 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Geology Forum » The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth ” /... |
|
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| BradGuth... |
 Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 1, 5:39 pm, "David Staup" <dst... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote:d6aef4de8d]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2577fde0-ae9a-4b31-a5b1-8c3f4596c217 at (no spam) u38g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 1, 4:48 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
This topic is about "Shading The Earth", not "shading the Ear th" as
having been revised by mainstream media outsiders, so that my version
of this topic or concept wouldn't so easily show, kind of proves who's
really in charge of what regular folks get to read.
Shading The Earth, except using our Selene/moon.
The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” /BradGuth
"Shading The Earth"Guth
"Shading The Earth"BradGuth
"Shading The Earth" National Geographic
There would still be an ocean tide, except only as an exact 12 hour
period and never changing except for that caused by the seasonal tilt
of Earth. These ocean tides might even be as much as roughly half of
what we currently have to deal with. Isn't that good, or what?
~ BG
there are five positions in space where a third body, of comparatively
negligible mass, could be placed which would then maintain its position
relative to the two massive bodies.
do you know what negligible means?
twobc (total waste of brain cells) guth
[/quote:d6aef4de8d]
DO you know what interactive station-keeping means? and how little
energy or reactive force is required for utilizing Earth L1?
Obviously you know damn little if anything that matters, and you care
not what happens to Earth.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 2, 3:57 pm, "David Staup" <dst... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote:a8d3524d43]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:19862862-957e-4823-a064-255b418fe91d at (no spam) u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 1, 5:39 pm, "David Staup" <dst... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
~ BG
Snip total bs
there are five positions in space where a third body, of comparatively
negligible mass, could be placed which would then maintain its position
relative to the two massive bodies.
do you know what negligible means?
twobc (total waste of brain cells) guth
DO you know what interactive station-keeping means? and how little
energy or reactive force is required for utilizing Earth L1?
Obviously you know damn little if anything that matters, and you care
not what happens to Earth.
~ BG
I do know that F=MA do you ?
even assuming your silly ass station keeping idea didnt require that
knowledge for sure getting the moon to the L1 point is beyond even your
wizardly powers.
[/quote:a8d3524d43]
Why did you intentionally cut those other newsgroups?
You underestimate my abilities. I plan on future generations pulling
it there, using mostly its own easily accessible mass. My wizardly
tethers of <490 GPa carbonado fibers, along with a few thousand or
million tonnes of lunar basalt, should more than do the trick. Best
you don't nitpick those small details.
[quote:a8d3524d43]
you really need to start using all six of those neurons you have. maybe then
you wouldn't make such a fool of yourself.
[/quote:a8d3524d43]
That's apparently 6 more deductive capable neurons than you've got of
parrot neurons to spare.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:64041bd2da]Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
[/quote:64041bd2da]
Apparently our inert (meaning passive) and otherwise highly reflective
moon as recorded by those Apollo missions has different laws of
physics to deal with.
Thus far the 0.1% of our LRO science that we get to see, is as good as
it's ever going to get, and too bad that any 3.5% solar shade by way
of utilizing our moon isn't in the cards.
BTW, where exactly did all those dark and heavy minerals plus loads of
cosmic deposits go? (most of which should have been UV reactive,
exactly as here on Earth)
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:04 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:e4e8c711f6]Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
[/quote:e4e8c711f6]
Relocating our moon is daunting but by no means insurmountable,
especially if given a century in order to literally pull this one off.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:24 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 14, 12:04 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:ad83261f33]On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
Relocating our moon is daunting but by no means insurmountable,
especially if given a century in order to literally pull this one off.
~ BG
[/quote:ad83261f33]
Notice how it's only the "alt.astronomy" Jews like rabbi Saul Levy and
other pretenders (aka spooks, moles and brown-nosed clowns) that are
opposed to this.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:688cda6e3b]Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
[/quote:688cda6e3b]
I’m not insisting that artificial global shading by way of deploying
thousands of enormous disks isn’t viable, as well as perhaps by having
recycled and utilized those hundreds of millions of AOL and other
internet provider CDs alone could have easily accomplished the
reflective trick of shading us, as of more than a decade ago.
However, there’s simply more all around benefit to having our Selene/
moon relocated, out to Earth L1.
Our moon/Selene would provide <3.5% global shade, and that moon
would still be providing a sufficient tidal boost over that of having
just our solar generated tide to work with, and it’s not as though
human life plus the vast biodiversity as we know it would suddenly
fail to adapt and survive. In fact, with a somewhat cooler Earth and
far less geophysical trauma to contend with, as well as less solar and
moon radiation of the bad kind for our frail DNA to deal with, by
rights this should greatly improve the long-term biodiversity as well
as stabilizing the physical aspects of our environment.
Where’s this not a perfect win-win?
