| Science Forum Index » Environment Forum » Will KRudd Really Give The New World Body $7 Billion A... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| zo nob... |
 Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:29 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
November 1 2009
Next month KRudd goes to Copenhagen to agree to a UN deal to cut emissions.
Point 41 of the draft treaty obliges Australia to hand over an astonishing
$7 billion a year to a new and unelected global authority:
"[Mandatory contributions from developed country Parties and other developed
Parties included in Annex II should form the core revenue stream for meeting
the cost of adaptation in conjunction with additional sources including
share of proceeds from flexible mechanisms.] [This finance should come from
the payment of the adaptation debt by developed country Parties and be based
principally on public-sector funding, while other alternative sources could
be considered.] [[Sources of new and additional financial support for
adaptation] [Financial resources of the "Convention Adaptation Fund"] [may]
[shall] include: "
"(a) [Assessed contributions [of at least 0.7% of the annual GDP of
developed country Parties] [from developed country Parties and other
developed Parties included in
Annex II to the Convention]..."
Australia's GDP now is more than $1000 billion a year.
..7 per cent of that is $7 billion a year.
That's the size of the handout that the UN officials and government
negotiators working on the Copenhagen draft want KRudd to hand over each
year to a new world body.
How many billions is KRudd about to sign away of our wealth?
UPDATE
What the UN' new global warming bureaucrats want from Australia amounts to
twice what we already pay in all forms of foreign aid. Nor does that $7
billion a year represent our total bill under this treaty. Not counted are
the costs for meeting the new emissions targets, and the fines to the UN's
new body for failing to meet any targets,
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/will_rudd_give_the_new_world_body_billion/
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."
Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| B J Foster... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
zo nob wrote:
[quote]November 1 2009
Next month KRudd goes to Copenhagen to agree to a UN deal to cut emissions.
Point 41 of the draft treaty obliges Australia to hand over an astonishing
$7 billion a year to a new and unelected global authority:
[/quote]
Yes, it is astonishing.
That is $350 from each of us - but since only 10% of us pay 80% of the
tax, it is really about $3,500 from the most productive (highest
taxpayers) - $3,500 that could have been invested in jobs and growth.
[quote]
"[Mandatory contributions from developed country Parties and other developed
Parties included in Annex II should form the core revenue stream for meeting
the cost of adaptation in conjunction with additional sources including
share of proceeds from flexible mechanisms.] [This finance should come from
the payment of the adaptation debt by developed country Parties and be based
principally on public-sector funding, while other alternative sources could
be considered.] [[Sources of new and additional financial support for
adaptation] [Financial resources of the "Convention Adaptation Fund"] [may]
[shall] include: "
"(a) [Assessed contributions [of at least 0.7% of the annual GDP of
developed country Parties] [from developed country Parties and other
developed Parties included in
Annex II to the Convention]..."
Australia's GDP now is more than $1000 billion a year.
.7 per cent of that is $7 billion a year.
That's the size of the handout that the UN officials and government
negotiators working on the Copenhagen draft want KRudd to hand over each
year to a new world body.
How many billions is KRudd about to sign away of our wealth?
UPDATE
What the UN' new global warming bureaucrats want from Australia amounts to
twice what we already pay in all forms of foreign aid. Nor does that $7
billion a year represent our total bill under this treaty. Not counted are
the costs for meeting the new emissions targets, and the fines to the UN's
new body for failing to meet any targets,
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/will_rudd_give_the_new_world_body_billion/
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."
Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| affix... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
BS will cost $7 billion a year!?
From his pocket or ours?
zo nob wrote:
[quote]November 1 2009
Next month KRudd goes to Copenhagen to agree to a UN deal to cut emissions.
Point 41 of the draft treaty obliges Australia to hand over an astonishing
$7 billion a year to a new and unelected global authority:[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
affix wrote:
[quote]BS will cost $7 billion a year!?
From his pocket or ours?
[/quote]
We'll give you one guess.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ipvdBnU8F8
- KRudd at his finest.
"The Labour Party is corrupt beyond redemption!"
- Labour hasbeen Mark Latham in a moment of honest clarity.
"This is the recession we had to have!"
- Paul Keating explaining why he gave Australia another Labour recession.
"Silly old bugger!"
- Well known ACTU pisspot and sometime Labour prime minister Bob Hawke
responding to a pensioner who dared ask for more.
"By 1990, no child will live in poverty"
- Bob Hawke again, desperate to win another election.
"A billion trees ..."
- Borke, pissed as a newt again.
"Well may we say 'God save the Queen' because nothing will save the governor
general!"
- Egotistical shithead and pompous fuckwit E.G. Whitlam whining about his
appointee for Governor General John Kerr.
"SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU DUMB CUNT!"
- FlangesBum on learning the truth about Labour's economic capabilities.
"I don't care what you fuckers think!"
- KRudd the KRude at his finest again.
"We'll just change it all when we get in."
- Garrett the carrott |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mauried... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:28:42 +0900, affix <affix at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
[quote]BS will cost $7 billion a year!?
From his pocket or ours?
zo nob wrote:
November 1 2009
Next month KRudd goes to Copenhagen to agree to a UN deal to cut emissions.
Point 41 of the draft treaty obliges Australia to hand over an astonishing
$7 billion a year to a new and unelected global authority:
[/quote]
You want to be thankful.
The developing nations like China and India wanted 1.5% of developed
countries GDP per annum.
Id say that any agreement at Copenhagen is deader than a Dodo.
Think about how much the US will have to hand over. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
