Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Medicine - Dentistry Forum  »  CBS News report on dentistry...
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
The Webby...
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:25 pm
Guest
If you watched it this evening, what did you think about it?

Webby
Bill...
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:25 pm
Guest
On Jun 29, 6:25 pm, The Webby <tmjiatroepide... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Quote:
If you watched it this evening, what did you think about it?

Webby

I didn't see the broadcast. What was it about?

- dentaldoc
The Webby...
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:43 am
Guest
In article
<815f5f27-faef-4f1c-b506-149f927e37eb at (no spam) w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Bill <dentaldoc at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Jun 29, 6:25 pm, The Webby <tmjiatroepide... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
If you watched it this evening, what did you think about it?

Webby

I didn't see the broadcast. What was it about?

- dentaldoc

Here's a link to the online video of the broadcast:

http://www.videowired.com/video/?id=3349696317

Webby
Bill...
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:36 am
Guest
On Jun 30, 6:43 am, The Webby <tmjiatroepide... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Quote:
In article
815f5f27-faef-4f1c-b506-149f927e3... at (no spam) w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,

 Bill <dental... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 29, 6:25 pm, The Webby <tmjiatroepide... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
If you watched it this evening, what did you think about it?

Webby


In three minutes(!), of course it was very shallow. It doesn't really
address the main causes of dental problems in the first place.

I have been addressing these problems for over thirty years, and some
sensationalistic rating-grubbing news show give it THREE MINUTES??

And they couldn't even get the main issue defined!

The idea that "insurance" is the key to solving dental health problems
is complete hogwash.

In this country, people decide to spend more money on their HAIR than
they do on their teeth! Do we ever hear that there is a problem with a
lack of HAIR insurance?

The media here didn't even address the issue of priorities. Why do I
see my welfare patients wearing clothes that I couldn't afford myself?
($180 shoes? Who are we kidding?)Why am I giving them something for
free when obviously they have the money to buy fancy, unnecessary
stuff?

Well, my personal answer to that particular question is, that if I
didn't provide them with the free care, then they would suffer dental
disease. But that doesn't address the real problems of untreated
dental disease on a national scale.

The main problem is that people don't bother to take care of
themselves OR their children. That's it in a nutshell. The phony straw
man of "dental insurance" is about as relevant as "hair insurance."

People need to set their own priorities. When you see a lot of dental
disease, you'll find a skewed set of personal priorities.

- dentaldoc
George...
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:53 am
Guest
On Jul 1, 7:35 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldm... at (no spam) dentaltwins.com> wrote:

Quote:
Do I have to stand up as the only lefty in this group?

I'm afraid so Steve! Although I was there once so I know ehere you're
coming from.
Many of the problems plaguing the modern world can be pinpointed down
to a lak of personal responsibility and self-aid. If we continue to
believe that our health is someone else's responsibility (be it an
insurance or the government), these problems will never be solved.

Regards,
George
Mark & Steven Bornfeld...
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
Guest
Bill wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 30, 6:43 am, The Webby <tmjiatroepide... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
In article
815f5f27-faef-4f1c-b506-149f927e3... at (no spam) w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,

Bill <dental... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 29, 6:25 pm, The Webby <tmjiatroepide... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
If you watched it this evening, what did you think about it?
Webby


In three minutes(!), of course it was very shallow. It doesn't really
address the main causes of dental problems in the first place.

I have been addressing these problems for over thirty years, and some
sensationalistic rating-grubbing news show give it THREE MINUTES??

And they couldn't even get the main issue defined!

The idea that "insurance" is the key to solving dental health problems
is complete hogwash.

In this country, people decide to spend more money on their HAIR than
they do on their teeth! Do we ever hear that there is a problem with a
lack of HAIR insurance?

The media here didn't even address the issue of priorities. Why do I
see my welfare patients wearing clothes that I couldn't afford myself?
($180 shoes? Who are we kidding?)Why am I giving them something for
free when obviously they have the money to buy fancy, unnecessary
stuff?

Well, my personal answer to that particular question is, that if I
didn't provide them with the free care, then they would suffer dental
disease. But that doesn't address the real problems of untreated
dental disease on a national scale.

The main problem is that people don't bother to take care of
themselves OR their children. That's it in a nutshell. The phony straw
man of "dental insurance" is about as relevant as "hair insurance."

People need to set their own priorities. When you see a lot of dental
disease, you'll find a skewed set of personal priorities.

