 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Could collisions with Dark Matter explain the... |
|
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| John Curtis... |
 Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Galactic perspective may help with the flyby "anomaly", because
Earth itself is doing a flyby of the Sun with Galactic Center
as the primary body.
At perihelion, Earth crosses in front of Sun's galactic path
and suffers maximum deceleration (Johannes Kepler notwithstanding)
http://quest.nasa.gov/galileo/Galileo-QA/Gravity_Effect/Gravity_Assist.1
The largest flyby anomalies (13.5 mm/s NEAR on January 23, and 3.9 mm/
s,
Galileo on December 8, occurred when Earth was
close to perihelion and deceleratig. Perhaps NEAR's and Galileo's
"anomalous acceleration" should be viewed as
Earth's deceleration in its annual flyby of the Sun. John Curtis |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sam Wormley... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
John Curtis wrote:
[quote]Galactic perspective may help with the flyby "anomaly", because
Earth itself is doing a flyby of the Sun with Galactic Center
as the primary body.
At perihelion, Earth crosses in front of Sun's galactic path
and suffers maximum deceleration (Johannes Kepler notwithstanding)
http://quest.nasa.gov/galileo/Galileo-QA/Gravity_Effect/Gravity_Assist.1
The largest flyby anomalies (13.5 mm/s NEAR on January 23, and 3.9 mm/
s,
Galileo on December 8, occurred when Earth was
close to perihelion and deceleratig. Perhaps NEAR's and Galileo's
"anomalous acceleration" should be viewed as
Earth's deceleration in its annual flyby of the Sun. John Curtis
[/quote]
Why don't you calculate the gravitational forces for us, of the
earth, sun and galaxy (and the galactic center, if you must)
and show us the relative magnitudes of those forces. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Richard D. Saam... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Uncle Al wrote:
[quote]http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.2656
1/3 modeled away
[/quote]
A critical eye to the events producing this 1/3 number indicate its
speculative nature.
The bottom line:
subsequent thermal analysis by varied groups
leads to large error bars not contributing to any conclusion in this
matter beyond original anomalous Pioneer frequency shifts.
Sophisticated myriad finite element analysis does not improve on the
fact that photonic forces from heated surfaces of varied emissivity
is a very difficult calculation prone to initial assumptions.
Richard D. Saam |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Richard D. Saam... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Uncle Al wrote:
[quote]NO DETECTIONS. Gravity Probe B (such as it was) showed no anomaly.
[/quote]
in response:
The Gravity Probe B continued data analysis with KACST?
appears to further confirm Einstein's General Relativity Frame-dragging
theory.
http://einstein.stanford.edu/RESOURCES/presentations-index.html
I would suggest another perspective
which would make the study of Gravity Probe B very important
in the context of analyzing the anomalous "polhode?" effect
in terms of the universal 'dark energy'
a concept which was not known at the Gravity Probe B conception.
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9905007
In this paper (Table 2.4.1), there is a correlation which indicates
that substantially all (~70%) of the universe
(as currently depicted by 'dark energy' at 8.11E-16 K)
has an oscillating period of 2.96E4 sec or 8.22 hours (frequency of
3.38E-5 hz).
The data presented in the seminar,
http://einstein.stanford.edu/RESOURCES/presentations-index.html
indicates this universal dark energy frequency of 3.38E-5 hz
is be harmonically related to seminar presented Asymtotic Polhode
frequencies.
http://einstein.stanford.edu/RESOURCES/presentations-index.html
July 8, 2009 • Stanford University HEPL Seminar
Polhode Motion, Trapped Flux, and the GP-B Science Data Analysis
Alex Silbergleit, John Conklin and the Polhode/Trapped Flux Mapping Task
Team
2.4 Dissipation Modeling: Products
1. Asymptotic Polhode Period and Dissipation Time
| Asymptotic Asymptotic Asymptotic Asymptotic
| Polhode Polhode Polhode Polhode
| Period frequency harmonic harmonic
| (hours) (Hertz) deviation
gyro 1 0.867 3.20E-04 9 1.05
gyro 3 1.529 1.82E-04 5 1.08
gyro 2 2.581 1.08E-04 3 1.06
gyro 4 4.137 6.71E-05 2 0.99
universe 8.22 3.38E-05 1 1.00
The hypothesis would be that this residual asymptotic frequency
is not totally a polhode frequency
but partially an induced gyro frequency,
representing an harmonic of the external universe dark energy
Further, the hypothesis would be that the Gravity Probe B gyroscope
niobium superconductor Cooper mass (5.79E-10 g)
is subject to gravitational tidal oscillation (induced gyro frequency)
by the substantial universe mass (dark energy/c^2)
with density 6.38E-30 g/cc.
The Gravity Probe B gyroscope niobium superconductor Cooper mass
is calculated to be 5.79E-10 g as follows:
niobium critical temperature (Tc) = 8 K niobium
niobium thickness 1270 nm
gyroscope diameter 3.81 cm (1.5 inch)
niobium volume pi*3.81*3.81*1.27E-6 = 5.79E-5 cm3
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9905007
Table 2.9.1
Cooper Pair density is 1E-5 g/cc
Therefore Cooper Pair Mass = 5.79E-10 g
This Cooper Pair Mass may be characterized
in a somewhat fluid form subject to dimensional distortion.
The continued hypothesis would be that the
Cooper Pair mass of 5.79E-10 g
contained in Gravity Probe B gyroscope niobium superconductor
gravitationally tidally oscillates with
the universe mass at a frequency
of 3.38E-05 hertz and harmonics as animated in:
http://einstein.stanford.edu/Media/Polhode_motion-animation.html
approaching an asymptotic value
in step with oscillating universe 'dark energy'.
Similar frequencies have been noted throughout the universe
and in particular the power spectra if Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)
(Seyferts and Blazars)
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0101542
which perhaps have equivalent low densities
(as niobium Cooper pair densities)
subject to such gravitational interaction
with the oscillating universe 'dark energy'.
Also, such frequencies have been noted in the earth's upper atmosphere
under the name 'Temporal variability of the telluric sodium layer'.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609307
Calculations indicate that such an atmospheric tidal effect
by oscillating universe 'dark energy'
would affect flyby spacecraft such as observed.
Such an effect would not be observed in flybys
of non atmospheric celestial bodies.
In conclusion, the Gravity Probe B
may be a measure of Einstein's General Relativity
but perhaps as importantly,
a measure of the universe oscillating 'dark energy'
providing a more fundamental understanding of its nature.
Richard D. Saam |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:37 am
|
|