i was wondering if anyone has seen or heard of any n. american
projectile points similar in style to the artifact found at the monte
verde site in chile. the point found in chile is very bi-convex and is
extremely unique. i find it odd that more was not said in the site
monograph regarding the point. i suppose that dillehay lacked the
ability to place the artifact in context so he chose to accentuate the
other evidence of his findings. any info or comments would be welcome

now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

"Lee Olsen" wrote...
now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

excuse me?

"Tedd Jacobs" wrote...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

excuse me?

Lets see if I have enough circumstantial evidence here to get this
into court.

First, newbie posts entire body of message in lower case. Now it is
well known that a keyboard could have a sticky key that could result
in all lower case, but since the title is in all caps shows the
pseud's keyboard is working properly. It is also well known that Tedd
has been challenged on another thread about his persistent and
continual use of lower case, so we know Tedd can't use the old stuck
key excuse.

Second, the question that the pseud raised is oddly out of context on
sci-anthro. Not that the question is a bad one, actually it is a very
good one. Too good in fact for this particular list. A detailed
discussion of lithic analysis would be better answered on a list where
the specialists in this type of thing hang out.

Third, the Monte Verde monograph doesn't seem like subject the average
person on the street would be reading, no, more like required reading
in some anthro class. The use of lower case suggests the pseud is not
a professional yet. This post seems more middle of the road----- in
keeping with a student of archaeology that seldom caps and doesn't
know what list to ask a question of this nature, as a pro would.

I'm sure a defense attorney would argue that one of Tedd's enemies is
simply trying to frame him, why wasn't this question cross posted to
the usual lists where they hang out? Well, I guess I'll just let the
judge decide the matter.

"Lee Olsen" wrote...
"Tedd Jacobs" wrote...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

excuse me?

Lets see if I have enough circumstantial evidence here to get this
into court.

First, newbie posts entire body of message in lower case. Now it is
well known that a keyboard could have a sticky key that could result
in all lower case, but since the title is in all caps shows the
pseud's keyboard is working properly. It is also well known that Tedd
has been challenged on another thread about his persistent and
continual use of lower case, so we know Tedd can't use the old stuck
key excuse.

Second, the question that the pseud raised is oddly out of context on
sci-anthro. Not that the question is a bad one, actually it is a very
good one. Too good in fact for this particular list. A detailed
discussion of lithic analysis would be better answered on a list where
the specialists in this type of thing hang out.

Third, the Monte Verde monograph doesn't seem like subject the average
person on the street would be reading, no, more like required reading
in some anthro class. The use of lower case suggests the pseud is not
a professional yet. This post seems more middle of the road----- in
keeping with a student of archaeology that seldom caps and doesn't
know what list to ask a question of this nature, as a pro would.

I'm sure a defense attorney would argue that one of Tedd's enemies is
simply trying to frame him, why wasn't this question cross posted to
the usual lists where they hang out? Well, I guess I'll just let the
judge decide the matter.

you are quite the sad individual lee, and progressively deteriorating.

"Tedd Jacobs" <Jacobs@mail.boisestate.edu> wrote in message news:<jN%Hb.549$n2.38090@news.uswest.net>...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
"Tedd Jacobs" wrote...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

excuse me?

Lets see if I have enough circumstantial evidence here to get this
into court.

First, newbie posts entire body of message in lower case. Now it is
well known that a keyboard could have a sticky key that could result
in all lower case, but since the title is in all caps shows the
pseud's keyboard is working properly. It is also well known that Tedd
has been challenged on another thread about his persistent and
continual use of lower case, so we know Tedd can't use the old stuck
key excuse.

Second, the question that the pseud raised is oddly out of context on
sci-anthro. Not that the question is a bad one, actually it is a very
good one. Too good in fact for this particular list. A detailed
discussion of lithic analysis would be better answered on a list where
the specialists in this type of thing hang out.

Third, the Monte Verde monograph doesn't seem like subject the average
person on the street would be reading, no, more like required reading
in some anthro class. The use of lower case suggests the pseud is not
a professional yet. This post seems more middle of the road----- in
keeping with a student of archaeology that seldom caps and doesn't
know what list to ask a question of this nature, as a pro would.

