| Science Forum Index » Miscelaneous » Most Useless Phrase in the Political Lexicon: "Peer... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Ouroboros Rex... |
 Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eric Gisin wrote:
[quote:139e2cf19e]All the serious climate science blogs have articles debunking the
"peer review" that alarmists just love to quote.
[/quote:139e2cf19e]
That must be why you are quoting a denialist lie mill instead. lol
See next post.
[quote:139e2cf19e]
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/paging-captain-renault-research-journal-out-for-access-fees-5517
Paging Captain Renault - Research Journal Out for Access Fees
June 10, 2009, 13:58:28 | David Bruggeman
The Scientist is the source of our Casablanca flashback, with its
report that an open access journal published by Bentham was willing
to publish a 'nonsense' paper that supposedly passed peer review.
[/quote:139e2cf19e]
Now where will denialists post their nonsense papers? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ouroboros Rex... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eric Gisin wrote:
[quote:8406de0a49]All the foaming-at-the-mouth trolls who use these tactics put up your
hand!
http://www.climate-skeptic.com
[/quote:8406de0a49]
Sorry, k00ksite. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eric Gisin... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Ouroboros Rex" <its at (no spam) casual.com> wrote in message news:h0r5a0016lj at (no spam) news3.newsguy.com...
[quote:d05a7d43d3]Eric Gisin wrote:
All the serious climate science blogs have articles debunking the
"peer review" that alarmists just love to quote.
That must be why you are quoting a denialist lie mill instead. lol
Hey stupid, neither site was denialist. Take you meds, you are hallucinating.
See next post.
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/paging-captain-renault-research-journal-out-for-access-fees-5517
Paging Captain Renault - Research Journal Out for Access Fees
June 10, 2009, 13:58:28 | David Bruggeman
The Scientist is the source of our Casablanca flashback, with its
report that an open access journal published by Bentham was willing
to publish a 'nonsense' paper that supposedly passed peer review.
Now where will denialists post their nonsense papers?
Skeptics are not denialists. Take your meds, you are delusional.[/quote:d05a7d43d3] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ouroboros Rex... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eric Gisin wrote:
[quote:98d8b007e6]"Ouroboros Rex" <its at (no spam) casual.com> wrote in message
news:h0r5a0016lj at (no spam) news3.newsguy.com...
Eric Gisin wrote:
All the serious climate science blogs have articles debunking the
"peer review" that alarmists just love to quote.
That must be why you are quoting a denialist lie mill instead. lol
Hey stupid, neither site was denialist. Take you meds, you are
hallucinating.
See next post.
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/paging-captain-renault-research-journal-out-for-access-fees-5517
Paging Captain Renault - Research Journal Out for Access Fees
June 10, 2009, 13:58:28 | David Bruggeman
The Scientist is the source of our Casablanca flashback, with its
report that an open access journal published by Bentham was willing
to publish a 'nonsense' paper that supposedly passed peer review.
Now where will denialists post their nonsense papers?
Skeptics are not denialists.
[/quote:98d8b007e6]
I'm not talking about skeptics, I'm talking about lying denialists, like
you. Any questions? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| columbiaaccidentinvestigation... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 10, 3:45 pm, "Eric Gisin" <gi... at (no spam) uniserve.com> wrote:"All the
serious climate science blogs have articles debunking the "peer
review" that alarmists just love to quote. See next post."
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/paging-captain-renault-r...
"Paging Captain Renault - ...Bentham was willing publish a 'nonsense'
paper ...A Ph.D. student in science communications and a staffer at
The New England Journal of Medicine have been testing journals peer
review practices by submitting papers generated by computer program.
In short, the journal agreed to publish the article, if the
authors ...asserted it had passed peer review"
so the authors of the "nonsense paper" were dishonest to the
publishing company, interesting, as the author of the article eric has
posted mentions the one example, but does not publish the methods and
actual results of the so called "tests". (what a bs article) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eric Gisin... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
We appreciate you admitting you have Troll Disorder. This is the first step in your road to
recovery.
"Ouroboros Rex" <its at (no spam) casual.com> wrote in message news:h0r5aq016mb at (no spam) news3.newsguy.com...
[quote:fca8a48ae1]Eric Gisin wrote:
All the foaming-at-the-mouth trolls who use these tactics put up your
hand!
http://www.climate-skeptic.com
Sorry, k00ksite.
[/quote:fca8a48ae1] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Muehlbauer... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Eric Gisin" <gisin at (no spam) uniserve.com> wrote:
[quote:29557c9d4f]We appreciate you admitting you have Troll Disorder. This is the first step in your road to
recovery.
[/quote:29557c9d4f]
There is no recovery for him. He has been run over by a sceptics truck long
ago.
It is only his anti-intellectual spirit writing here.
Best example for "Idiocy never dies".
[quote:29557c9d4f]"Ouroboros Rex" <its at (no spam) casual.com> wrote in message news:h0r5aq016mb at (no spam) news3.newsguy.com...
Eric Gisin wrote:
All the foaming-at-the-mouth trolls who use these tactics put up your
hand!
http://www.climate-skeptic.com
Sorry, k00ksite.
[/quote:29557c9d4f] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Lone Ranger... |
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:54:48 -0700, "Eric Gisin" <gisin at (no spam) uniserve.com>
wrote:
[quote:beadbe743c]Skeptics are not denialists.
[/quote:beadbe743c]
Those denying AGW are indeed denialists.
--
Hi-Yo, Silver! Away!
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jerry Okamura... |
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Lone Ranger" <snowball2002 at (no spam) bigfoot.com.spamalamadingdong> wrote in message
news:j9ec655i2ijpsf7u17d1ig12p7k4ojaitp at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote:17cff18470]On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:54:48 -0700, "Eric Gisin" <gisin at (no spam) uniserve.com
wrote:
Skeptics are not denialists.
Those denying AGW are indeed denialists.
Well, doesn't that depend on whether the theory is right?[/quote:17cff18470] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jerry Okamura... |
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Lone Ranger" <snowball2002 at (no spam) bigfoot.com.spamalamadingdong> wrote in message
news:j9ec655i2ijpsf7u17d1ig12p7k4ojaitp at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote:f8bec7066e]On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:54:48 -0700, "Eric Gisin" <gisin at (no spam) uniserve.com
wrote:
Skeptics are not denialists.
Those denying AGW are indeed denialists.
Well, doesn't that depend on whether the theory is right?[/quote:f8bec7066e] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
