Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Energy Forum  »  Creationist Christopher Booker Settles AGW Issue...
Page 1 of 1    

Creationist Christopher Booker Settles AGW Issue...

Author Message
Bret Cahill...
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:17 pm
Guest
[quote]"In a startling new book, Christopher Booker reveals how a handful of
scientists, who have pushed flawed theories on global warming for
decades, now threaten to take us back to the Dark Ages"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6425269/The-real-climate-change-catas...
[/quote]
Rightards are startled by anything.

"...that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder"
and
poses a "non-existent risk" to human health[2], that "scientific
evidence to support [the] belief that inhaling other people's smoke
causes cancer simply does not exist"[3] and that there is "no proof
that BSE causes CJD in humans"[4]. He has also defended the theory of
Intelligent Design, maintaining that Darwinians "rest their case on
nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".
[5]"

Wikipedia
 
VoiceOfReason...
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:40 am
Guest
On Oct 29, 11:17 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah... at (no spam) peoplepc.com> wrote:
[quote]"In a startling new book, Christopher Booker reveals how a handful of
scientists, who have pushed flawed theories on global warming for
decades, now threaten to take us back to the Dark Ages"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6425269/The-real-climate-change-catas...

Rightards are startled by anything.

"...that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder"
and
poses a "non-existent risk" to human health[2], that "scientific
evidence to support [the] belief that inhaling other people's smoke
causes cancer simply does not exist"[3] and that there is "no proof
that BSE causes CJD in humans"[4]. He has also defended the theory of
Intelligent Design, maintaining that Darwinians "rest their case on
nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".
[5]"

Wikipedia
[/quote]
Let him go on with his inanity. If right-wing nutters die off as a
result, the remaining population will be much better off. Natural
selection at its finest.
 
Frank J...
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:17 am
Guest
On Oct 29, 11:17 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah... at (no spam) peoplepc.com> wrote:
[quote]"In a startling new book, Christopher Booker reveals how a handful of
scientists, who have pushed flawed theories on global warming for
decades, now threaten to take us back to the Dark Ages"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6425269/The-real-climate-change-catas...

Rightards are startled by anything.

"...that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder"
and
poses a "non-existent risk" to human health[2], that "scientific
evidence to support [the] belief that inhaling other people's smoke
causes cancer simply does not exist"[3] and that there is "no proof
that BSE causes CJD in humans"[4]. He has also defended the theory of
Intelligent Design, maintaining that Darwinians "rest their case on
nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".
[5]"

Wikipedia
[/quote]
Could you save me the trouble of sifting through the breathtaking
inanity, and let me know if the "creationist" has any problem with
common descent or any of the chronology of life that all "Darwinists"
and many creationists agree on?
 
Skill Fragments...
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:32 pm
Guest
Bret Cahill wrote:
[quote]"In a startling new book, Christopher Booker reveals how a handful of
scientists, who have pushed flawed theories on global warming for
decades, now threaten to take us back to the Dark Ages"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6425269/The-real-climate-change-catas...

Rightards are startled by anything.

"...that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder"
and
poses a "non-existent risk" to human health[2], that "scientific
evidence to support [the] belief that inhaling other people's smoke
causes cancer simply does not exist"[3] and that there is "no proof
that BSE causes CJD in humans"[4]. He has also defended the theory of
Intelligent Design, maintaining that Darwinians "rest their case on
nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".
[5]"

[/quote]
Plus, they have no hesitation in inventing stuff specially to startle each
other....

Thus (same paper), foaming Catholic rent-boy Damian Thompson says -- in his
usual whining and inflammatory manner -- that Richard Dawkins "calls the
[Catholic] Church 'the greatest force for evil in the world'".
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100014886/richard-dawkinss-latest-attack-on-the-catholic-church-is-vicious-and-crazy-the-man-needs-help/

And, of course, when you check the source, you find that Dawkins doesn't...
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/richard_dawkins/2009/10/give_us_your_misogynists_and_bigots.html

SF.
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:34 am