I'm sure a defense attorney would argue that one of Tedd's enemies is
simply trying to frame him, why wasn't this question cross posted to
the usual lists where they hang out? Well, I guess I'll just let the
judge decide the matter.

you are quite the sad individual lee, and progressively deteriorating.

As you know, a good hypothesis must predict something. My lower-case
hypothesis predicted that the Albertsons Library copy of Monte Verde
vol 2 should be checked out right now. It is on the shelf, so I will
temporarily rescind my accusation....but just don't leave town.

Think I'm deteriorating huh? My hypothesis also predicts Boise State
will finish at least 14th or 13th in the final polls. Top that.

paleocity@hotmail.com (Lee Olsen) wrote in message news:<40a73547.0312302126.4a22a04d@posting.google.com>...
"Tedd Jacobs" <Jacobs@mail.boisestate.edu> wrote in message news:<jN%Hb.549$n2.38090@news.uswest.net>...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
"Tedd Jacobs" wrote...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

excuse me?

Lets see if I have enough circumstantial evidence here to get this
into court.

First, newbie posts entire body of message in lower case. Now it is
well known that a keyboard could have a sticky key that could result
in all lower case, but since the title is in all caps shows the
pseud's keyboard is working properly. It is also well known that Tedd
has been challenged on another thread about his persistent and
continual use of lower case, so we know Tedd can't use the old stuck
key excuse.

Second, the question that the pseud raised is oddly out of context on
sci-anthro. Not that the question is a bad one, actually it is a very
good one. Too good in fact for this particular list. A detailed
discussion of lithic analysis would be better answered on a list where
the specialists in this type of thing hang out.

Third, the Monte Verde monograph doesn't seem like subject the average
person on the street would be reading, no, more like required reading
in some anthro class. The use of lower case suggests the pseud is not
a professional yet. This post seems more middle of the road----- in
keeping with a student of archaeology that seldom caps and doesn't
know what list to ask a question of this nature, as a pro would.

I'm sure a defense attorney would argue that one of Tedd's enemies is
simply trying to frame him, why wasn't this question cross posted to
the usual lists where they hang out? Well, I guess I'll just let the
judge decide the matter.

you are quite the sad individual lee, and progressively deteriorating.

As you know, a good hypothesis must predict something. My lower-case
hypothesis predicted that the Albertsons Library copy of Monte Verde
vol 2 should be checked out right now. It is on the shelf, so I will
temporarily rescind my accusation....but just don't leave town.

Think I'm deteriorating huh? My hypothesis also predicts Boise State
will finish at least 14th or 13th in the final polls. Top that.

hmmmmmmmmmmmm. i thought this was anthropolgy, not psychology.

dont
need some assholes

battlin it out on my post.

who gives a fuck what
case my letters are in?

i posted this to attempt to obtain some information and insight.

please leave replies to this post within that context.

by the way the
monograph cost me $200.00 dollars

you asswhipe.

MOKISLAB@HOTMAIL.COM (MOKISLAB) wrote in message news:<64d5b751.0312310856.3c052e9@posting.google.com>...
paleocity@hotmail.com (Lee Olsen) wrote in message news:<40a73547.0312302126.4a22a04d@posting.google.com>...
"Tedd Jacobs" <Jacobs@mail.boisestate.edu> wrote in message news:<jN%Hb.549$n2.38090@news.uswest.net>...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
"Tedd Jacobs" wrote...
"Lee Olsen" wrote...
now why do i suspect this is tedd with a new moniker?

excuse me?

Lets see if I have enough circumstantial evidence here to get this
into court.

First, newbie posts entire body of message in lower case. Now it is
well known that a keyboard could have a sticky key that could result
in all lower case, but since the title is in all caps shows the
pseud's keyboard is working properly. It is also well known that Tedd
has been challenged on another thread about his persistent and
continual use of lower case, so we know Tedd can't use the old stuck
key excuse.