- dentaldoc






Do I have to stand up as the only lefty in this group? I don't see
many patients on public assistance, but I see plenty that I truly
believe cannot pay for anything like comprehensive dental care. They
don't walk in here wearing Manolos, either.
Yeah, many of them have made mistakes in life. Some are lazy, some
just unlucky. I figure I'm no one to judge. I've also seen children
with severe dental and other problems, and public assistance has failed
them.
I haven't seen the news clip, so I can't comment. In New York state,
welfare rolls are way down. Dentistry is expensive. I try not to hold
myself out as some moral paragon because I floss my teeth. And I don't
do full mouth reconstruction in a filthy mouth. But if you see oral
health care as part of health care and not in the same category as a
manicure, I don't think you can rationalize the situation as merely
badly set priorities (though that is certainly out there too).
I know enough about your history that I'm sure you didn't mean to leave
that impression.

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Robert W. McAdams...
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:43 pm
Guest
Bill wrote:
Quote:

In three minutes(!), of course it was very shallow. It doesn't really
address the main causes of dental problems in the first place.

I have been addressing these problems for over thirty years, and some
sensationalistic rating-grubbing news show give it THREE MINUTES??

And they couldn't even get the main issue defined!

The idea that "insurance" is the key to solving dental health problems
is complete hogwash.

I completely agree!

What some people still fail to grasp is that insurance is always a less
than zero sum game: To stay in business, insurance companies have to
charge more in premiums than they pay out in claims. The kind of
situation in which this makes sense is when you are insuring an event
whose likelihood is very low, but which will be very expensive if it
occurs. No one knows in advance who the unlucky people are going to be,
so the insurance company spreads the expenses of the unlucky few over
all of the policy holders, while at the same time taking a small
percentage of the money to cover its own operating expenses.

But dental checkups, cleaning, and filling of dental caries don't
qualify as unlikely events, so the only way an insurance company can pay
for them is to charge premiums that cover what the customer would pay
directly. So a patient who can't afford to pay directly isn't going to
be able to afford insurance, either. What they are really talking about
is having a government program that will pay for those who can't afford
either to pay directly or to buy insurance. And such a program needs to
encourage patients to have regular checkups and to seek treatment early,
since this will be cheapest in the long run.


Bob
Mark & Steven Bornfeld...
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:34 pm
Guest
George wrote:
Quote:
On Jul 1, 7:35 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
bornfeldm... at (no spam) dentaltwins.com> wrote:

Do I have to stand up as the only lefty in this group?

I'm afraid so Steve! Although I was there once so I know ehere you're
coming from.
Many of the problems plaguing the modern world can be pinpointed down
to a lak of personal responsibility and self-aid. If we continue to
believe that our health is someone else's responsibility (be it an
insurance or the government), these problems will never be solved.

Regards,
George


How about education? Sanitation? Mail delivery? Licensing of
professions? Are you about to go Lyndon Larouche on us? (Probably the
best-known libertarian in the states).
I'm all for responsibility. But I'm not an absolutist about it. Ever
read Ibsen's "Ghosts"? "The father's sins are visited on the children".
Sure. If my father didn't raise me right, should I be held to the
same standard as the rich punk who went to the best schools? Is money
and opportunity the only legitimate determinant of success in life? Or
is there a public interest in seeing that people get the tools to
succeed (notice I say tools--not success itself).
I don't have all the answers. But the attitude in the states that
"I've got mine, you get yours" has its limits. I don't get the sense
that most of western Europe feels the same way about the responsibility
of the individual vs. the responsibility we have to the wider society.

Steve


--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Amatus Cremona...
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:58 pm
Guest
There are those of us on this forum who came from very "modest" means. I
grew up in one of the worst slums of Detroit. I know all about poverty.
But,,,,,,,,,,,,, this country allows opportunities for those who choose to
try hard enough. I have only been limited in my achievements by my own
personal ambitions.

The mental handicapped, and the total physical handicapped should be helped
out in the degree that they require help. The able minded and able bodied,
need to push themselves harder.

--
/

Amatus

/
"Mark & Steven Bornfeld" <bornfeldmung at (no spam) dentaltwins.com> wrote in message
news:Ipxak.93$Z11.72 at (no spam) trndny05...
Quote:
George wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:35 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
bornfeldm... at (no spam) dentaltwins.com> wrote:

Do I have to stand up as the only lefty in this group?

