|
Guest
|
To: Durland.fish at (no spam) yale.edu, Aag1 at (no spam) columbia.edu, gary_wormser at (no spam) nymc.edu,
scientificintegrity at (no spam) ostp.gov, pkrugman at (no spam) princeton.edu,
Stanley.fish at (no spam) fiu.edu, emcsweegan at (no spam) niaid.nih.gov, afauci at (no spam) niaid.nih.gov,
SpinLyme at (no spam) yahoogroups.com, kshepard at (no spam) calea.org, fitzmas at (no spam) gmail.com,
patrick.fitzgerald at (no spam) usdoj.gov, modelt1918 at (no spam) sbcglobal.net,
jdrazen at (no spam) nejm.org, letters at (no spam) courant.com, Jgerberding at (no spam) cdc.gov,
michael.cole at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, conndcj at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, executive-
editor at (no spam) nytimes.com, managing-editor at (no spam) nytimes.com, news-
tips at (no spam) nytimes.com, bizday at (no spam) nytimes.com, foreign at (no spam) nytimes.com,
national at (no spam) nytimes.com, dvbid at (no spam) cdc.gov, brigidcallahan at (no spam) optonline.net,
trvl at (no spam) hotmail.com, illinoislyme at (no spam) aol.com, jlender at (no spam) courant.com,
tinajgarcia at (no spam) yahoo.com, jhornberger at (no spam) fff.org, thomas.carson at (no spam) usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, kurtzh at (no spam) washpost.com,
georgewill at (no spam) washpost.com, pj at (no spam) allegorypress.com,
commissioner.dcf at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, bransfield at (no spam) comcast.net,
vtsherr at (no spam) comcast.net, oca at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, freethinker at (no spam) charter.net,
scott.murphy at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, governor.rell at (no spam) po.state.ct.us,
attorney.general at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, randall.samborn at (no spam) usdoj.gov,
Robert.shiller at (no spam) yale.edu, editor at (no spam) greenwich-post.com,
harold.koh at (no spam) yale.edu, sedmonds at (no spam) nswbc.org, rrmcgovern at (no spam) aol.com,
frich at (no spam) nytimes.com, dprice at (no spam) stmartin.edu
Cc: francam at (no spam) ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad at (no spam) president.ir,
eugenerobinson at (no spam) washpost.com, afauci at (no spam) niaid.nih.gov,
bmiller at (no spam) newstimes.com, trvl at (no spam) hotmail.com, rastro18 at (no spam) aol.com,
billcurryct at (no spam) gmail.com, amcguigan at (no spam) rms-law.com, rjmurzyn at (no spam) aol.com,
paulcraigroberts at (no spam) yahoo.com, sidney_blumenthal at (no spam) yahoo.com,
criminal.division at (no spam) usdoj.gov, karla.dobinski at (no spam) usdoj.gov,
christopher.christie at (no spam) usdoj.gov, richard.Levin at (no spam) yale.edu,
harold.koh at (no spam) yale.edu, james.phillips at (no spam) yale.edu, inquire at (no spam) aldf.com,
lyme at (no spam) idsociety.org, meganmcardle at (no spam) theatlantic.com,
bob.drogin at (no spam) latimes.com
Subject: Gardisil doesn't work says researcher involved in trials
(Guv. Rell does not care)
Date: Oct 28, 2009 8:01 AM
"One big open experiment
on children, where there is no
actual need for this vaccine."
ARTICLE BELOW
--------------------------
This is just like all the rest of them
(vaccines) except LYMErix, which was
known to not work in 1995:
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6045804.PN..&OS=PN/6045804&RS=PN/6045804
"Additional uncertainty may arise if the vaccines are not completely
protective; vaccinated patients with multisystem complaints
characteristic of later presentations of Lyme disease may be
difficult to distinguish from patients with vaccine failure."
1995: LYMErix^^^disease and Lyme
disease are instinguishable, but
that wasn't a clue to these Yalie
tards (Yale's Robert Schoen
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm )
because *money* was the goal and
not scientific facts. They *KNEW,*
but they did not care that LYMErix
didn't work. They already had a plan
to how to deal with LYMErix and
Lyme victims:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MUNCHAUSENS.htm
Blame the Parents. ^^^ Say they're poisoning
their children.
LYMErix used on kids anyway, by UConn
and Yale:
http://www.actionlyme.org/UCONNS_ABUSE_OF_CZECH_CHILDREN.htm
They ^^ don't care how many kids
they kill or families they destroy:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MUNCHAUSENS.htm
On the left, ^^^ is the disease everyone suffers.
