Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Philosophy Forum  »  Sets and numbers
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
John Jones
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 3:16 pm
Guest
The set of a mathematical function for making 'numbers' is a set, but this
set has no numbers!

JJ
Immortalist
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 4:10 pm
Guest
"John Jones" <john.jones53@tesco.net> wrote in message
news:bs5gm9$or4$9@titan.btinternet.com...
Quote:
The set of a mathematical function for making 'numbers' is a set, but this
set has no numbers!


It was "scaffoulded" into existence by naivity, then it got a life!

It showed itself as necessity which we gladly populated with numbers for
that scale.

The chaperone or shoehorn are temporary training wheels discarded after
riding is achieved or results are returned.

But life must be a coach potato if it insists on so much setting.

Quote:
JJ

John Jones
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:04 pm
Guest
The set has no numbers because it is not counted, even though its members
were numerals.
"Immortalist" <Reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vueni2m8llo0e4@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:

"John Jones" <john.jones53@tesco.net> wrote in message
news:bs5gm9$or4$9@titan.btinternet.com...
The set of a mathematical function for making 'numbers' is a set, but
this
set has no numbers!


It was "scaffoulded" into existence by naivity, then it got a life!

It showed itself as necessity which we gladly populated with numbers for
that scale.

The chaperone or shoehorn are temporary training wheels discarded after
riding is achieved or results are returned.

But life must be a coach potato if it insists on so much setting.

JJ



 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:02 am