Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Physics Forum  »  Length contraction fun...
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Spaceman...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:36 pm
Guest
Lets have a 100 kilogram 1 cubic meter cube, moving
at 0.5c around a circular path that has a radius of 250,000 miles
and the face of the cube is always facing us.

If length contraction truly occurs physically,
What is the new volume and density of the cube?

How does a density change with "speed" alone?
How does a volume change with speed alone?

How many silly people are going to continue
to think the physical length changed at all from speed alone
and also caused a volume and denstity change also because
of such?
:)


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
Huang...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:36 pm
Guest
On Jul 17, 10:36 pm, "Spaceman" <space... at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh>
wrote:
Quote:
Lets have a 100 kilogram 1 cubic meter cube, moving
at 0.5c around a circular path that has a radius of 250,000 miles
and the face of the cube is always facing us.

If length contraction truly occurs physically,
What is the new volume and density of the cube?

How does a density change with "speed" alone?
How does a volume change with speed alone?

How many silly people are going to continue
to think the physical length changed at all from speed alone
and also caused a volume and denstity change also because
of such?
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman


If these things were probabilistic, you would'nt be singing that tune.
Spaceman...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:41 pm
Guest
Huang wrote:
Quote:
On Jul 17, 10:36 pm, "Spaceman" <space... at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
Lets have a 100 kilogram 1 cubic meter cube, moving
at 0.5c around a circular path that has a radius of 250,000 miles
and the face of the cube is always facing us.

If length contraction truly occurs physically,
What is the new volume and density of the cube?

How does a density change with "speed" alone?
How does a volume change with speed alone?

How many silly people are going to continue
to think the physical length changed at all from speed alone
and also caused a volume and denstity change also because
of such?
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman


If these things were probabilistic, you would'nt be singing that tune.

They are "problem-istic"
Smile
I could care less about probabilistic
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:03 am