| Science Forum Index » Astro Forum » Does the 'Gravitational Field' really exist?... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| bkh99... |
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Does the 'Gravitational Field' really exist?
In the following discussion I am going to lay out the case that what
has been called ‘the fourth force field of the universe' which is ‘the
gravitational field' is a theoretical scientific fiction, which is to
say that the ‘gravitational field' does not exist. Anyone who is
familiar with problems in science over the course of the 20th century
would know that the gravitational force field is sitting in isolation
upon some shelf awaiting a solution which would somehow make this
field consistent with Quantum Mechanics (the mathematics produces a
kind of infinite loop which cannot be resolved using such techniques
as ‘renormalization'). If the gravitational field is a scientific
fiction then it follows from this that the endless fruitless search
for a theory of ‘Quantum Gravity' is just a wild goose chase.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/page2/gravity_fiction.html
A summary of the Unified Field Theory
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/new_physics.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 18, 3:23 pm, bkh99 <b... at (no spam) sasktel.net> wrote:
[quote]Does the 'Gravitational Field' really exist?
In the following discussion I am going to lay out the case that what
has been called ‘the fourth force field of the universe' which is ‘the
gravitational field' is a theoretical scientific fiction, which is to
say that the ‘gravitational field' does not exist. Anyone who is
familiar with problems in science over the course of the 20th century
would know that the gravitational force field is sitting in isolation
upon some shelf awaiting a solution which would somehow make this
field consistent with Quantum Mechanics (the mathematics produces a
kind of infinite loop which cannot be resolved using such techniques
as ‘renormalization'). If the gravitational field is a scientific
fiction then it follows from this that the endless fruitless search
for a theory of ‘Quantum Gravity' is just a wild goose chase.
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/page2/gravity_fiction.html
A summary of the Unified Field Theoryhttp://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/new_physics.html
[/quote]
If nothing else, the force of gravity is so weak that it's hardly
worth mentioning, and yet it's what we think we understand without
really knowing how gravity works its magic.
A "Unified Field Theory" would be nice, because that should better
explain how a planet or a moon can become associated with another body
other than whatever was originally created at the exact same time and
place.
Removing the "matter based field" of gravity would greatly help, even
though a perceived force of gravity might still coexist in much the
same as secondary/recoil photons exist.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| gb... |
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The question is if the gravitational field is something that is
emitted or is something static with warps as Einstein defined it, if
it really exists or has no substance in terms of fields while they are
called fields?
I vote that they are fields that are emitted, but then one would deny
Einstein's physics? Tesla showed that the gravitational field exists,
but his work from the late 19th Century ended up classified through
most of the 20th Century by the USA.
Or maybe I am not making sense for your question. The fourth force,
you mean fourth dimension, but attributing the force is a smart
direction.
There is something darker lurking than Darth Vader in the force of the
dark side, maybe it is the coal beast. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|