Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Space - Shuttle Forum  »  Flying STS 335...
Page 1 of 1    

Flying STS 335...

Author Message
Albert Blauensteiner...
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:22 am
Guest
Why not flying STS 335 anyway? If a LON 335 would be performed as a rescue
flight we would have the same situation: No further LON available. Taking
the enhanced performance of the recent ETs, the low overall risc and the
possibility to save a crew of two in a worst scenario by a soyuz launched
with only one astronaut, NASA could use existing resources for an additional
last mission.

Albert
 
Jorge R. Frank...
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:54 pm
Guest
Albert Blauensteiner wrote:
[quote]Why not flying STS 335 anyway? If a LON 335 would be performed as a
rescue flight we would have the same situation: No further LON
available. Taking the enhanced performance of the recent ETs, the low
overall risc and the possibility to save a crew of two in a worst
scenario by a soyuz launched with only one astronaut, NASA could use
existing resources for an additional last mission.
[/quote]
335 may fly (if it flies for a non-LON scenario, it will be renumbered
135), but it will never fly with a crew of two. Four, minimum.
 
snidely...
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:08 pm
Guest
On Oct 22, 6:54 pm, "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfr... at (no spam) ibm-pc.borg> wrote:
[quote]Albert Blauensteiner wrote:
Why not flying STS 335 anyway? If a LON 335 would be performed as a
rescue flight we would have the same situation: No further LON
available. Taking the enhanced performance of the recent ETs, the low
overall risc and the possibility to save a crew of two in a worst
scenario by a soyuz launched with only one astronaut, NASA could use
existing resources for an additional last mission.

335 may fly (if it flies for a non-LON scenario, it will be renumbered
135), but it will never fly with a crew of two. Four, minimum.
[/quote]
Interesting. One to keep our eye on; thanks.

/dps
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:49 am