| Science Forum Index » Philosophy - Tech Forum » Phenomenology: help please.... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Ben Crowell... |
 Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
This may or may not be a related usage, but as a physicist,
"phenomenology" suggests to me the type of particle physics
work in which the experiments are interpreted using detailed
calculations based on a working theory, rather than trying to
fit everything into some overarching "theory of everything."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| herbzet... |
| Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Ben Crowell wrote:
[quote:29dbc39207]
This may or may not be a related usage, but as a physicist,
"phenomenology" suggests to me the type of particle physics
work in which the experiments are interpreted using detailed
calculations based on a working theory, rather than trying to
fit everything into some overarching "theory of everything."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
[/quote:29dbc39207]
Hm, the final ')' doesn't seem to work in my old browser.
How about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
--
hz
"Mathematics is best done without axioms."
-- Wolfgang Mückenheim corrects Euclid -- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| herbzet... |
| Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
herbzet wrote:
[quote:eb96975569]Ben Crowell wrote:
This may or may not be a related usage, but as a physicist,
"phenomenology" suggests to me the type of particle physics
work in which the experiments are interpreted using detailed
calculations based on a working theory, rather than trying to
fit everything into some overarching "theory of everything."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
Hm, the final ')' doesn't seem to work in my old browser.
How about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
[/quote:eb96975569]
No better. Strange.
--
hz |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Burkhard... |
| Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mar 6, 7:11 pm, herbzet <herb... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:3daeb65cd4]herbzet wrote:
Ben Crowell wrote:
This may or may not be a related usage, but as a physicist,
"phenomenology" suggests to me the type of particle physics
work in which the experiments are interpreted using detailed
calculations based on a working theory, rather than trying to
fit everything into some overarching "theory of everything."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
Hm, the final ')' doesn't seem to work in my old browser.
How about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
No better. Strange.
--
hz
[/quote:3daeb65cd4]
wrong url I think
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics_phenomenology
should work
The linkto phenomenology in philosophy is there , but weak. One of
Husserl's main ideas was "back to the things", that is away from
overly abstract theories to the direct observation of objects - one of
the aims of phenomenology in philosophy was to get through
methodological self reflection as close to a theory (and hence
preconception) free perception of entities as possible. Not too unlike
the "pure sense data " in Carnap's positivism |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| herbzet... |
| Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Burkhard wrote:
[quote:ae6e0a0314]herbzet wrote:
herbzet wrote:
Ben Crowell wrote:
[...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
Hm, the final ')' doesn't seem to work in my old browser.
How about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics)
No better. Strange.
wrong url I think
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics_phenomenology
should work
[/quote:ae6e0a0314]
Ah, much better!
[quote:ae6e0a0314]The linkto phenomenology in philosophy is there , but weak. One of
Husserl's main ideas was "back to the things", that is away from
overly abstract theories to the direct observation of objects - one of
the aims of phenomenology in philosophy was to get through
methodological self reflection as close to a theory (and hence
preconception) free perception of entities as possible. Not too unlike
the "pure sense data " in Carnap's positivism
[/quote:ae6e0a0314]
--
hz
"Mathematics is best done without axioms."
-- Wolfgang Mückenheim corrects Euclid -- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
