 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Philosophy - Tech Forum » Hubble - Age of the Universe As a Monad - Exploring An... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Morpheal... |
 Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 7:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It appears that research related to the Hubble program invariably
assumes that the universe, regardless of whether it is open or closed
in its nature, is a monad. The approximate age of that monad is then
considered to be 14 billion years from its origin. I suggest that the
assumption is based on anthropocentric and Terracentric theologies and
their myths, rather than on unbiased science fact, leading to a
monadic frame of space-time reference in which all of the observations
are being interpreted. Let's assume, for the sake of a thought
experiment, that the monad universe is a myth and that there are
multiple originary events in the infinity of absolute space-time. The
question then becomes how then would we determine what belongs to one
origin and what might belong to another, among observable phenomena.
Our instruments extend our vision and thus measurement, but what we
see is then interpreted within the philosophical presupposition of a
monad universe, which is as improbable as the primitive idea of one
moment of ex-nihilo origin for all and everything that there is. The
latter is clearly primitive irrationalism, and would need to be
phenomenologically eliminated from our attempts at observation, in
order to increase the probabilities of more clearly discerning the
reality of what is "out there". This leads to the question of how
would the observable stuff, coming from another originary event, other
than the one origin that is referred to within prevalent monadic
interpretation, within a plurality of origins, be observed and
measured, within the whole of the available observations (data) that
we are gaining ?
I think this becomes a most fundamental question to understanding
cosmology and my prediction is that there must be observables "out
there" that differ in their actual age from what would be expected
within a solitary monadic frame of space-time reference. I suggest we
more likely exist in a multiplicity of originary frames of reference.
Robert Ezergailis
Hamilton, Canada |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:39 am
|
|