Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Physics Forum  »  Car on water which instead of over 20 l/100km burns...
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
DB...
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:20 pm
Guest
News wrote:
Quote:

"DB" <abc at (no spam) some.net> wrote in message
news:qNB8k.106371$WG2.37468 at (no spam) fe117.usenetserver.com...
News wrote:

"DB" <abc at (no spam) some.net> wrote in message
news:CTz8k.26503$fX5.22639 at (no spam) fe109.usenetserver.com...
News wrote:

"DB" <abc at (no spam) some.net> wrote in message
news:gyz8k.2235$b_3.1732 at (no spam) fe127.usenetserver.com...
News wrote:

snip

Got it:
http://totalizm.nazwa.pl/boiler.htm

What a bunch of nonsense.

A COP of 1.7 is for that each kW consumed 1.7 is output. Is that
over unity?

That is not what COP means. 1.7 kw is output _and_ moved. The
extra heat doesn't just appear as if by magic.

I know what COP is in relation to a heat pump. The pump "moves"
heat. There is no heat being moved here. Input is electrical energy
and output is heat. Both can be measured in kW.

Then someone is screwing up or lying. It is just that simple. If
such a simple device did exist, there would be a fire like
excitement on every university campus in the world.

No excitement, the claim is bullshit.

You are obviously a very pessimistic man.

Nope, realistic. You, on the other hand, are a believer.

Enough independent evidence suggests...

You are just not getting this. It flies in the face of over one hundred
years of observations. If it were true, all hell would have broken loose
in the scientific community.

Quote:
Do you think the world is going end soon as well?

No. Why would you ask such a stupid question?

Because you are obviously a very pessimistic man.

To you apparently. Nice of you to have a skewed opinion. Now, qualify
your observation.
...
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:02 pm
Guest
On Jun 30, 8:54 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati... at (no spam) hotmail.com>
wrote:
...
Quote:
This was exacly what the Jornal "Scientific American" said about the
Wright Brothers' airplane.

Cite ?

Graham

I do NOT believe that my effort to find the appropriate citation would
quinch your kind of mind - so it would be the work that is just
wasted. However, if you are serious about this citation, then you can
find details in the book [2P4] by Richard Milton "Forbidden sciennce",
referenced at the very beginning on my thread
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.cars/browse_thread/thread/875fbde577dd5ac3#
.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak
Eeyore...
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:11 pm
Guest
janpajak at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:

Quote:
Eeyore wrote:
...
This was exacly what the Jornal "Scientific American" said about the
Wright Brothers' airplane.

Cite ?

Graham

I do NOT believe that my effort to find the appropriate citation would
quinch your kind of mind

Because it wouldn't EXIST.

Graham
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:49 am