Second, the question that the pseud raised is oddly out of context on
sci-anthro. Not that the question is a bad one, actually it is a very
good one. Too good in fact for this particular list. A detailed
discussion of lithic analysis would be better answered on a list where
the specialists in this type of thing hang out.

Third, the Monte Verde monograph doesn't seem like subject the average
person on the street would be reading, no, more like required reading
in some anthro class. The use of lower case suggests the pseud is not
a professional yet. This post seems more middle of the road----- in
keeping with a student of archaeology that seldom caps and doesn't
know what list to ask a question of this nature, as a pro would.

I'm sure a defense attorney would argue that one of Tedd's enemies is
simply trying to frame him, why wasn't this question cross posted to
the usual lists where they hang out? Well, I guess I'll just let the
judge decide the matter.

you are quite the sad individual lee, and progressively deteriorating.

As you know, a good hypothesis must predict something. My lower-case
hypothesis predicted that the Albertsons Library copy of Monte Verde
vol 2 should be checked out right now. It is on the shelf, so I will
temporarily rescind my accusation....but just don't leave town.

Think I'm deteriorating huh? My hypothesis also predicts Boise State
will finish at least 14th or 13th in the final polls. Top that.

hmmmmmmmmmmmm. i thought this was anthropolgy, not psychology.

When a person posts the title and his name in all caps, the psychology
is plain enough, it spells troll.

dont
need some assholes

Do not blame Tedd for something I instigated.

battlin it out on my post.

Subjects on public, unmoderated forums tend to drift----live with it.

who gives a fuck what
case my letters are in?

Judging by the overwhelming response to your original question, I'd
say the very people who could answer the question.

i posted this to attempt to obtain some information and insight.

As above, it's pretty hard to take someone seriously that rudely
shouts title and name, then posts his question in all lower case.

please leave replies to this post within that context.

I would bet that if you went over to Palanth and re-asked the question
properly with correct case, with your full name correctly cased (so as
you don't come off sounding like a 13-year-old troll), I would be
surprised if you didn't get some of that information and insight.

by the way the
monograph cost me $200.00 dollars

You have my sincere condolences.

you asswhipe.

Ninth-grade lingo, is that the best you can do?

MOKISLAB wrote

your condescencion is most welcome. i did ask that replies be limited
to the context of my post.i believe anyone with any real knowledge or
insight to the subject would likely care less about the case of my
letters.

Do a lithic technology search on sci.anthro. Your question is on the
wrong list. The people that can give you a believable answer to your
original question, seldom if ever, hang out here.
They can be found on moderated lists, and trust me, they *never* post
in all lower case on such lists. The moderator of such a list would
simply send your lower case question back or trash can it.

i do appreciate the tip and will check out palanth....

Meanwhile I thought of another idea. Michael Collins (Associate
Director of the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory at the
University of Texas at Austin)
did the lithic studies for your monograph. He is approachable, and
might answer your question. Five bucks says you better use correct
caps if are going to have any chance at all of getting a reply from
him.

by the
way the monograph cost me $200.00 dollars you portentous,supercilious
asswhipe. hows that?

Much better, but rest assured, I've been called a lot worse in my day.
Thank you sir.

MOKISLAB wrote

your condescencion is most welcome. i did ask that replies be limited
to the context of my post.i believe anyone with any real knowledge or
insight to the subject would likely care less about the case of my
letters.

Do a lithic technology search on sci.anthro. Your question is on the
wrong list. The people that can give you a believable answer to your
original question, seldom if ever, hang out here.
They can be found on moderated lists, and trust me, they *never* post
in all lower case on such lists. The moderator of such a list would
simply send your lower case question back or trash can it.

i do appreciate the tip and will check out palanth....

Meanwhile I thought of another idea. Michael Collins (Associate
Director of the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory at the
University of Texas at Austin)
did the lithic studies for your monograph. He is approachable, and
might answer your question. Five bucks says you better use correct
caps if are going to have any chance at all of getting a reply from
him.

by the
way the monograph cost me $200.00 dollars you portentous,supercilious
asswhipe. hows that?

Much better, but rest assured, I've been called a lot worse in my day.
Thank you sir.