WORMTOSKY WROTE (I HIGHLIGHT)
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 3:52 PM
*** The null hypothesis is not a point in the
acceptance region. The null hypothesis describes a
subset of the parameter space. The acceptance region
is a subset of the sample space. As long as the
sample is in the acceptance region, the null
hypothesis is accepted...***

The compulsive LIAR, Jack Tomsky accused ME of a
sentence of him Jul 11, 2008 3:52 PM,
*** The acceptance region is a subset of the sample
space.***

However WAS HIM THAT DID SAY
(Jul 15, 2008 3:15 PM)
Afonso again repeats his ignorance that the sample
space has to be an interval. The sample space is the
set of all possible sample outcomes. By definition,
each sample has to lie in the sample space.

UNLESS Jack Tomsky suffer from MADNESS (family should
persuade him to see a doctor), this is a criminal
EPISODE intending to defame me.
What I said was precisely that the sample space is
the set of all samples, inorganically, no matter what
was intended to do with them, Therefore they have not
to be affected to a Statistical Test, a rejection
interval, or to a fail-to-reject one.
*********************.
Luís Amaral Afonso [The moderator destroyer]

"__3__He denies that the sample lies in the sample
space: THIS IS A LIE, Readers, THE BRUNDLE was from
Jack Tomsky that *** the samples are in the
parameter’s SPACE *** to what I reply in these terms:
NOT AT ALL the samples are too rough to enter in a
space that is an INTERVAL. This boy is STUPID,
STINGY; MACHIEVOUS and LIAR"

From THIS Jack Tomsky understood that
*** This is what Afonso said on July 15, calling the
sample space an interval. !!! ***

Jack Tomsky paranoia is getting worse and worse: the
interval under discussion was the PARAMETR´S
INTERVAL!!!!!!! Jack characteristically do insult my
intelligence (and will get some applauses, I’m sure)
claiming that I was referring the sample space
(NEVER) when in fact the interval under quarreling
was, they never stop to be, the PARAMETER INTERVALS
leading to .REJECT or FAIL TO REJECT THE NULL
HYPOTHESES.
____This is clear to those that could read my words
without prejudice.


***************
Luís Amaral Afonso [The moderator destroyer]

WORMTOMSKY said:
*** Amaral's erroneous description that the
acceptance region must be an interval was bad enough.
Now he claims that the acceptance region is an
interval in the parameter space. ***


IF JACK (by chance) WORMTOMSKY READ WHAT WIKIPEDIA
A SAYS
************** QUOTING: ***************
Region of acceptance
The set of values for which we fail to reject the
null hypothesis ************************

Posted: Jul 16, 2008 4:03 PM
I said:
IF JACK (by chance) WORMTOMSKY READ WHAT WIKIPEDIA
SAYS
************** QUOTING: ***************
Region of acceptance The set of values for which we
fail to reject the null hypothesis
************************
To which Jack Tomsky replies:
And the set of values is a subset of the sample
space.

HOWEVER, a former Jack Tomsky post:
(Jul 16, 208, 11.16 AM)
I accused myself of believing that the acceptance
region is a subset of the sample space.
**********************
HAD HE THE CONCERN TO TAKE THE MEDICINES? I doubt.
***************************
Luis Amaral Afonso