I'm afraid so Steve! Although I was there once so I know ehere you're
coming from.
Many of the problems plaguing the modern world can be pinpointed down
to a lak of personal responsibility and self-aid. If we continue to
believe that our health is someone else's responsibility (be it an
insurance or the government), these problems will never be solved.

Regards,
George


How about education? Sanitation? Mail delivery? Licensing of
professions? Are you about to go Lyndon Larouche on us? (Probably the
best-known libertarian in the states).
I'm all for responsibility. But I'm not an absolutist about it. Ever
read Ibsen's "Ghosts"? "The father's sins are visited on the children".
Sure. If my father didn't raise me right, should I be held to the same
standard as the rich punk who went to the best schools? Is money and
opportunity the only legitimate determinant of success in life? Or is
there a public interest in seeing that people get the tools to succeed
(notice I say tools--not success itself).
I don't have all the answers. But the attitude in the states that "I've
got mine, you get yours" has its limits. I don't get the sense that most
of western Europe feels the same way about the responsibility of the
individual vs. the responsibility we have to the wider society.

Steve


--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Simplicio...
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:30 am
Guest
On Jul 1, 3:53 pm, George <chpet... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Jul 1, 7:35 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld

bornfeldm... at (no spam) dentaltwins.com> wrote:
        Do I have to stand up as the only lefty in this group?

I'm afraid so Steve! Although I was there once so I know ehere you're
coming from.
Many of the problems plaguing the modern world can be pinpointed down
to a lak of personal responsibility and self-aid. If we continue to
believe that our health is someone else's responsibility (be it an
insurance or the government), these problems will never be solved.

Regards,
George


That's an interesting sentiment, I forgot if you are in the U.S., but
here most
people expressing that sentiment have health insurance. What is the
philosphy
behind health insurance? that if you get realllly sick and incur large
medical bills
then your medical Bills are paid for (i.e become someone else's
responsability).

In fact, many insurance companies try their best to exclude those with
preexisting conditions, yet if they pay a premium you'd think they
have the
same right to real health insurance as everyone else. So what you may
regard as self-reliance (paying an insurance premium and obtaining
coverage)
could in fact be viewed as an unfair privelage
Simplicio...
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:39 am
Guest
On Jul 1, 4:43 pm, "Robert W. McAdams" <r... at (no spam) fambright.com> wrote:
Quote:
Bill wrote:

In three minutes(!), of course it was very shallow. It doesn't really
address the main causes of dental problems in the first place.

I have been addressing these problems for over thirty years, and some
sensationalistic rating-grubbing news show give it THREE MINUTES??

And they couldn't even get the main issue defined!

The idea that "insurance" is the key to solving dental health problems
is complete hogwash.

I completely agree!

What some people still fail to grasp is that insurance is always a less
than zero sum game:  To stay in business, insurance companies have to
charge more in premiums than they pay out in claims.  The kind of
situation in which this makes sense is when you are insuring an event
whose likelihood is very low, but which will be very expensive if it
occurs.  No one knows in advance who the unlucky people are going to be,
so the insurance company spreads the expenses of the unlucky few over
all of the policy holders, while at the same time taking a small
percentage of the money to cover its own operating expenses.

But dental checkups, cleaning, and filling of dental caries don't
qualify as unlikely events, so the only way an insurance company can pay
for them is to charge premiums that cover what the customer would pay
directly.  So a patient who can't afford to pay directly isn't going to
be able to afford insurance, either.  What they are really talking about
is having a government program that will pay for those who can't afford
either to pay directly or to buy insurance.  And such a program needs to
encourage patients to have regular checkups and to seek treatment early,
since this will be cheapest in the long run.

Bob

It seems reasonable that someone who doesn't get dental care paid for
by
the government, will end up costing the taxpayer more if they get
sick, therefore..
.. dental visit coverage should be a top priority of the
government....your saying?
JimSocal...
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:55 pm
Guest
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:35:00 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldmung at (no spam) dentaltwins.com> wrote:


Quote:
Do I have to stand up as the only lefty in this group? I don't see
many patients on public assistance, but I see plenty that I truly
believe cannot pay for anything like comprehensive dental care. They
don't walk in here wearing Manolos, either.
Yeah, many of them have made mistakes in life. Some are lazy, some
just unlucky. I figure I'm no one to judge. I've also seen children
with severe dental and other problems, and public assistance has failed
them.
I haven't seen the news clip, so I can't comment. In New York state,
welfare rolls are way down. Dentistry is expensive. I try not to hold
myself out as some moral paragon because I floss my teeth. And I don't
do full mouth reconstruction in a filthy mouth. But if you see oral
health care as part of health care and not in the same category as a
manicure, I don't think you can rationalize the situation as merely
badly set priorities (though that is certainly out there too).
I know enough about your history that I'm sure you didn't mean to leave
that impression.

