 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Archaeology Forum » A word about evidence... |
|
Page 4 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| JTEM... |
 Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
First, Shit for Brains, Larry Swain aka Weland,
brings us back to Square-One, posting yet another
example of what I was talking about in the original
post which started this thread:
[quote] Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
So tell us about each sign, what sound it signifies.
[/quote]
I remind everyone who can distinguish legitimate
arguments from illegitimate ones: What would happen
if I failed? Would that cause one of the signs to vanish,
leaving only the "Six" that Larry Swain incorrectly
counted?
Of course not. His "Test" would not nor could not
impact on the question under... under... we'll say
"Debate" for now. His "Test" would not nor could
not impact on the debate. It's entirely irrelevant.
Oddly, Larry Swain claims that this is not some feeble
attempt to trip me up, that he really does see this as
relevant to the question.
Well, at least he denied the merely-trying-to-trip-me-up
charge in another post.
Bad liar or retard? You decide.
If you choose "Bad liar," ask yourself why he would stoop
to such a thing, if he has an honest position to stand on. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tiglath... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 12:31 am, JTEM <jte... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]Tiglath <te... at (no spam) tiglath.net> wrote:
Given that
Wow. So now you're misrepresenting your emotional
problems as "insight."
You just keep getting funnier, and funnier and funnier...
[/quote]
The funniest people are those who post serious things like.
"If Suetonius ever existed."
Whoever wired your brain, must have electrocuted himself long ago. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tiglath... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 12:51 pm, JTEM <jte... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Well that was insightful.
However, people who aren't emotionally disturbed
[/quote]
The same boring repetitious repartee. All his critics are insane and
sock-puppets. Over and over again.
Such lack of imagination. Such poverty of wit.
Such constancy in foolishness.
Such JTEM. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:50 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]It would show what we already know: you don't the
language, or the script,
[/quote]
Okay, moron, let's say that I don't know any language,
nor any script, including the English language....
How does this result in one of the signs vanishing, leaving
only your six?
Explain it, Larry. Give it your best shot. Seriously, really
impress us with your ability to form a coherent thought.
Maybe after you've once again failed you'll go back to the
first post -- the one that started this thread -- and see that,
yes, you've just posted yet ANOTHER example of You.
Not. Getting. It.
Because it is a rather simple matter of counting
the signs. Ignoring the literal mark beneath the second
mouth sign, and counting the initial pair of reeds as one,
there really is a total of seven signs plus determinatives.
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/2796/israelpg0.jpg |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Well that was insightful.
[/quote]
Indeed: your objections are laughable and not based on any fact.
Everyone but you has had that insight.
[quote]
However, people who aren't emotionally disturbed as you
are know that I am right -- that your reply was irrelevant,
that it in no way would or could alter the facts here.
[/quote]
Name one....besides you, Giwer, and Martinus Idiota, oh and our old
friend Cinnabon.
[quote]
You're simply hoping to trip me up.
HAHHAHAHA!! No, you do that all by yourself.
So I was granting you too much credit, and you only
do these things because you honestly don't know
the difference between a legitimate argument and an
illegitimate one... Okay.
[/quote]
Says the chap caught in another fallacy and sidestepping the issue.
Here it again for you:
"Oh, what I know is that you know neither the language nor the script
and so any claim you make regarding the number of signs and what they
mean is based in your own ignorance. If you knew the language or script
you'd produce already and prove me wrong: but since you keep avoiding
answering, we can sit and laugh at you."
You'll predictably snip this, and not address the facts, but there it is. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
First, Shit for Brains, Larry Swain aka Weland,
brings us back to Square-One, posting yet another
example of what I was talking about in the original
post which started this thread:
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
So tell us about each sign, what sound it signifies.
I remind everyone who can distinguish legitimate
arguments from illegitimate ones: What would happen
if I failed?
[/quote]
It would show what we already know: you don't the language, or the
script, or what those signs mean, yet run around and declare you do and
that everyone else is wrong. So go ahead: show us you know these
things. Stop side stepping, craven JStupid.
[quote]Would that cause one of the signs to vanish,
leaving only the "Six" that Larry Swain incorrectly
counted?
[/quote]
Are you sure they're all signs? They all signify different phonemes?
Do you know what a phoneme is?
[quote]Of course not. His "Test" would not nor could not
impact on the question under... under...
[/quote]
Yes it would. But since you failed to enter junior high, it's no
surprise that you can't figure that out.
we'll say
[quote]"Debate" for now. His "Test" would not nor could
not impact on the debate. It's entirely irrelevant.
