 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Environment Forum » The Blatant Intellectual Dishonesty of AGW Alarmists... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Claudius Denk... |
 Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 1, 10:08 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 1, 10:00 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[/quote]
Claudius Denk:
You are such a desperate retard you have to hide the subject line.
Columbiawhackoinvestigation:
dude, you are so desperate that you had to cut and snip this thread
from another, taking my words out of context, all in an attempt to
excuse your idiocy.
Claudius Denk:
Really? What did I take out of context. Your behavior proves that
you have something to hide.
***** Repost *****
Columbiawhackoinvestigation:
Given the extensive science that has been done in the world of
quantum
mechanics, molar heat capacities, spectroscopy all since woods
experiment, don’t you think you are on thin ice by stating the
question in the manner you have.
Timothy Casey
You are never on thin ice by stating a question, unless people have
something
to hide.
None of the science I've seen adresses the question and a
thermodynamically
valid equation of greenhouse properties is non-existant. If someone
can
prove me wrong without violating the laws of thermodynamics
(particularly
Kirchhoff's Law), I'd be truly delighted.
Claudius Denk:
AGW advocates have everything to hide. Not only do they refuse to
attempt to achieve a valid equation of greenhouse properties but they
refuse to define what a greenhouse property is. By keeping it
informal and vague they can pretend that they have a sound scientific
hypothesis when really all they have is amorphous nonsense.
***** End Repost *****
Thank you for helping me prove my point |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| columbiaaccidentinvestigation... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
you still have work to do show the known properties of "green house
gasses" or gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit
infrared energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum
properties, molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the
information... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Claudius Denk... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 8:38 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
you still have work to do show the known properties of "green house
gasses" or gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit
infrared energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum
properties, molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the
information...
[/quote]
In science the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.
Science ain't for sissies. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| columbiaaccidentinvestigation... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 8:44 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 8:38 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
you still have work to do show the known properties of "green house
gasses" or gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit
infrared energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum
properties, molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the
information...
In science the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.
Science ain't for sissies.
[/quote]
oh great, you misuse science to protect your ignorance, and now you
hide behind lame quotes. How about dont blame others for your
ingorance, you have made some assertions, it is up to you to find the
information to show your assertions are correct. YOU HAVE SHOWN
NOTHING! Now show the known properties of "green house gasses" or
gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit infrared
energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum properties,
molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the information... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Claudius Denk... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
| Leave the subject line alone you intellectually dishonest twerp |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| columbiaaccidentinvestigation... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:09 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 9:08 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
Now show the known properties of "green house gasses" or gases that
transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit infrared energy (that
includes and is not limited to their quantum properties, molar heat
capacities etc...), no excuse show the information... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Claudius Denk... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:26 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 9:09 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 9:08 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
Now show the known properties of "green house gasses" or gases that
transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit infrared energy (that
includes and is not limited to their quantum properties, molar heat
capacities etc...), no excuse show the information...
[/quote]
It's not my responsibility to explain your delusions. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| columbiaaccidentinvestigation... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 9:26 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 9:09 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 9:08 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
Now show the known properties of "green house gasses" or gases that
transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit infrared energy (that
includes and is not limited to their quantum properties, molar heat
capacities etc...), no excuse show the information...
It's not my responsibility to explain your delusions.
[/quote]
what you are responsible for is your ignorance, but you keep fighting
to protect it, meaning you have no place to make the assertions you
have, now run along.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 8:44 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 8:38 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
you still have work to do show the known properties of "green house
gasses" or gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit
infrared energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum
properties, molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the
information...
In science the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.
Science ain't for sissies.
[/quote]
Nor is it a subject you understand |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 9:08 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote]Leave the subject line alone you intellectually dishonest twerp
[/quote]
Like hell you asshole |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Claudius Denk... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 1:06 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 8:44 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 2, 8:38 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
you still have work to do show the known properties of "green house
gasses" or gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit
infrared energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum
properties, molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the
information...
In science the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.
Science ain't for sissies.
Nor is it a subject you understand
[/quote]
Thank you for helping me make my point. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Claudius Denk... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 1, 10:08 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 1, 10:00 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Claudius Denk:
You are such a desperate retard you have to hide the subject line.
Columbiawhackoinvestigation:
dude, you are so desperate that you had to cut and snip this thread
from another, taking my words out of context, all in an attempt to
excuse your idiocy.
Claudius Denk:
Really? What did I take out of context. Your behavior proves that
you have something to hide.
***** Repost *****
Columbiawhackoinvestigation:
Given the extensive science that has been done in the world of
quantum
mechanics, molar heat capacities, spectroscopy all since woods
experiment, don’t you think you are on thin ice by stating the
question in the manner you have.
Timothy Casey
You are never on thin ice by stating a question, unless people have
something
to hide.
None of the science I've seen adresses the question and a
thermodynamically
valid equation of greenhouse properties is non-existant. If someone
can
prove me wrong without violating the laws of thermodynamics
(particularly
Kirchhoff's Law), I'd be truly delighted.
Claudius Denk:
AGW advocates have everything to hide. Not only do they refuse to
attempt to achieve a valid equation of greenhouse properties but they
refuse to define what a greenhouse property is. By keeping it
informal and vague they can pretend that they have a sound scientific
hypothesis when really all they have is amorphous nonsense.
***** End Repost *****
[/quote]
Thank you for helping me prove my point |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Leonard... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 11/2/09 4:06 PM, in article
12e79c34-06ed-4919-93ff-d3c3efce3941 at (no spam) y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com, "richp"
<travelingman95667 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 8:44 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Nov 2, 8:38 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
columbiaaccidentinvestigat... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:52 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:""
you still have work to do show the known properties of "green house
gasses" or gases that transmit visible light, but absorb and reemit
infrared energy (that includes and is not limited to their quantum
properties, molar heat capacities etc...), no excuse show the
information...
In science the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.
Science ain't for sissies.
Nor is it a subject you understand
[/quote]
€€There goes pissypants mouthing off again |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:06 am
|
|