Steve
Thank you Dr. Bornfeld for standing up for the libreal side, and thank

you Bill for helping those in need.

1st of all, what do you expect from a news report? TV news in general
is biased and superficial, about entertaninmnet not information. Call
it "infotainment".

Dental insurance as it exists today is more of a detriment to the
patient than it is a help, and let's not pretend it's "insurance"
anyway, it's a pre-paid plan that covers your cleanings and exams and
then the [unscrupulous] dentists up-sell you things like "deep
cleanings" for extra profit and hopefully they also find enough
legitimate fillings and such to cover their expenses and turn a little
profit as well.

I have seen plenty of these Delta HMO and CIGNA HMO dentists to know
that 90% of them at least where I live are so desperate to make money
off "insurance" patients, they will lie and say you need work you
don't need. I've been told I need "deep cleanings" by 2 different
dentists only to go to a more upright dentist (including a dentsl
school) who confirmed my gums are fine and I did not need it. I told
my dental school prof, "If I do need it, please, let's do it now that
I have the money" (this was a year after I'd been told I needed it by
the CIGNA dentist) and he said, "No, you really don't need it." This
upsell crap happens all the time around here, I've talked to several
friends who've been told they "need" the deep cleanings as well. Maybe
some do but I've seen it often enough to know that a lot of the time
it's a lie, plain and simple.

So dental insurance as it is known today is 1) not insurance and 2)
encourages lying and cheating on the part of the dentist in order to
make a profit.

That said, I do think we need a government assistance plan to help
those who are truly down and out and do not have the money for dental
work, just as we need a medical plan for those who are not insured.

On the other hand, I agree that many people do not take care of
themselves even when they can. They see dental care as optional and
something they cannot afford. I was one of these most of my life and
thus I recently completed 6 dental implants and root canals and
fillings. I wish I'd have learned to take care of my teeth, but I
never did.

I take full responsibility for not going to the dentist often enough
in recent years .

However, there were also many years in the past when I truly could not
afford dental work and I let things go because of the money. I was
told by some dentists "you need bridge work" and then another dentist
would say that I would be okay without it. But the bottom line was I
couldn't afford the bridge work; I was only working enough to pay
bills and no savings, no extra for bridgework or anything else.

As for a national health plan, we CAN create one that works, and we
CAN afford it if only we stop spending billions on wars and things
that do not benefit the citizens of this country. Note that I say
"CITIZENS", not those who are here illegally.

How does the war in Iraq help us, again? Well, let's make that another
thread...

I just lost my job after 12 years through no fault of my own.
I will be losing my medical insurance in August unless I find another
job that offers benefits, which is getting increasingly harder to find
because greedy corporations prefer to hire you only part time so they
do not have to pay benefits. Can't blame the corporations since they
are operating under a mandate to make the maximum profit. Who I can
blame is the American people for allowing this type of system to
propagate and flourish - a system where all that matters is profit,
not people. And yes, both Democrats and Republicans are part of the
problem.

So what do I do if I need a major surgery, or get cancer or something
like that while I don't have insurance? Please tell me because I am
very stressed out about what will happen if I don't get health
insurance with a new job in the next couple of months. (By the way I
am in an industry that is laying off people all over the place and I
don't expect to find a job soon that pays anywhere near what I've been
making, for this and other reasons.) Shouldn't there be a system in
place to give hard working people like myself health insurance in the
interim?

So dental care is not my major concern, right now, but the above
scenario points up the reason why we do need a government assistance
plan for people who are not insured - especially people who have been
gainfully employed but lost their job.

But certainly children of poor or even stupid or irresponsible parents
need to be taken care of, and people who are out of work or unable to
work, elderly, etc. also need to be taken care of.

We are a rich enough country to take care of our citizens. All we need
is the will to do it, making that more of a priority than killing
people and controlling governments in foreign wars, loaning money to
other countries, and so on.

I'm stepping down off my soapbox now. Thanks for listening.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:22 pm