 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Environment Forum » The Sun Fingered On Climate Change... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| z0nob... |
 Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
[quote:a47a05217b]A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ....
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
[/quote:a47a05217b]
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
Please explain |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Roger Coppock... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:66b0a26d01]On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
[/quote:66b0a26d01]
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
A warming Sun would warm both.
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
[quote:66b0a26d01]
Please explain[/quote:66b0a26d01] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| addinall... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp... at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
[quote:dd71d9cbcb]On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight.."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com....
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
[/quote:dd71d9cbcb]
Not any more it isn't.
[quote:dd71d9cbcb]A warming Sun would warm both.
[/quote:dd71d9cbcb]
Rubbish.
[quote:dd71d9cbcb]
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
[/quote:dd71d9cbcb]
Show your work.
Mark Addinall.
> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 2, 10:54 pm, addinall <addin... at (no spam) addinall.org> wrote:
[quote:2957ecdf5f]On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp... at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
Not any more it isn't.
A warming Sun would warm both.
Rubbish.
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
Show your work.
Mark Addinall.
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote:2957ecdf5f]
Mark you are rubbish you piece of crap |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Claudius Denk... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:18 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:9eaaa0ea14]On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
Please explain
[/quote:9eaaa0ea14]
Uh, since you are the one making the claims--claims that are
unsupported with data--you should be the one explaining.
Well . . . |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 3, 1:12 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:51093eb7cd]On Jul 2, 10:54 pm, addinall <addin... at (no spam) addinall.org> wrote:
On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp... at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
Not any more it isn't.
A warming Sun would warm both.
Rubbish.
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
Show your work.
Mark Addinall.
Mark you are rubbish you piece of crap
[/quote:51093eb7cd]
•• So where is YOUR work, you piece of crap???
- -
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Muehlbauer... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Roger Coppock <rcoppock at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
[quote:d72d5da939]6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
[/quote:d72d5da939]
Of course there is match, idiot.
Instead of working it out, you are knowingly working around.
You just close your eyes to an obvious lie to yourself, fool. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
•• Here's an high school variety science lesson
that you all need to learn:~
In plants, photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide and
water, releasing oxygen as a waste product.
Photosynthesis is vital for life on Earth.
As well as maintaining the normal level of oxygen
in the atmosphere, nearly all life either depends on
it directly as a source of energy, or indirectly as the
ultimate source of the energy in their food.
The amount of energy trapped by photosynthesis is
immense, approximately 100 terawatts: which is
about six times larger than the power consumption
of human civilization.
As well as energy, photosynthesis is also the source
of the carbon in all the organic compounds within
organisms' bodies. In all, photosynthetic organisms
convert around 100,000,000,000 tonnes of carbon
into biomass per year.[5]
CO2 + 2 H2O + photons → (CH2O)n + H2O + O2
carbon dioxide + water + light energy → carbohydrate + oxygen + water
•• I hope that was not too heavy for you to digest.
- -
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk into behaving well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.
1-The stupid aren't smart enough to
follow the logic of what you say. You
have to tell them what is right in very
simple terms. If they don't agree, then
you'll never be able to change their mind.
2- the religious fanatic

If what you say goes against their
religious belief, they will cling to that
religious belief even if it means their
death."
3- There is no way to reform evil-
Not in a million years

There is no way to convince the terrorists,
anthropogenic global warming alarmists,
serial killers, paedophiles, and predators
to change their evil ways. They knew what
they were doing was wrong, but that
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil acts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John M.... |
| Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 4, 9:45Â pm, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:06fa75152a]•• Here's an high school variety science lesson
  that you all need to learn:~
In plants, photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide and
water, releasing oxygen as a waste product.
Photosynthesis is vital for life on Earth.
As well as maintaining the normal level of oxygen
in the atmosphere, nearly all life either depends on
it directly as a source of energy, or indirectly as the
ultimate source of the energy in their food.
The amount of energy trapped by photosynthesis is
immense, approximately 100 terawatts: which is
about six times larger than the power consumption
of human civilization.
As well as energy, photosynthesis is also the source
of the carbon in all the organic compounds within
organisms' bodies. In all, photosynthetic organisms
convert around 100,000,000,000 tonnes of carbon
 into biomass per year.[5]
CO2 + 2 H2O + photons → (CH2O)n + H2O + O2
carbon dioxide + water + light energy → carbohydrate + oxygen + water
•• I hope that was not too heavy for you to digest.
- Â -
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk into behaving well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.
1-The stupid aren't smart enough to
follow the logic of what you say. You
have to tell them what is right in very
simple terms. If they don't agree, then
you'll never be able to change their mind.
2- the religious fanatic

If what you say goes against their
religious belief, they will cling to that
religious belief even if it means their
death."
3- There is no way to reform evil-
  Not in a million years