[/quote]
Fallacy, again. Identifying what the text says is the first step in
identifying what the text means. If you can't do the former, and are
rejecting what qualified experts have published informing you what it
says, you'd best have the skill to do it yourself. If you don't, then
all you are is a laughable clown. But we already knew that.
[quote]
Bad liar or retard? You decide.
[/quote]
Well, you are both. You've been caught out in many lies, and any jester
who doesn't think that identifying what the text says is relevant to
deciding what the text says is like saying "that's not an egg, it's an egg!" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
It would show what we already know: you don't the
language, or the script,
Okay, moron, let's say that I don't know any language,
nor any script, including the English language....
[/quote]
Hey, let's.
[quote]
How does this result in one of the signs vanishing, leaving
only your six?
[/quote]
What matters is what of those signs has phonemic value, to determine
morphology, to determine semantics. You claim I mistransliterated: so
show how it's done, JStupid....you keep avoiding doing just that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
The problem is that the 7 signs JTEM identifies must
include the initial flowering reeds twice.
http://img299.imageshack.us/i/israelpg0.jpg/
Count the signs. It's that simple.
[/quote]
Ok, so it took you this long to look at the line? Now what convinces
you that every sign has phonemic value? Remember, the issue that you
objected to was my transliteration of name. So if I'm wrong, it must
mean that you know how to read those signs on the stele...so show us
that you do. I note again, that you have so far failed to do so...along
with all the other challenges you've been given. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]Hey, let's.
[/quote]
Hey, ignorant coward: Are you as big a pussy as I've
always said, or are you ready to borrow some maturity
and admit your stupid mistake?
Go on, shit for brains, prove me wrong about you being
the single biggest pussy on usenet, and admit your
error. I dare you to. Go on, pussy, admit that you were
wrong when you spent days defending your "Six" (instead
of seven) hieroglyphs.
[quote]What matters is what of those signs has phonemic value,
[/quote]
The signs which you can't even count? You haven't the
faintest clue how many are depicted on the stone, yet you
want to pretend that you're qualified to read them?
Damn, you do you think you're fooling? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]Ok, so it took you this long to look at the line?
[/quote]
Wait a minute. You spent DAYS defending YOUR
claim that there are only six signs depicted... in
addition to misunderstanding what a "Circular
Argument" is.
You have ZERO credibility, despite your constant bluffing.
And to prove it, once again, you're not trying to bullshit
everyone into thinking that your ignorance (you didn't even
know how many signs were carved there!) makes you an
intellectual giant.
Go fuck yourself, you worthless moron. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]No, the ones you can't read.
[/quote]
If you could read the signs you would not only know
how many there are, but you wouldn't keep "reading"
words which aren't there.
Idiot. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]JTEM wrote:
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
Ok, so it took you this long to look at the line?
Wait a minute. You spent DAYS defending YOUR
claim that there are only six signs depicted... in
addition to misunderstanding what a "Circular
Argument" is.
I spent days asking you to tell us how to read it,
[/quote]
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
: Indeed, which would then make the number of symbols
: in the name 6....and let's remember that you were
: whinging not long ago about how there were
: seven signs, not six.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.ancient/msg/be201121e1e40ef4?hl=en&dmode=source
Your retard -- not related to the topic -- "challenge"
only came AFTER you misidentified the number of
signs.
Anyhow, shit for brains, I will respond to your idiotic
smoke screen yet again...
[quote]giving a detailed account of each sign and its phonemic
value to render the name.
[/quote]
As I said the first time you grasped hold of this "Argument"
like a drowning man to a life preserver:
Why? Is the claim that if I don't, or can't, then one of the
signs will magically vanish, leaving only your six?
Again, shit for brains, go back and read the first article
in this thread. You know, the one your mental disorder
stopped you from reading the first... second... third time
I directed you to it.
Good luck. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
Hey, let's.
What matters is what of those signs has phonemic value,
The signs which you can't even count?
[/quote]
No, the ones you can't read. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
Ok, so it took you this long to look at the line?
Wait a minute. You spent DAYS defending YOUR
[/quote]
I spent days asking you to tell us how to read it, giving a detailed
account of each sign and its phonemic value to render the name. You've
avoided this, throwing up sand, kicking your legs wildly, and creating
nonsense...because you are unable to read it, tell us the phonemic
values, etc. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:46 pm
|
|