 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » 2 - 6 Signs of Error in Astrology... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Academic Zodiac 22 Zodiacal Constellations 16 Eastern... |
 Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The standard error in astrology is two to six signs. This means that
you have most probably been fooled not by one but by two natal signs.
This is of course but the beginning of a mountain of errors that were
corrected by zodiacal reformation.
The tropical astrologers are even more sincere than the sidereal ones
since they will never claim that they work with your natal sky at all.
In fact, they have no idea of your true natal sky, much as they have
no idea of their own.
The sidereal astrologers will on the other hand claim that they
represent the stars which they do not, since they distort your natal
skies more or less like tropical astrologers do.
http://lulu.com/astrology |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Casanova... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:34:41 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Academic Zodiac 22
Zodiacal Constellations 16 Eastern Ascednants
<wirelass at (no spam) gmail.com>:
[quote]The standard error in astrology is two to six signs.
[/quote]
The standard error in astrology is imagining that it's more
than a game, and that it has any relevance to reality.
[quote]This means that
you have most probably been fooled not by one but by two natal signs.
This is of course but the beginning of a mountain of errors that were
corrected by zodiacal reformation.
The tropical astrologers are even more sincere than the sidereal ones
since they will never claim that they work with your natal sky at all.
In fact, they have no idea of your true natal sky, much as they have
no idea of their own.
The sidereal astrologers will on the other hand claim that they
represent the stars which they do not, since they distort your natal
skies more or less like tropical astrologers do.
http://lulu.com/astrology
--[/quote]
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4AE4C778.3E3A at (no spam) earthlink.net:
[quote]Academic Zodiac 22 Zodiacal Constellations 16 Eastern Ascednants
wrote:
The standard error in astrology is two to six signs. This means that
you have most probably been fooled not by one but by two natal signs.
This is of course but the beginning of a mountain of errors that were
corrected by zodiacal reformation.
The tropical astrologers are even more sincere than the sidereal ones
since they will never claim that they work with your natal sky at
all. In fact, they have no idea of your true natal sky, much as they
have no idea of their own.
The sidereal astrologers will on the other hand claim that they
represent the stars which they do not, since they distort your natal
skies more or less like tropical astrologers do.
http://lulu.com/astrology
And Lulu is Kuku.
[/quote]
k00kfight!
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Interesting how you abusers try to make things a "chuckle", but you
obsess over the chuckle for 7 years." - Ed the numerically-challenged. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Officer... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:34:41 -0700 (PDT), in alt.astrology, Academic
Zodiac 22 Zodiacal Constellations 16 Eastern Ascednants
<wirelass at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]The standard error in astrology is two to six signs. This means that
you have most probably been fooled not by one but by two natal signs.
This is of course but the beginning of a mountain of errors that were
corrected by zodiacal reformation.
The tropical astrologers are even more sincere than the sidereal ones
since they will never claim that they work with your natal sky at all.
In fact, they have no idea of your true natal sky, much as they have
no idea of their own.
The sidereal astrologers will on the other hand claim that they
represent the stars which they do not, since they distort your natal
skies more or less like tropical astrologers do.
http://lulu.com/astrology
[/quote]
If there was a god he would be laughing at you, Claud.
Two to six signs means the horoscope is in error. +/- 2 to 6 signs,
is like saying to a man, you are headed in the right direction + or -
180 degrees.
How stupid do you think people are.
But then you are talking about people that believe in astrology. They
are very stupid.
--
Ak'toh'di |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:55 pm
|
|