There is no way to convince the terrorists,
anthropogenic global warming alarmists,
serial killers, paedophiles, and predators
to change their evil ways. They knew what
they were doing was wrong, but that
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil acts.
[/quote:06fa75152a]
Did you think posting the same thing under two different pseudonyms
would fool anyone here? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John M.... |
| Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 3, 7:54 am, addinall <addin... at (no spam) addinall.org> wrote:
[quote:f423a5e7bb]On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp... at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
Not any more it isn't.
A warming Sun would warm both.
Rubbish.
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
Show your work.
[/quote:f423a5e7bb]
Hey Markipoo. Why not tell us that one again about how subtracting CO2
from the atmosphere causes drastic cooling and a snowball earth, but
adding CO2 has no effect whatsoever on the climate.
Bwahahahahaha...... even leonard78 says its junk, and then he signs
himself 22 cents short of a dollar. This one could make even
ahahahanson piss himself quite damply. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 4, 5:34 pm, "John M." <john_howard_mor... at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
[quote:b0c00613ac]On Jul 3, 7:54 am, addinall <addin... at (no spam) addinall.org> wrote:
On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp... at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. The winters are warming faster than the summers
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
Not any more it isn't.
A warming Sun would warm both.
Rubbish.
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
Show your work.
Hey Markipoo. Why not tell us that one again about how subtracting CO2
from the atmosphere causes drastic cooling and a snowball earth, but
adding CO2 has no effect whatsoever on the climate.
Bwahahahahaha...... even leonard78 says its junk, and then he signs
himself 22 cents short of a dollar. This one could make even
ahahahanson piss himself quite damply.
[/quote:b0c00613ac]
•• Weeeellll Morgan take your meds and see your shrink in the morning. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John M.... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 5, 1:15Â am, addinall <addin... at (no spam) addinall.org> wrote:
[quote:bc3fe534ff]On Jul 5, 6:34Â am, "John M." <john_howard_mor... at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 3, 7:54Â am, addinall <addin... at (no spam) addinall.org> wrote:
On Jul 3, 12:54Â pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp... at (no spam) adnc.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:13Â pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:08Â pm, "z0nob" <i... at (no spam) j.com> wrote:
A clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators
July 2 2009
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also
fingers the sun:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHB-4W9XBJ...
"In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar
signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the
earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States
(Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity
and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël
et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to
the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change
should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight."
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
Hey Bozo if it's the sun then how come
1. Â The nighttime temperatures are rising faster than the daylight
temperatures.
2. The polar temperatures are rising faster than the tropical
temperatures.
3. The higher elevation temperatures are rising faster than the lower
elevation temperatures.
4. Â The winters are warming faster than the summers
5. The stratosphere is cooling,
while the troposphere is warming.
Not any more it isn't.
A warming Sun would warm both.
Rubbish.
6. Fourier spectrums of global mean surface
temperatures have no significant 11-year
component in the time domain, to match the
11-year sunspot cycle.
Show your work.
I still haven't seen the Fourier transformations alluded to here.
Hey Markipoo.
I don't recollect asking a member of the great unwashed and under-
educated to engage in familiarity. Â Apart from displays of gross
stupidity, it seems you lack common manners as well.
Why not tell us that one again about how subtracting CO2
from the atmosphere causes drastic cooling and a snowball earth,
Snowball Earth was caused, most probably, by orbital variations and/or
a decrease in solar output. Â Ice begets ice when the temperature (by
all other drivers) remains constant. Â The more ice, the more energy
reflected back into space, the colder the temperature, the more ice.
As an aside, colder water will take up more CO2 from the atmosphere,
and at the very same time, cyanobacteria had learnt a new trick and
were busily removing CO2 from the atmosphere, and replacing it with
O2.
The greenhouse effect of the atmosphere was diminished as a result,
and worsened an already very bad scenario. Â The cold tipping points
exist on this planet, the warm tipping points are fiction.
We got away with snowball Earth by virtue of:
1. Â Huge volcanic eruptions in Siberia (and perhaps Yellowstone) that
covered millions and millions of km^2 of surface with magma for an
extended period of time.
2. As well as the husge heat exchange from the vulcanism, trillions of
tonnes of CO2 were released and replenished the atmosphere with this
most essential gas.
Theory has it that is got uncomfortably warm for a few million years
after the reprieve until Earth stabalised the excessive temperature in
the time honoured way. Â Earth has a very good thermostat.
[/quote:bc3fe534ff]
But surely you're one of those cretins who think the world started
with Adam and Eve some 6000 years ago, aren't you? You certainly come
across like one.
[quote:bc3fe534ff]but
adding CO2 has no effect whatsoever on the climate.
See, you need to ask your mummy (if you have one) or perhaps your
remand officer to explain what is meant by a logarithmic scale of
response. Â Try it yourself. Â Describe the proposed atmospheric effect
on temperature where the atmosphere contains a mix of CO2 at:
1. Â 50ppm
2. 100ppm
3. 150ppm
4. 200ppm
5. 250ppm
6. 300ppm
7. 350ppm
8. 400ppm
9. 500ppm
10. 1000ppm
[/quote:bc3fe534ff]
Hahahaha ... the old Beer's Law canard again. Where do these cretins
get their education. The stupid...It burns!
Beer's law is to do with linear adsorption and relies on the quantum
scattering of e.g. IR by molecules like Hâ‚‚O or COâ‚‚. The scattered
photons (re-radiated, actually) leave the system along a very large
slice of the 4Ï€ sterad. Hence the attenuation of the beam.
In the atmosphere such photons only get to disappear if they are
degraded by transfer of fractional amounts of their energy through
molecular interaction , or if they pass into space. Otherwise they
keep rattling around from one vibrational/rotational state in one
molecule to another vibrational/rotational state in a different
molecule. The more such molecules there are, the longer time elapsed
before the final exit to space. Like adding more pins to a bagatelle.
<snip of material I can't be bothered to read if it's from the same
lamebrain > |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:49 pm
|
|