On the right, are instructions to report parents
to duh DCF to have their sick children removed
and placed with pediatric brain damagers
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
pediatric Abu-Ghraibers, and pediatric
penis-biters:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
I know that the Connecticut Republican
Governor does not care about children,
because her first concern is image and money.
She only cares about how the rich people are
feeling today  )) She also thinks the banksters
do a good and necessary job for this country.
:)))
And I am not kidding or exaggerating because
I heard about it yesterday on the phone
from her office.
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
=========================
http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/top_stories/doc4ae4b76d07e16766677720.txt
Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell
Harper: Controversal Drug Will Do Little To Reduce Cervical Cancer
Rates
By Susan Brinkmann, For The Bulletin
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human
papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the
controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates
and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine,
there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15.
Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research
Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an
address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination
which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk
was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away
convinced the vaccine should not be received.
“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of
adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical
cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,”
said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research
Institute.
Dr. Harper began her remarks by explaining that 70 percent of all HPV
infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. Within
two years, the number climbs to 90 percent. Of the remaining 10
percent of HPV infections, only half will develop into cervical
cancer, which leaves little need for the vaccine.
She went on to surprise the audience by stating that the incidence of
cervical cancer in the U.S. is already so low that “even if we get the
vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of
cervical cancer in the US.”
There will be no decrease in cervical cancer until at least 70 percent
of the population is vaccinated, and even then, the decrease will be
minimal.
Apparently, conventional treatment and preventative measures are
already cutting the cervical cancer rate by four percent a year. At
this rate, in 60 years, there will be a 91.4 percent decline just with
current treatment. Even if 70 percent of women get the shot and
required boosters over the same time period, which is highly unlikely,
Harper says Gardasil still could not claim to do as much as
traditional care is already doing.
Dr. Harper, who also serves as a consultant to the World Health
Organization, further undercut the case for mass vaccination by saying
that “four out of five women with cervical cancer are in developing
countries.”
Ms. Robinson said she could not help but wonder, “If this is the case,
then why vaccinate at all? But from the murmurs of the doctors in the
audience, it was apparent that the same thought was occurring to
them.”
However, at this point, Dr. Harper dropped an even bigger bombshell on
the audience when she announced that, “There have been no efficacy
trials in girls under 15 years.”
Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, studied only a small group of
girls under 16 who had been vaccinated, but did not follow them long
enough to conclude sufficient presence of effective HPV antibodies.
This is not the first time Dr. Harper revealed the fact that Merck
never tested Gardasil for safety in young girls. During a 2007
interview with KPC News.com, she said giving the vaccine to girls as
young as 11 years-old “is a great big public health experiment.”
At the time, which was at the height of Merck’s controversial drive to
have the vaccine mandated in schools, Dr. Harper remained steadfastly
opposed to the idea and said she had been trying for months to
convince major television and print media about her concerns, “but no
one will print it.”
“It is silly to mandate vaccination of 11 to 12 year old girls,” she
said at the time. “There also is not enough evidence gathered on side
effects to know that safety is not an issue.”
When asked why she was speaking out, she said: “I want to be able to
sleep with myself when I go to bed at night.”
Since the drug’s introduction in 2006, the public has been learning
many of these facts the hard way. To date, 15,037 girls have
officially reported adverse side effects from Gardasil to the Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These adverse reactions
include Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots,
brain inflammation and many others. The CDC acknowledges that there
have been 44 reported deaths.
Dr. Harper also participated in the research on Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s
version of the drug, Cervarix, currently in use in the UK but not yet
approved here. Since the government began administering the vaccine to
school-aged girls last year, more than 2,000 patients reported some
kind of adverse reaction including nausea, dizziness, blurred vision,
convulsions, seizures and hyperventilation. Several reported multiple
reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total. The
most tragic case involved a 14 year-old girl who dropped dead in the
corridor of her school an hour after receiving the vaccination.
The outspoken researcher also weighed in last month on a report
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that
raised questions about the safety of the vaccine, saying bluntly: "The
rate of serious adverse events is greater than the incidence rate of
cervical cancer."
Ms. Robinson said she respects Dr. Harper’s candor. “I think she’s a
scientist, a researcher, and she’s genuine enough a scientist to be
open about the risks. I respect that in her.”
However, she failed to make the case for Gardasil. “For me, it was
hard to resist the conclusion that Gardasil does almost nothing for
the health of American women.”
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci |
|
|
