Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Agriculture Forum  »  DOE Radiolysis [2019]...
Page 1 of 1    

DOE Radiolysis [2019]...

Author Message
gaby de wilde...
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:11 pm
Guest
The goal of the Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative is to demonstrate the
economic, commercial-scale production of hydrogen using nuclear
energy. If successful, this research could lead to a large-scale,
emission-free, domestic hydrogen production capability to fuel a
future hydrogen economy.

Program Highlights

The Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative addresses the need for greater
utilization of our energy resources by developing energy conversion
systems to economically produce hydrogen for use in our national
transportation system.

Program milestones include:

* FY 2008: Complete construction of integrated laboratory-scale
thermochemical and high-temperature electrolysis hydrogen production
systems and begin testing.

* FY 2011: Select technologies to be demonstrated in the pilot-
scale hydrogen production experiment.

* FY 2013: Begin operation of a pilot-scale hydrogen production
system experiment.

* FY 2016: Complete the final design of a commercial-scale nuclear
hydrogen production system.

* FY 2019: Complete construction and checkout of the nuclear
hydrogen demonstration facility and initiate demonstration of
commercial-scale hydrogen production.

Program milestones include:

* FY 2008: Complete construction of integrated laboratory-scale
thermochemical and high-temperature electrolysis hydrogen production
systems and begin testing.

* FY 2011: Select technologies to be demonstrated in the pilot-
scale hydrogen production experiment.

* FY 2013: Begin operation of a pilot-scale hydrogen production
system experiment.

* FY 2016: Complete the final design of a commercial-scale nuclear
hydrogen production system.

* FY 2019: Complete construction and checkout of the nuclear
hydrogen demonstration facility and initiate demonstration of
commercial-scale hydrogen production.

<url:http://www.ne.doe.gov/nhi/nenhi.html >

It seems to be more about the doe nots ass the doe's.

...... 2019.... I won't hold my breath.... hahaha...

Hear::

<url:http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Ravi%20Cell.pdf >

For people who like shiney immages.

<url:http://www.hyiq.org/Library/HHO.htm >

ohhhhh??

For the youtubies

<url:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgpz-ufPDK4 >
<url:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9XrLOudwRw >

For personal transporters.

<url:http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Hydroxy%20Boosters.pdf >

For the farmers and the transport sector.

<url:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXrHLNRmCOk >
<url:http://www.teslatech.info/ttstore/articles/geet/jnldwg.htm >
<url:http://www.teslatech.info/ttstore/articles/geet/geet.htm >

vroem vroem!

For the nukliar scientists and skool meisters.

<url:http://www.scribd.com/doc/3436830/COLD-FUSION-a-Lecture-for-the-
Class >

For the entoigasts:

<url:http://knol.google.com/k/gaby-de-wilde/water-fueled-car/
1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2 >

A nice overview for the youtubies:

<url:http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=2FA9wiMkXwE >

Have fun,

== This message was posted using the google groups, thank you. ==
 
Larry Sheldon...
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:08 pm
Guest
Bill Ward wrote:

[quote:2878fbbe01]What do you think of the sulfur/iodine thermochemical approach?
[/quote:2878fbbe01]
Any process step that adds nothing at less then 100% efficiency is a
waste of energy.
 
pom...
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:54 am
Guest
Larry Sheldon a écrit :
[quote:652448586a]Bill Ward wrote:

What do you think of the sulfur/iodine thermochemical approach?

Any process step that adds nothing at less then 100% efficiency is a
waste of energy.
But how do you plan to "fuel" cars with low pollution? I thought that[/quote:652448586a]
was the goal of the Hydrogen "movement"?
POM
 
gdewilde...
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:20 am
Guest
On Nov 17, 10:06 pm, Bill Ward <bw... at (no spam) REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote:
[quote:071480b7af]
What do you think of the sulfur/iodine thermochemical approach?

www.nuclear.utah.edu/Nep/CVEEN5730/pdf%20files/SI%20Cycle.pdf

ISTR claims of ~50% or so theoretical efficiency.
[/quote:071480b7af]
I wasn't allowed to post my response so I put it here.

http://clean-nuclear-energy.go-here.nl/doe-radiolysis/
 
muser...
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:37 pm
Guest
On Nov 28 2008, 1:20 pm, gdewilde <fotot... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:d07e48a411]On Nov 17, 10:06 pm, Bill Ward <bw... at (no spam) REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote:



What do you think of the sulfur/iodine thermochemical approach?

www.nuclear.utah.edu/Nep/CVEEN5730/pdf%20files/SI%20Cycle.pdf

ISTR claims of ~50% or so theoretical efficiency.

I wasn't allowed to post my response so I put it here.

http://clean-nuclear-energy.go-here.nl/doe-radiolysis/
[/quote:d07e48a411]
why can't radiation be used to create hydrogen peroxide, which is
easier to convert to hydrogen (if need be), or can be used directly as
a fuel. I saw this on another site
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t42773.html
 
gdewilde...
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:31 am
Guest
http://nai.nasa.gov/nai2005/abstracts/601%20-%20Blair_NAI_abstract.doc.pdf
Molecular hydrogen and oxidants produced by the radiolysis of water
may provide a continuous source of energy to subsurface microbial
communities (Pedersen, 1999).
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:20 pm