropriate application for congresscritters.
Stop screwing the public and we may stop torturing you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:29:32 -0700,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:39:16 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:30:34 -0400, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:42:07 -0400, Phil Hobbs wrote:
...
Each one is a sin against one or more of the corresponding virtues.
Lust <-- Justice, temperance
Without Lust, where would all the new little believers come from? >:-
I know you're kidding,
One, I'm not, and two, how could you possibly know? Just because it
doesn't fit inside your little box?
Sex without lust would be very boring indeed. Or maybe you're one of
the ones who thinks it should be a chore, only done when you want to
make more little Xtian soldiers?
Thanks,
Rich
Pervert. Proper sex is about sharing, joy, and procreation. No lust
is needed or appropriate, and should not be present; your partner is a
person not an object.
[/quote]
If everybody is having fun, what's wrong with having fun?
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rich Grise... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:36:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
[quote]"JosephKK"<quiettechblue at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:39:16 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
Sex without lust would be very boring indeed. Or maybe you're one of the
ones who thinks it should be a chore, only done when you want to make
more little Xtian soldiers?
Pervert. Proper sex is about sharing, joy, and procreation. No lust is
needed or appropriate, and should not be present; your partner is a
person not an object.
If everybody is having fun, what's wrong with having fun?
[/quote]
I think he was raised by very strict, puritanical, anhedonic parents
who viewed anything enjoyabls as some kind of sin.
The Puritans didn't ban bear-baiting because it caused pain to the
bear; they banned it because it gave pleasure to the spectators.
Cheers!
Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:35:11 -0800, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net>
wrote:
[quote]On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:36:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:39:16 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
Sex without lust would be very boring indeed. Or maybe you're one of the
ones who thinks it should be a chore, only done when you want to make
more little Xtian soldiers?
Pervert. Proper sex is about sharing, joy, and procreation. No lust is
needed or appropriate, and should not be present; your partner is a
person not an object.
If everybody is having fun, what's wrong with having fun?
I think he was raised by very strict, puritanical, anhedonic parents
who viewed anything enjoyabls as some kind of sin.
The Puritans didn't ban bear-baiting because it caused pain to the
bear; they banned it because it gave pleasure to the spectators.
Cheers!
Rich
[/quote]
I've always been flattered to be an object of lust.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rich Grise... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:17:56 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
[quote]On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:35:11 -0800, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:36:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:39:16 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
Sex without lust would be very boring indeed. Or maybe you're one of
the ones who thinks it should be a chore, only done when you want to
make more little Xtian soldiers?
Pervert. Proper sex is about sharing, joy, and procreation. No lust
is needed or appropriate, and should not be present; your partner is a
person not an object.
If everybody is having fun, what's wrong with having fun?
I think he was raised by very strict, puritanical, anhedonic parents who
viewed anything enjoyabls as some kind of sin.
The Puritans didn't ban bear-baiting because it caused pain to the bear;
they banned it because it gave pleasure to the spectators.
I've always been flattered to be an object of lust.
[/quote]
Who hasn't? Well, I mean amongst those of us who _have_ been objects of
lust. <leer, snort>
Cheers!
Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:56 am
|
|