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
btw; Relocating our moon out to Earth L1 and interactively keeping it
there is certainly a daunting task, but it's not nearly as
insurmountable as you might think. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 1, 5:39 pm, "David Staup" <dst... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote:0124df72e0]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2577fde0-ae9a-4b31-a5b1-8c3f4596c217 at (no spam) u38g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 1, 4:48 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
This topic is about "Shading The Earth", not "shading the Ear th" as
having been revised by mainstream media outsiders, so that my version
of this topic or concept wouldn't so easily show, kind of proves who's
really in charge of what regular folks get to read.
Shading The Earth, except using our Selene/moon.
The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” /BradGuth
"Shading The Earth"Guth
"Shading The Earth"BradGuth
"Shading The Earth" National Geographic
There would still be an ocean tide, except only as an exact 12 hour
period and never changing except for that caused by the seasonal tilt
of Earth. These ocean tides might even be as much as roughly half of
what we currently have to deal with. Isn't that good, or what?
~ BG
there are five positions in space where a third body, of comparatively
negligible mass, could be placed which would then maintain its position
relative to the two massive bodies.
do you know what negligible means?
twobc (total waste of brain cells) guth
[/quote:0124df72e0]
Unlike your near worthless parrot reply of essentially mainstream
status quo of continued obfuscation, denial and that do nothing
mindset, at least my ideas are worth accomplishing for loads of valid
reasons besides shading Earth <3.5%.
As it is, our Selene/moon hasn't been doing us any good whatsoever.
If anything it's only adding some portion of its 2e20 N/sec in the
form of thermal, gamma, sodium and loads of physical trauma to an
already bad environment situation that's only getting worse.
Obviously you don't seem to care how badly Earth and all of what's
left of our biodiversity suffers. (you must be another kosher pretend-
Atheist, or perhaps something worse)
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 28, 9:37 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:1ba61e77bf]On Sep 1, 5:39 pm, "David Staup" <dst... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2577fde0-ae9a-4b31-a5b1-8c3f4596c217 at (no spam) u38g2000pro.googlegroups.com....
On Sep 1, 4:48 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 29, 12:35 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Who is kidding who? (apparently I’m not alone with my wizardly
advanced/weird ideas)
As a very nicely eyecandy hyped topic within a very spendy National
Geographic publication, and as such sounds and looks exactly along the
lines of what my relocating of our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 is all
about, except my idea is in so many ways a whole lot better.
However “When Yellowstone Explodes” (exposing Warhol’s “lake of fire”)
it’s not hardly going to matter, as even the shading potential of
creating <3.5% solar isolation via having our Selene/moon parked
interactively within the halo station-keeping zone of our L1 may not
be sufficient.
Not to mention those ever increasing meteor/asteroid encounters
that’ll eventually become impacts, and the ever increasing volcanic
and geothermal venting that’s continually adding serious insult to
those of our artificial methods of global polluting, dimming and of
course the expediting of our hydrocarbon depletion and ultimately
affordable energy demise, mostly unfortunate for the rich and powerful
because we’ll run ourselves out of such burnable stuff to hoard and
profiteer at, whereas not even hard rock mining for uranium and
thorium is going to save our global warming day of reckoning that’s
already gotten past the point of no return, unless WWIII manages to
thin the herd by 90%.
BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet”
BTW; volcanic and geothermal activity is up by nearly 33% from just a
few decades or possibly a century ago, though somewhat exponentially
become greater as of most recently. Is Earth about ready to explode?
(I don’t think so, but then we so often get to review only 0.1% of
public funded science, so there’s really no telling). Perhaps Steven
Chu had better extract as much geothermal energy as possible before
that option falls off the table, or rather into the “lake of fire”.
This topic is about "Shading The Earth", not "shading the Ear th" as
having been revised by mainstream media outsiders, so that my version
of this topic or concept wouldn't so easily show, kind of proves who's
really in charge of what regular folks get to read.
Shading The Earth, except using our Selene/moon.
The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” /BradGuth
"Shading The Earth"Guth
"Shading The Earth"BradGuth
"Shading The Earth" National Geographic
There would still be an ocean tide, except only as an exact 12 hour
period and never changing except for that caused by the seasonal tilt
of Earth. These ocean tides might even be as much as roughly half of
what we currently have to deal with. Isn't that good, or what?
~ BG
there are five positions in space where a third body, of comparatively
negligible mass, could be placed which would then maintain its position
relative to the two massive bodies.
do you know what negligible means?
twobc (total waste of brain cells)guth
Unlike your near worthless parrot reply of essentially mainstream
status quo of continued obfuscation, denial and that do nothing
mindset, at least my ideas are worth accomplishing for loads of valid
reasons besides shading Earth <3.5%.
As it is, our Selene/moon hasn't been doing us any good whatsoever.
If anything it's only adding some portion of its 2e20 N/sec in the
form of thermal, gamma, sodium and loads of physical trauma to an
already bad environment situation that's only getting worse.
Obviously you don't seem to care how badly Earth and all of what's
left of our biodiversity suffers. (you must be another kosher pretend-
Atheist, or perhaps something worse)
~ BG
[/quote:1ba61e77bf]
The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” / Brad Guth (Shading
The Earth with our moon) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:48 am
|
|